StoleIt Posted August 11, 2010 Posted August 11, 2010 What do you expect from a guy with sleeve creases in his flightsuit? I just noticed that. UFB.
08Dawg Posted August 11, 2010 Posted August 11, 2010 What do you expect from a guy with sleeve creases in his flightsuit? Going slightly along with this...why the hell do we insist on wearing eight-point covers in desert locations? That's a Navy-Marine thing.
ram02 Posted August 11, 2010 Posted August 11, 2010 Going slightly along with this...why the hell do we insist on wearing eight-point covers in desert locations? That's a Navy-Marine thing. Well, there's always the boonie hat, but apparently that piece of headgear isn't "stract" enough if you're an O-5 or above.
Vertigo Posted August 11, 2010 Posted August 11, 2010 (edited) You're comparing apples to tuesday. Damn it! If you're gonna steal my material at least get it right. The actual saying is: Congratulations. You just compared ice cream to Tuesday. Edited August 11, 2010 by Vertigo
Napoleon_Tanerite Posted August 11, 2010 Posted August 11, 2010 Well, there's always the boonie hat, but apparently that piece of headgear isn't "stract" enough if you're an O-5 or above. another one of my trademarks-- the fedora boonie hat. Still can't believe nobody's said shit about that either. I really need to up my troll game. And if you want a black reflective belt, they at https://www.belts.breflective.com/retroreflective-belts-colors-2in.php, but don't bitch about the price. It's a small price to pay to troll shoe clerks.
pawnman Posted August 11, 2010 Posted August 11, 2010 another one of my trademarks-- the fedora boonie hat. Still can't believe nobody's said shit about that either. I really need to up my troll game. And if you want a black reflective belt, they at https://www.belts.breflective.com/retroreflective-belts-colors-2in.php, but don't bitch about the price. It's a small price to pay to troll shoe clerks. Awesome. I'm kind of partial to this one: https://www.news.alain-pelletier.com/?p=163
BQZip01 Posted August 11, 2010 Posted August 11, 2010 First, he's not Patton nor is he facing what Patton was facing. You're comparing apples to tuesday. If he's a true leader he will not have to try to "present a 'tough guy image'." He just needs to lead from the front and measure what matters and recognize and reward the people who are getting the mission done, at all levels...I doubt Robin Olds ever felt he needed to run around yelling "chins are in!" everytime he saw an untucked shirt in the shitter in order to present a tough guy image. Leading from the front and killing the enemy is a pretty effective technique, unless you suck. Or perhaps you aren't allowed to kill the enemy? No matter how tempting it might be to lace that shoeclerk's room with 30mm tracer rounds... I agree this isn't Patton and it isn't comparing the exact same thing, but there are parallels (more comparing apple trees to evergreens; they are both leaders in wartime) You are absolutely correct that he doesn't have to light someone up for such asinine things. But he also has to enforce orders and if shoeclerkish higher ups are demanding this kind of behavior from their subordinate leaders, there is little they can do without losing their jobs (perhaps that sacrifice might need to be made if it is the case). As for not "presenting an image", I call BS and Patton was the KING of presenting an image. He led from the front, said what he meant, and didn't care who he pissed off, but by the same token, he always presented himself as a professional. He was a prima donna nearly obsessed with showing up other generals with more pomp and circumstance. He always had a grand appearance. Weak argument. You're saying it is his perogative to shit on people for queep because he has to cover his ass. Are you actually in any way relating shitting on people for queep with "anwering as to why a mission didn't go?" Please. A commander may make a bad decision (i.e. to ground a jet to address people not tucking their shirts in while sleeping...), but it is still his decision to make even if it is a bad one. Commanders are people too and they make mistakes. Give him a chance to learn and he may turn out just fine. You don't need all those people to get the job done downrange. Well, I guess we will agree to disagree and I won't criticize someone for having an extra exec if they feel they need one. Like I said before, I used to work in a Group with four. I deployed to a Wing/pseudo-MAJCOM as the sole exec. I can easily see the workload being shared as a better alternative in some cases. Before you criticize someone, make sure you walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away...and you have their shoes... Unfortunately, the worst part of a scenario like this is people's morale is built around developing creative ways to fuck with the leadership instead of feeling good about being downrange and led by a true warrior, knowing you may never have it this good again. So true. But I submit there is a happy medium. Leaders who will let you push the envelope and mess with leadership to boost morale.
schokie Posted August 11, 2010 Posted August 11, 2010 A commander may make a bad decision (i.e. to ground a jet to address people not tucking their shirts in while sleeping...), but it is still his decision to make even if it is a bad one. Commanders are people too and they make mistakes. Give him a chance to learn and he may turn out just fine. A combat zone is not a leadership laboratory. This isn't ROTC Field Training here. An O-6 is supposed to have this crap figured out by now. Canceling lines which reduces support for the folks on the ground, thereby putting American lives at risk, to deal with queep is a complete foul. You're correct that commanders make mistakes. That doesn't make it right, nor does it need to be explained away as a 'learning opportunity'. As Rainman says, "This ain't no puss game". 1
Guest Posted August 11, 2010 Posted August 11, 2010 Damn it! If you're gonna steal my material at least get it right. 2 Correction made.
Guest Posted August 11, 2010 Posted August 11, 2010 Well, I guess we will agree to disagree and I won't criticize someone for having an extra exec if they feel they need one. Like I said before, I used to work in a Group with four. I deployed to a Wing/pseudo-MAJCOM as the sole exec. I can easily see the workload being shared as a better alternative in some cases. Before you criticize someone, make sure you walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away...and you have their shoes... Copy. I've given those very shoes back and they don't look anything like what I was wearing...but I am more than a mile away.
HerkFE Posted August 11, 2010 Posted August 11, 2010 And if you want a black reflective belt, they at https://www.belts.breflective.com/retroreflective-belts-colors-2in.php, but don't bitch about the price. It's a small price to pay to troll shoe clerks. Just ordered mine.
Guest Crew Report Posted August 12, 2010 Posted August 12, 2010 (edited) A combat zone is not a leadership laboratory. This isn't ROTC Field Training here. An O-6 is supposed to have this crap figured out by now. Canceling lines which reduces support for the folks on the ground, thereby putting American lives at risk, to deal with queep is a complete foul. You're correct that commanders make mistakes. That doesn't make it right, nor does it need to be explained away as a 'learning opportunity'. As Rainman says, "This ain't no puss game". He sounds like the "Fun Burglar" who was the OG at Salem back in '05. He would walk around Ops daily at 1700 to remind everyone that the sun was setting and to have your reflective belt on. Same person who would make the OG do "Camp Cleanup" in DCU's instead of flight suits because he didn't want to anger the non-flyers on base. Thankfully he was shit canned as the Wing King at Pope last year. You're right, this isn't leadership lab. By the time you're and O-6+ you should have your shit in a sock, however with the PME warriors out there a lot of them don't. Edited August 12, 2010 by Crew Report
Napoleon_Tanerite Posted August 12, 2010 Posted August 12, 2010 ... however with the PME warriors out there a lot of them don't. I cut all but the important part of your post. Most ops dudes really don't get a real taste of "you're the man" leadership until they reach the O-5 level, it's just the nature of the beast in the Air Force, double so in the ops world. Sure you might do a gig as a shop chief or flight commander, but in terms of real leadership, opportunities for junior officers are really limited unless you do something off duty. Most of what dudes learn about leadership comes from PME or other "I read it in a book" type learning. Every time you're doing a job for the first time it's going to be on a trial and error basis; but combat leadership is NOT a good place to learn by trial and error. I'm actually glad I volunteered to work with Civil Air Patrol. I actually learn more about leadership by teaching it to cadets than I ever really learned as a cadet myself back in my CAP cadet days or ROTC days. As a junior captain, my opportunities at work are limited as I described above. 1 1
HerkDerka Posted August 12, 2010 Posted August 12, 2010 (edited) I cut all but the important part out of your post. I'm actually glad I volunteered to work with Civil Air Patrol. I actually learn more about leadership by teaching it to cadets than I ever really learned as a cadet myself back in my CAP cadet days or ROTC days. Edited August 12, 2010 by HerkDerka 1
Napoleon_Tanerite Posted August 12, 2010 Posted August 12, 2010 I cut all but the important part out of your post. ha. ha. ha. i knew the degenerate homosexual thing would come up sooner rather than later.
Guest Crew Report Posted August 12, 2010 Posted August 12, 2010 Most ops dudes really don't get a real taste of "you're the man" leadership until they reach the O-5 level, it's just the nature of the beast in the Air Force, double so in the ops world. Pro tip: Some of us have been flying/in the AF longer than you and understand this. 6
HuggyU2 Posted August 12, 2010 Posted August 12, 2010 (edited) I'm actually glad I volunteered to work with Civil Air Patrol. Amen! The first thing you have ever posted that I agree with. Thanks for volunteering. Edited August 12, 2010 by Huggyu2
frog Posted August 13, 2010 Posted August 13, 2010 Keep the faith! I just got an email with the base policies for my next deployment. - No relective belts (not optional, they are completely banned) - No saluting - Shower shoes to latrines is okay You guys just need to get a step or two further down range. Drink a beer for me though!
Guest Sunrunner Posted August 13, 2010 Posted August 13, 2010 Long time reader but first post and a newly minted actual account, so hello. Now that that is out of the way, I ran into this thread while looking for some dirt on what kind of place to expect out of AUAB since I have managed to avoid it up until now. Unfortunately, fate caught up to me and I am now going to be doing a YEAR there rocking the glorified conex housing units. I knew that coming from SOF and having to do the ACC gig was going to result in culture shock, but after reading some of the posts here I am convinced I'm not going to make it the full year without loosing it and kicking some F@c%-tard in the head. For those that have spent some quality time in the AUAB slice of heaven, any pointers? Black reflective belt ordered, so check item number 1 off the list.
Napoleon_Tanerite Posted August 13, 2010 Posted August 13, 2010 anyone been in the CC chow hall this morning? All I can say is It looks like a middle school cafeteria. I sat by the door to try to avoid at least some of the paint fumes and EVERYONE coming in was shocked and said something about how bad it looked (including at least one O-6).
JeepGuyC17 Posted August 13, 2010 Posted August 13, 2010 ... I am now going to be doing a YEAR there rocking the glorified conex housing units. I'd actually prefer conex housing units to the billeting at the Deid. Although, being there for a year you'll probably get to live in the "Better Person's Complex"
Guest Posted August 13, 2010 Posted August 13, 2010 Going slightly along with this...why the hell do we insist on wearing eight-point covers in desert locations? That's a Navy-Marine thing. Is everyone doing that now? I remember laughing at the shoe clerk REMFs when they would show up at Bagram in the early days. They wanted to check the BTDT "this one time in COMBAT IN AFGHANISTAN" container and would catch a ride on a C-17 that was passing through. They would strut off the back of jet at 0300 with that stupid hat on like they were MacArthur or something. They wanted to be "shown around" like there was some kind of fucking windshield tour or something. I would tell them "Well, General, this is it. Our jets are over there, the TF helos are over there, obviously this is where we unload the herbivores and the enemy is surrounding us. Don't step off the concrete, the entire airfield is mined and we don't have the assets to adequately clear them especially since we lose at lease one mine clearer or dog every week." They would normally be climbing back on the C-17 0.69 seconds after hearing the word "mine." I never asked them if they ever felt ashamed of that hat when they passed an actual US Marine.
ClearedHot Posted August 13, 2010 Posted August 13, 2010 Our jets are over there, the TF helos are over there, obviously this is where we unload the herbivores and the enemy is surrounding us. Don't step off the concrete, the entire airfield is mined and we don't have the assets to adequately clear them especially since we lose at lease one mine clearer or dog every week." I truly miss those days… just killing the bad guys. Can we go back?
Guest Posted August 13, 2010 Posted August 13, 2010 I truly miss those days just killing the bad guys. Can we go back? Actually, yes...you can. I, however, cannot. The only way I'd ever go back is if I hear you're using your O-6 superpowers patrolling the shitters for guys with their shirts untucked. Seriously, I'm not worried about that. I have confidence you would be fired before you turned into that kind of douchenozzle.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now