BQZip01 Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 There are more than a few USAF personnel, here on McGuire, who cannot tell a KC-10 from a C-17. So...you're saying there's a difference... ...interesting...
Murph Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 Commas, colons, different font sizes, whatev. It looks even better with the squadron sticker (16 SOS) "someone" put on it today.
discus Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 It looks even better with the squadron sticker (16 SOS) "someone" put on it today. Words cannot begin to describe the level of awesome.
M2 Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 Words cannot begin to describe the level of awesome. Concur, it needs to be zapped into oblivion!
pawnman Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 by whom? the same faceless dickless jackasses that instituted the RB policy in the first place? that's the problem with the deid-- one hand shakes the other whenever it comes to "looking into" things. I've NEVER heard anyone not bitch about the RB policy, they always pass the buck to someone else, and their only job is to "enforce the policy". YGBFSM. Generally, people are not apt to enforce a policy they have no interest of belief in. I sure as shit don't, at least when it comes to Deidtardedness. You mean like how, during their last SAV, one of the items that emerged was "BPC was built for people with 24/7 ops and crew rest cycles, you should be putting all aircrew in there even if they aren't at AUAB for 6 months"? Still haven't seen any movement on that one...although you could see Gen Wilson's wheels turning when he was told there were over 2000 rooms, and fewer than 50 flyers in BPC.
TacAirCoug Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 Not to derail the lively reflective belt discussion, but.... ON WHAT F*CKING PLANET IS IT ACCEPTABLE TO REQUIRE A TRANSIENT AIRCREW TO SPEND 45-60 MINUTES PROCESSING THOUGH CUSTOMS JUST TO WE CAN WALK OVER TO BASE OPS TO FILE A GODDAMN FLIGHT PLAN!?!?!?! Fortunately TA was very helpful and kept us from having to endure the pain. Still, at some point someone needs to tell the Qataris to f*ck off.
pawnman Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 Not to derail the lively reflective belt discussion, but.... ON WHAT F*CKING PLANET IS IT ACCEPTABLE TO REQUIRE A TRANSIENT AIRCREW TO SPEND 45-60 MINUTES PROCESSING THOUGH CUSTOMS JUST TO WE CAN WALK OVER TO BASE OPS TO FILE A GODDAMN FLIGHT PLAN!?!?!?! Fortunately TA was very helpful and kept us from having to endure the pain. Still, at some point someone needs to tell the Qataris to f*ck off. The Aussies did...that's why they left.
Guest Hobbit64 Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 (edited) Maybe the belt-pouges are trying to reduce the number of dishes they have to wash by making the experience so miserable. At least you folks don't have to wear different colored belts based on rank to facilitate the salute fest after dark like some Army units. Edited October 26, 2009 by Hobbit64
slacker Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 At least you folks don't have to wear different colored belts based on rank to facilitate the salute fest after dark like some Army units. Quick! Someone delete this before it is read by the wrong eyes.
arg Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 It looks even better with the squadron sticker (16 SOS) "someone" put on it today. PICS....NOW. please?
Pitt4401 Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 Maybe the belt-pouges are trying to reduce the number of dishes they have to wash by making the experience so miserable. At least you folks don't have to wear different colored belts based on rank to facilitate the salute fest after dark like some Army units. If the Army wants to make life difficult for all of us, maybe they should stick to naked detainee pyramid stacking competitions
Champ Kind Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 If the Army wants to make life difficult for all of us, maybe they should stick to naked detainee pyramid stacking competitions I think the Army is already doing a pretty good job of making life difficult by having the Air Force pay their short-manning bill in the form of ILO (I'm sorry, "JET") assignments.
Guest Fogo Posted October 26, 2009 Posted October 26, 2009 It looks even better with the squadron sticker (16 SOS) "someone" put on it today. Sure put a smile on my face this afternoon. I'm with M2... We need to zap that thing to hell.
Guest Hobbit64 Posted October 27, 2009 Posted October 27, 2009 If the Army wants to make life difficult for all of us, maybe they should stick to naked detainee pyramid stacking competitions Kind of low class there pal.
capt4fans Posted October 27, 2009 Posted October 27, 2009 And onto page 75....this thread will never die.
Vertigo Posted October 27, 2009 Posted October 27, 2009 Kind of low class there pal. But funny nonetheless.
JS Posted October 27, 2009 Posted October 27, 2009 PICS....NOW. please? Just saw the sticker last night - fucking classic. I will try and get a picture of it today if it is still there. Side note: I went the entire night without a fag belt as well. Nobody stopped me and I got two servings of food with no questions asked.
Disco_Nav963 Posted October 27, 2009 Posted October 27, 2009 I snagged a pic for my gunship friend Discus last night; I'll put it up later if JS doesn't get to it first.
JS Posted October 27, 2009 Posted October 27, 2009 I snagged a pic for my gunship friend Discus last night; I'll put it up later if JS doesn't get to it first. Since I made a special trip over there for these pics I'll post them. Good thing is that my PT-wearin' captain ass only had to salute 4 senior officers on the 200 yard walk there and back. I mis-typed on my post about the grammar. I guess there is a colon in there, but no comma in the "no reflective belt no service" sentence.
zrooster99 Posted October 27, 2009 Posted October 27, 2009 Interesting that they haven't made any attempt to replace the sign since that pretty much obscures their DB message.
StoleIt Posted October 27, 2009 Posted October 27, 2009 Interesting that they haven't made any attempt to replace the sign since that pretty much obscures their DB message. They are probably drafting a scathing email to all CGO's and making new suplemental policies to outlaw all squadron patches, stickers, and any other form of moral.
zrooster99 Posted October 27, 2009 Posted October 27, 2009 (edited) They are probably drafting a scathing email to all CGO's and making new suplemental policies to outlaw all squadron patches, stickers, and any other form of moral. Wish I could help, but I'm a little further north. Keep up the resistance! Remember the Code: "...I will continue to resist by all means available." Edited October 27, 2009 by zrooster99
capt4fans Posted October 27, 2009 Posted October 27, 2009 (edited) Interesting that they haven't made any attempt to replace the sign since that pretty much obscures their DB message. I want to know why that sign is still there. Why doesn't it disappear every time an aircrew member walks through the door. Then you could simply say..."What sign?" edit cause me no spell good. Edited October 27, 2009 by capt4fans
Guest Fogo Posted October 27, 2009 Posted October 27, 2009 Interesting that they haven't made any attempt to replace the sign since that pretty much obscures their DB message. Just got back from the chow hall and no more sign on the door. Now they have one in front of each of the sign in scanners: "Anyone enterting must have a reflective belt during hours of darkness." or something close to that. I am sure they are loving their ability to "show us" and not have it say anything about no service. So now when I see someone getting hassled in the line, shouldn't I ask the young airman why they weren't at the door catching violators in the act?
BQZip01 Posted October 28, 2009 Posted October 28, 2009 Since I made a special trip over there for these pics I'll post them. Good thing is that my PT-wearin' captain ass only had to salute 4 senior officers on the 200 yard walk there and back. I mis-typed on my post about the grammar. I guess there is a colon in there, but no comma in the "no reflective belt no service" sentence. Nicely done...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now