WTF? (**NSFW**)

[ThreeHoler]

[Royal]

I think this or something similar may have been posted already, but due to my dislike for "journalists," it deserves to be seen again:

[JarheadBoom]

Been seeing this on a billboard on my way to work for several weeks now. Finally checked it out... wow.

Responsible Policies for Animals

[M2]

I think this or something similar may have been posted already, but due to my dislike for "journalists," it deserves to be seen again:

Great compilation, but it's missing one...

[Royal]

Great compilation, but it's missing one...

That would've been a real bummer if it had been a wasp...and he left his epinephrine pen at home.

[ClearedHot]

[Fuzz]

Will this song ever die??? The marine parody was bad enough...

[matmacwc]

Will this song ever die??? The marine parody was bad enough...

I now need a half bottle of jack to get that video out of my head, I should have know better.

[Day Man]

I now need a half bottle of jack to get that video out of my head, I should have know better.

are you out of good booze?

[Fuzz]

https://www.dogheirs.com/dogheirs/posts/1982-single-mom-asks-public-for-support-after-dog-bites-alleged-home-intruder

"If an intruder broke into your house while you were away, would you hope that your dog would defend your home? What would you do if you were then accused of being an irresponsible dog owner and charged with the crime of failing to confine your dog? Even worse, what if your loyal, protective dog was then labelled "dangerous"? A single mother of a 2-year-old boy named Kaleb and a 4.5-year-old American Bulldog mix named Duke, is at risk of losing everything she has because she says that this is exactly what happened to her while she was at work in Toledo, Ohio. Now, Carissa Curry is facing criminal charges and Duke has been labelled a "dangerous dog"."

[sky_king]

https://www.dogheirs....d-home-intruder

"If an intruder broke into your house while you were away, would you hope that your dog would defend your home? What would you do if you were then accused of being an irresponsible dog owner and charged with the crime of failing to confine your dog? Even worse, what if your loyal, protective dog was then labelled "dangerous"? A single mother of a 2-year-old boy named Kaleb and a 4.5-year-old American Bulldog mix named Duke, is at risk of losing everything she has because she says that this is exactly what happened to her while she was at work in Toledo, Ohio. Now, Carissa Curry is facing criminal charges and Duke has been labelled a "dangerous dog"."

American laws for fucking stupid. Break in to a house and steal a bunch of shit? Win! Break in to a house and get bitten by a dog? Win! Laws like this were created without thinking of unintended consequences. Hopefully, the judge will see the rediculousness of this case and throw out the parts that don't make sense. Like the homeowner's right to protect their property. Even if that means with a dog.

[Kilgore Trout]

Will this song ever die??? The marine parody was bad enough...

You've got to believe this was a well thought out plan by a bunch of dudes to meet the Miami Dolphins cheerleaders when they return home. Parody their video, thank them for inspiring them, show how crappy Afghanistan is, come home and win... At least one of them will get lucky when they have the mixer.

[Fuzz]

You've got to believe this was a well thought out plan by a bunch of dudes to meet the Miami Dolphins cheerleaders when they return home. Parody their video, thank them for inspiring them, show how crappy Afghanistan is, come home and win... At least one of them will get lucky when they have the mixer.

Wish them the best

[sky_king]

I agree. The parody is gay, but the possible tail would make it worth it.

[contraildash]

The best conversation in human history....(NSFW?)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVBYwntkiFA

Edited November 18, 2012 by contraildash

[Butters]

American laws for fucking stupid. Break in to a house and steal a bunch of shit? Win! Break in to a house and get bitten by a dog? Win! Laws like this were created without thinking of unintended consequences. Hopefully, the judge will see the rediculousness of this case and throw out the parts that don't make sense. Like the homeowner's right to protect their property. Even if that means with a dog.

Did you read the article? The guy said he was walking down the street and the dog got out and bit him. Yes, he is full of shit, but you make it sound like she is being charged for the guy breaking in and getting bit in the house. That is not what they were told, so she now has to prove the guy broke in.

[Fuzz]

Did you read the article? The guy said he was walking down the street and the dog got out and bit him. Yes, he is full of shit, but you make it sound like she is being charged for the guy breaking in and getting bit in the house. That is not what they were told, so she now has to prove the guy broke in.

Did you really read the article or just the first 3 paragraphs?

She searched the house and began to fear the worst. Carissa then noticed that her front door was ajar. Confused, she found a note pinned to the door from the Lucas County dog warden with a phone number to call. Toledo Police then received a second 911 call from Carissa herself, who was calling to report a B&E (Breaking and Entering).

Just after Carissa called the police, Bernadine (Bernie) Tammarine, the fiance of Carissa's next-door neighbor, approached her. Bernie had witnessed the events that day while Carissa was at work. Bernie relayed that she had even spoken to a police officer at the time of the incident, telling him that she had seen the man inside Carissa's yard before Duke had bitten him. In a written statement, Bernie claims that she saw the man walking quickly from the open driveway gates of Carissa's home to the opposite side of the street. She heard the man say that Duke had bitten him and when she asked him where he was bitten, the man responded by saying that Duke had followed him across the street to bite him. Bernie added that, "At no time did I ever see Duke leave the yard even as the gates were open....I never remembered hearing Duke bark until I went outside and noticed this man crossing the street. Duke still remained in his yard barking profusely at this man."

Edited November 18, 2012 by Scaredfuzz21

[Butters]

Did you really read the article or just the first 3 paragraphs?

A bunch of quoted lines proving you are dumber than shit....

Yes, I read the whole article. There are several conflicting stories. The guy that was bit got to complain first, now everyone has to prove the guy broke in. Coming home to find your 'Door ajar" does not prove someone broke in. You probably voted for Obama so you may not realize that people can leave door ajar and their dogs can get out.

I believe the woman, but unfortunately this is not "Nam", there are rules. She needs to prove all this in court and she will be fine. There is no "law" that says if someone breaks into your house and the dog bites them you get in trouble. The guy said he was bit "outside". Not sure what part of that you do not understand.

Edited November 19, 2012 by Butters

[Fuzz]

Yes, I read the whole article. There are several conflicting stories. The guy that was bit got to complain first, now everyone has to prove the guy broke in. Coming home to find your 'Door ajar" does not prove someone broke in. You probably voted for Obama so you may not realize that people can leave door ajar and their dogs can get out.

I believe the woman, but unfortunately this is not "Nam", there are rules. She needs to prove all this in court and she will be fine. There is no "law" that says if someone breaks into your house and the dog bites them you get in trouble. The guy said he was bit "outside". Not sure what part of that you do not understand.

The douche bag changed his story 3 times and a neighbor said he was in the yard. What part of that don't you understand???

You probably voted for Obama so you may not realize that people can leave door ajar and their dogs can get out.

Thanks a-hole, I've got two dogs, and never left the door open when I've left the house.

ETA: I'm sure if you read else where on BO, you'll find out real quick who I did or didn't vote for.

Edited November 19, 2012 by Scaredfuzz21

[HU&W]

Voldemort the goat traps a boy in a tree.

[Fuzz]

You cant make this shit up:

https://hosted.ap.org...-11-18-15-45-34

San Francisco may be getting ready to shed its image as a city where anything goes, including clothing. City lawmakers are scheduled to vote Tuesday on an ordinance that would prohibit nudity in most public places, a blanket ban that represents an escalation of a two-year tiff between a devoted group of men who strut their stuff through the city's famously gay Castro District and the supervisor who represents the area.

Supervisor Scott Wiener's proposal would make it illegal for a person over the age of 5 to "expose his or her genitals, perineum or anal region on any public street, sidewalk, street median, parklet or plaza" or while using public transit. A first offense would carry a maximum penalty of a $100 fine, but prosecutors would have authority to charge a third violation as a misdemeanor punishable by up to a $500 fine and a year in jail. Exemptions would be made for participants at permitted street fairs and parades, such as the city's annual gay pride event and the Folsom Street Fair, which celebrates sadomasochism and other sexual subcultures. Wiener said he resisted introducing the ordinance, but felt compelled to act after constituents complained about the naked men who gather in a small Castro plaza most days and sometimes walk the streets au naturel. He persuaded his colleagues last year to pass a law requiring a cloth to be placed between public seating and bare rears, yet the complaints have continued. "I don't think having some guys taking their clothes off and hanging out seven days a week at Castro and Market Street is really what San Francisco is about. I think it's a caricature of what San Francisco is about," Wiener said.

The proposed ban predictably has produced outrage, as well as a lawsuit. Last week, about two dozen people disrobed in front of City Hall and marched around the block to the amusement of gawking tourists and high school students on a field trip. Stripped down to his sunglasses and hiking boots, McCray Winpsett, 37, said he understands the disgust of residents who would prefer not to see the body modifications and sex enhancement devices sported by some of the Castro nudists. But he thinks Wiener's prohibition goes too far in undermining a tradition "that keeps San Francisco weird." "A few lewd exhibitionists are really ruining it for the rest of us," he said. "It's my time to come out now to present myself in a light and show what true nudity is all about so people can separate the difference between what a nudist is and an exhibitionist is." Because clothes are required to enter City Hall itself, demonstrators who try to disrobe at the Board of Supervisors meeting will be escorted out by sheriff's deputies. That is what happened last Monday when Gypsy Taub removed her dress at a committee hearing where the ban had its first public hearing. Taub, a mother of two, said she got her start as a nudist while hosting a local cable program devoted to the theory that the government was behind the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. "I thought if I take my clothes off, I bet they are going to listen," she said.

San Francisco lawyer Christina DiEdoardo filed a federal lawsuit last week on behalf of Taub and three men that seeks to block Weiner's ordinance, if it passes and is signed by Mayor Edwin Lee. The complaint alleges that the ban infringes on the free speech rights of nudists and discriminates against those who cannot afford to obtain a city permit. While it may seem strange that going out in the buff is not already illegal in San Francisco, most California cities do not have local nudity laws, Wiener said. Instead, they are adequately covered by state indecent exposure laws and societal mores. But indecent exposure technically only applies to lewd behavior, so city officials have had to craft a local solution, he said, adding that the cities of Berkeley and San Jose already have done so. "I suspect there are a lot of places that maybe don't currently have a local law (and) that if people started getting naked every day would quickly see a local law," Wiener said.

[slackline]

I don't care how it's spelled, the guy trying to block nudity is named Weiner...

[spaceman]

That is what happened last Monday when Gypsy Taub removed her dress at a committee hearing where the ban had its first public hearing. Taub, a mother of two, said she got her start as a nudist while hosting a local cable program devoted to the theory that the government was behind the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. "I thought if I take my clothes off, I bet they are going to listen," she said.

This part just screams WTF. Her two kids will definitely turn out normal.

[Fuzz]

I don't care how it's spelled, the guy trying to block nudity is named Weiner...

Yeah I thought that was irony at its finest.

[raimius]

"I thought if I take my clothes off, I bet they are going to listen," she said.

Ah, yes, that age old tactic for women to have their intellectual arguments taken seriously...