HercDude Posted August 22, 2014 Posted August 22, 2014 Some people just don't like the sound of freedom ruining their lavish ocean front lifestyle. https://www.10news.com/news/man-says-helicopters-flew-close-to-his-ocean-beach-home-08192014 Also the Navy and Army totally dimed us out on this one. He feels "victimized"?!? There isn't enough sand in California to fill that guys vagina. 2
Vertigo Posted August 22, 2014 Posted August 22, 2014 But the Pentagon allows troops to march in non-military gay pride parades while in uniform. I guess it all depends on the cause...ALS is not progressive enough of a cause I suppose. Is a gay pride parade supporting a position or a specific company? It's a fuzzy line for sure, but there is a distinction.
chim richalds Posted August 22, 2014 Posted August 22, 2014 Can we stop with the jet noise=freedom bullshit? I guess the Chinese and soviets only flew turboprops Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 5
discus Posted August 23, 2014 Posted August 23, 2014 (edited) Is a gay pride parade supporting a position or a specific company? Edited August 23, 2014 by discus 2
Vertigo Posted August 23, 2014 Posted August 23, 2014 (edited) image.jpgimage.jpg Looks like you're in for a good weekend. Not judging. Do you squeeze it in straight or sideways? Edited August 23, 2014 by Vertigo
backseatdriver Posted August 23, 2014 Posted August 23, 2014 I'm pretty sure I didn't get the exact joke/flavor of sarcasm--my bad, it's Friday, and I'm tired. My point was that if he is going to quote restrictions out of the FAR, then he should quote the one that applies to helicopters, not to fixed wing aircraft (which has nothing to do with the AF). But you're right, I wouldn't talk to either of them, that's what PA gets paid to do. No worries - I was quoting the angry citizen about why he couldn't voice his concerns to the military. Bad comedy on my part - if you have to explain the joke... 1
Vito Posted August 23, 2014 Posted August 23, 2014 Couple of years back, We had to take an irrate "citizen" and a State Representitive on a 3-Ship airdrop training mission to show the irrate citizen that we weren't targeting his house when we flew over it. We kissed his ass and put on a great dog and pony show for him. After the flight he thanked us for our service, told us he was impressed with our skills and two months later he started complaining again! DB's
TreeA10 Posted August 23, 2014 Posted August 23, 2014 Sounds like you dropped the wrong item out of your jet. 6
BFM this Posted August 25, 2014 Posted August 25, 2014 Starting at the top left: Is that some sort of Flock of Seaguls reboot?
Spinner Posted August 25, 2014 Posted August 25, 2014 She has a new boyfriend every 72 hours? Looks like she eats a new boyfriend every 72 hours. 1
guineapigfury Posted August 25, 2014 Posted August 25, 2014 Starting at the top left: Is that some sort of Flock of Seaguls reboot? Almost but not quite:
HeloDude Posted August 25, 2014 Posted August 25, 2014 Oops. But if not for a big government, who will build the roads?
Vertigo Posted August 26, 2014 Posted August 26, 2014 But if not for a big government, who will build the roads? Not helping the argument since these lines were put down by a private contractor...
HeloDude Posted August 26, 2014 Posted August 26, 2014 Not helping the argument since these lines were put down by a private contractor... Definitely helps the argument as the people who pay for/oversee the work fall under control of the government. When government is in charge there is less incentive to ensure things are done correctly vs when financed privately. Business owners and shareholders are much more careful with their money than the government is with theirs (or should I say, with ours).
Vertigo Posted August 27, 2014 Posted August 27, 2014 Definitely helps the argument as the people who pay for/oversee the work fall under control of the government. When government is in charge there is less incentive to ensure things are done correctly vs when financed privately. Business owners and shareholders are much more careful with their money than the government is with theirs (or should I say, with ours). If the government was picking up the tab for the re-work I would agree. However I would think it is safe to assume the private company will have to pay out of pocket to fix their mistake- so they weren't more careful with their money or the taxpayers money.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now