Toro Posted June 17, 2017 Posted June 17, 2017 8 hours ago, ToyotaMC1 said: https://www.google.com/amp/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4589622/amp/Teacher-charged-having-sex-three-male-students.html I love Adam Carolla's take on this: "I would make the ultimate defense attorney for one of these teachers because they always do these ones where they have this two year affairs with the guys in the 10th grade through their Senior year blah blah blah and they’re like hot blondes and they’re out of Florida and blah blah blah blah blah blah. Then at some point it ends up in court and the prosecutor starts talking about irreparable damage and psychological damage and this boy’s gonna need therapy for the rest of his life and he’s not gonna trust women, he’s not gonna trust adults… I would let him wax on forever and then I’d go, "I got one question and one question only for the victim of this crime. You’re nineteen now. This went on from fifteen to seventeen" "Yes." "Since it stopped until now have you ever beat off to it? "Uh yes. Earlier today." "We’re done." 3
TreeA10 Posted June 27, 2017 Posted June 27, 2017 Bikini contest to pick the summer intern at a power plant!! https://www.cnet.com/news/power-company-holds-facebook-bikini-contest-to-choose-interns/?ftag=COS-05-10aaa0h&utm_campaign=trueAnthem%3A+Trending+Content&utm_content=595035e6a167da00074f55a3&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=facebook
Guest Posted June 27, 2017 Posted June 27, 2017 I, for one, am appalled. We hear all this talk about how we need more women in STEM, and what does the internet do when 10 brave women express a desire to work in nuclear energy? It's disgraceful, really.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
sqwatch Posted June 27, 2017 Posted June 27, 2017 I, for one, am appalled. We hear all this talk about how we need more women in STEM, and what does the internet do when 10 brave women express a desire to work in nuclear energy? It's disgraceful, really.Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkWould you say you're offended? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Herk Driver Posted June 28, 2017 Posted June 28, 2017 I, for one, am appalled. We hear all this talk about how we need more women in STEM, and what does the internet do when 10 brave women express a desire to work in nuclear energy? It's disgraceful, really.Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkAre the Czechs replacing their nuclear "fuel rods" now after this episode?Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums
Orbit Posted June 28, 2017 Posted June 28, 2017 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40438207 A Minnesota woman has been charged over the fatal shooting of her boyfriend, in what authorities say was a social media stunt gone wrong. Monalisa Perez, 19, was booked into county jail after shooting at Pedro Ruiz as he held a book to his chest, believing it would stop the bullet. The couple's three-year-old child and nearly 30 onlookers watched as she fired the fatal bullet into his chest. Ruiz's aunt said they did it to increase their social media following. County Attorney James Brue described the book as a hardcover encyclopedia, and said the weapon used was a .50-calibre Desert Eagle handgun.
SurelySerious Posted June 29, 2017 Posted June 29, 2017 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40438207 A Minnesota woman has been charged over the fatal shooting of her boyfriend, in what authorities say was a social media stunt gone wrong. Monalisa Perez, 19, was booked into county jail after shooting at Pedro Ruiz as he held a book to his chest, believing it would stop the bullet. The couple's three-year-old child and nearly 30 onlookers watched as she fired the fatal bullet into his chest. Ruiz's aunt said they did it to increase their social media following. County Attorney James Brue described the book as a hardcover encyclopedia, and said the weapon used was a .50-calibre Desert Eagle handgun.They really started at an extreme there.
Guest Posted June 29, 2017 Posted June 29, 2017 They should have used Atlas Shrugged, easily would have stopped a .50AESent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
JeremiahWeed Posted June 29, 2017 Posted June 29, 2017 15 hours ago, Orbit said: The couple's three-year-old child and nearly 30 onlookers watched as she fired the fatal bullet into his chest. UFB... What amazes me is that out of 30 people there wasn't one with some even basic physics knowledge that might have said, "Uh.....wait just a sec......." At least there's one therapist on the planet with a job for life when the 3-year old gets older. 1
nunya Posted June 29, 2017 Posted June 29, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, ihtfp06 said: They should have used Atlas Shrugged, easily would have stopped a .50AE Or the uniform AFI. Haven't read it myself, but I heard it's wordy. Edited June 29, 2017 by nunya 1
Smokin Posted June 30, 2017 Posted June 30, 2017 Shooter's name is Monalisa... that should be enough said as to why no one figured out this was a bad idea.
BashiChuni Posted June 30, 2017 Posted June 30, 2017 found by a friend on base this week...while parked in an 0-6 reserved spot nice....air medal?!..........sir.... if he flew in vietnam or earlier he gets a pass....OIF/OEF....not so much
Guest Posted June 30, 2017 Posted June 30, 2017 Well, which is worse: the OEF/OIF era O-6 pilot who needs everyone to know about his Air Medal, or the OEF/OIF era O-6 pilot who somehow managed to avoid flying 20 combat sorties? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
sqwatch Posted June 30, 2017 Posted June 30, 2017 found by a friend on base this week...while parked in an 0-6 reserved spot nice....air medal?!..........sir.... if he flew in vietnam or earlier he gets a pass....OIF/OEF....not so muchI wonder what the story is behind that air medal. Anyway, it takes more to offend me these days than some old retired colonel being proud of his military service. Fortunately I'll never make colonel, so I probably won't offend the snaps if I park at the ass end of the BX parking lot with my OIF ribbon on my truck with the rest of the crusty majors. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
herkbum Posted June 30, 2017 Posted June 30, 2017 Some uninformed state rep here pushed for and passed for Air Medal license plates. The great thing about them and why I got one is that they were free and permanent, never have to be renewed. The entire OG went and got them. They went back and amended the law and now you have to pay for them. Here's to being grandfathered in Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums 1
BashiChuni Posted June 30, 2017 Posted June 30, 2017 Oh trust me I'm not offended...it just makes me chuckle
sqwatch Posted July 1, 2017 Posted July 1, 2017 Some uninformed state rep here pushed for and passed for Air Medal license plates. The great thing about them and why I got one is that they were free and permanent, never have to be renewed. The entire OG went and got them. They went back and amended the law and now you have to pay for them. Here's to being grandfathered in Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network ForumsThat's awesome Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
TreeA10 Posted July 1, 2017 Posted July 1, 2017 Here in Texas, a medal license plate to include the air medal, will get you free parking at the terminal so you don't have to park in the employee lot and wait to ride the bus with the cast of thousands. 3
M2 Posted July 1, 2017 Posted July 1, 2017 Technically, he's breaking Florida law... Title XXIII MOTOR VEHICLES Chapter 320 MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSES View Entire Chapter 320.061 Unlawful to alter motor vehicle registration certificates, license plates, temporary license plates, mobile home stickers, or validation stickers or to obscure license plates; penalty.—A person may not alter the original appearance of a vehicle registration certificate, license plate, temporary license plate, mobile home sticker, or validation sticker issued for and assigned to a motor vehicle or mobile home, whether by mutilation, alteration, defacement, or change of color or in any other manner. A person may not apply or attach a substance, reflective matter, illuminated device, spray, coating, covering, or other material onto or around any license plate which interferes with the legibility, angular visibility, or detectability of any feature or detail on the license plate or interferes with the ability to record any feature or detail on the license plate. A person who violates this section commits a noncriminal traffic infraction, punishable as a moving violation as provided in chapter 318. History.—s. 9, ch. 28186, 1953; s. 3, ch. 69-178; s. 192, ch. 71-136; s. 3, ch. 72-79; s. 7, ch. 77-357; s. 15, ch. 83-318; s. 33, ch. 96-413; s. 23, ch. 2007-196; s. 25, ch. 2010-162; s. 32, ch. 2012-181. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now