Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 hours ago, Vertigo said:

So because I'm able to understand progressives arguments (not that I agree with them) that labels me as a progressive. Noted.

I guess I should stop trying to understand the viewpoint of others and only speak in the echo chamber of libertarianism or risk having others label me.

You're defending the argument for more gun control while not defending the argument for zero gun control...so yes, you're a progressive.  When you start acting like a libertarian then I'll believe you're a libertarian.  

  • Like 3
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Out looking for the tactical egg I gather?

My bud was on the watch floor last night, had to BLUF it up for the Big Boss. Possible O2 contamination? Chem trail conspiracy? 

ATIS

 

  • Upvote 1
Posted

https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/17/politics/navy-aircrew-obscene-skywriting/index.html

Navy "Air Boss" Vice Adm. Mike Shoemaker issued a sharp rebuke of the crew's actions and emphasized the service's commitment to "foster an environment of dignity and respect." .... "Sophomoric and immature antics of a sexual nature have no place in Naval aviation today," Shoemaker said in a written statement. ...."The Navy holds its aircrew to the highest standards and we find this absolutely unacceptable, of zero training value and we are holding the crew accountable," a statement from the Navy air station said.

How do you say that with a straight face?

Picasso...Rembrandt...Van Gough...Sky Dong.  That's one for the ages.  You win this round Navy.

  • Like 1
Posted

They must be overmanned to afford to kick out a pilot/wso for that stunt. The military can’t correctly sentence a deserter during wartime or properly report felony convictions which leads to the murders of innocents, but we sure as fvck can fry a couple of aviators for playing a joke.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 3
Posted

They need to make this about "a cause."  For example, wear a vagina hat and you are sending a message and applauded.  These guys need to say they were showing solidarity with prostate or testicular cancer victims or something along those lines.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, herkbum said:

I heard they are facing an FEB this coming Monday. Sounds like the USN means business. 

If true, this could make an appearance in the conversation going on in the "Being masculine is bad" thread.  An FEB for this, really....better do something visible!  Hope this is just some bad rumor being floated.  

Sir, I was trying out a figure 8 cap, committed down track, red air drug, I aborted and returned to the hold.  

Posted
1 hour ago, herkbum said:

I heard they are facing an FEB this coming Monday. Sounds like the USN means business. 

Should be front page Navy times with an update on pilot manning crisis below the fold.

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, HuggyU2 said:

Unconfirmed word is that it was the skipper: CDR “Tess” Stickles. 

Confirmed- it’s actually “Tess” Tickle. One of ours was a RAG IP with him. 

Edited by herkbum
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, herkbum said:

I heard they are facing an FEB this coming Monday. Sounds like the USN means business. 

#1.  The USN does not have FEBs, they have Field Naval Aviator Evaluation Boards (FNAEBs).

#2.  If a FNAEB was decided upon, organized, and scheduled to begin less than 5 days after an event, that would be an unprecedented accomplishment for any bureaucracy.  A competent attorney would have a field day defending someone who was being railroaded on that timetable.  In the AF, there are multiple stops along the timeline that makes initiating an FEB in much less than 60-90 days nearly impossible.

Edited by Hacker
  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Hacker said:

#1.  The USN does not have FEBs, they have Field Naval Aviator Evaluation Boards (FNAEBs).

#2.  If a FNAEB was decided upon, organized, and scheduled to begin less than 5 days after an event, that would be an unprecedented accomplishment for any bureaucracy.  A competent attorney would have a field day defending someone who was being railroaded on that timetable.  In the AF, there are multiple stops along the timeline that makes initiating an FEB in much less than 60-90 days nearly impossible.

Whatever they call it, I was told this has CNO interest/oversight

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...