CDAWG Posted August 27, 2013 Posted August 27, 2013 (edited) Another question for those who have spent some time in a U-28 squadron. What is it like to be in a U-28 squadron that might be different from other airframes? For example, I've met a few C-5 Aircrew members who have mentioned they are really laid back with members of their squadron since they are on the road for long periods of time, and feel comfortable calling a full bird (Their Squadron Commander) by their first name in uniform, to include enlisted men. (Not Judging) . The KC-10 guys from what I notice seem to like the image of them being perceived as the "Gucci Boys". There is a squadron at Travis AFB where some of them choose to wear sunglasses that are blatantly out of regs. (Again, Not Judging I thought it was interesting) Edit: Spelling. Edited August 27, 2013 by CDAWG
nsplayr Posted August 27, 2013 Posted August 27, 2013 I was curious if there is a nickname for the U-28A aircraft, or if the aircrew call it something unofficially? Combat Platypus was suggested to LtGen Fiel...just sayin'...
scudrunner12 Posted August 27, 2013 Posted August 27, 2013 Another question for those who have spent some time in a U-28 squadron. What is it like to be in a U-28 squadron that might be different from other airframes? For example, I've met a few C-5 Aircrew members who have mentioned they are really laid back with members of their squadron since they are on the road for long periods of time, and feel comfortable calling a full bird by their first name in uniform, to include enlisted men. (Not Judging) . Or for the KC-10 guys from what I notice seem like the image of them being perceived as the "Gucci Boys". There is a squadron at Travis AFB where some of them choose to wear sunglasses that are blatantly out of regs. (Again, Not Judging I thought it was interesting) It was my first ops assignment so take this FWIW, but I don't know if I'll ever experience a better community. Extemely, extremly close knit group. It was the best combination of professionalism, cameradiere, and just dudes being dudes. I think it may also a side effect of AFSOC/SOCOM that although we never speak boastfully about what we do, everyone knows it's incredibly important work which helps keep everyone in check. The subdued patches, sunglasses and huge watches also help. Not so much on the full bird, first name thing (ref: professionalism). Still über chill though. 1
Danger41 Posted August 28, 2013 Posted August 28, 2013 Another question for those who have spent some time in a U-28 squadron. What is it like to be in a U-28 squadron that might be different from other airframes? For example, I've met a few C-5 Aircrew members who have mentioned they are really laid back with members of their squadron since they are on the road for long periods of time, and feel comfortable calling a full bird (Their Squadron Commander) by their first name in uniform, to include enlisted men. (Not Judging) . The KC-10 guys from what I notice seem to like the image of them being perceived as the "Gucci Boys". There is a squadron at Travis AFB where some of them choose to wear sunglasses that are blatantly out of regs. (Again, Not Judging I thought it was interesting) Edit: Spelling. Definitely a chill organization of very professional guys. It's amazing how the most high time dudes are bros to the young bucks. There is also hardly any hazing of the new guys since they will be out the door in a few weeks with the rest of the squadron cutting their teeth all around the world. I've seen multiple CSO's and young pilots with over 1,000 combat hours before pinning on Captain. Hard to hassle that guy as an FNG. First names are used like call signs in a fighter squadron. 90% get the first name treatment except the Lt Col's and other leadership types.
Combat Platypus Posted August 30, 2013 Posted August 30, 2013 Combat Platypus was suggested to LtGen Fiel...just sayin'... I wonder who coined that one? 2
disgruntledemployee Posted August 31, 2013 Posted August 31, 2013 Combat Platypus, yep tha's a good name for the plane. Yeah, I like to say that I fly the Combat Herc. Hey, does anyone fly the Combat Bone? Combat Falcon? Combat Hog? Combat Buff? Combat Barney? Combat Fred? Combat Eagle? Combat Wacker? Combat Extender? Now, I'm just laughing like a 3rd grader. Out 1
Danger41 Posted August 31, 2013 Posted August 31, 2013 I always thought "Combat Gnat" was a good one.
Gravedigger Posted August 31, 2013 Posted August 31, 2013 Hmm, I'm not sure the last 60 years support that claim.
Disco_Nav963 Posted August 31, 2013 Posted August 31, 2013 Hmm, I'm not sure the last 60 years support that claim. 1990-91: Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm 1996: Operation Desert Strike 1998: Operation Desert Fox 1999: Operation Noble Anvil 2001-06: Operation Enduring Freedom 2003-06: Operation Iraqi Freedom After late 2007... Got a little busy cleaning up some messes at home. From a fiscal standpoint (cost of tanker bridge from FJDG compared to BONEs operating from closer in theater, plus carrying fewer 1760 weapons at present) and a training standpoint (we integrated the ATP in the ops squadrons later and we don't maintain CMR in our MR10C mission, Armed Overwatch; not to mention, the nuke inspections are pretty important) I can't argue the division of labor (BONES in AFCENT/BUFFs in PACAF) that emerged after 2006. The day will come when someone needs bombers in an established theater for more than a day or two, and we'll get a call (and by my count, we've gotten teased on that call three times since 2009). Until then I'm going to keep preparing myself and not b*tch... too much. Sorry for the thread derail.
zrooster99 Posted September 8, 2013 Posted September 8, 2013 Another question for those who have spent some time in a U-28 squadron. What is it like to be in a U-28 squadron that might be different from other airframes? For example, I've met a few C-5 Aircrew members who have mentioned they are really laid back with members of their squadron since they are on the road for long periods of time, and feel comfortable calling a full bird (Their Squadron Commander) by their first name in uniform, to include enlisted men. (Not Judging) . The KC-10 guys from what I notice seem to like the image of them being perceived as the "Gucci Boys". There is a squadron at Travis AFB where some of them choose to wear sunglasses that are blatantly out of regs. (Again, Not Judging I thought it was interesting) Edit: Spelling. There's no such thing as a full bird SQ/CC, to my knowledge, and I'm not sure what you mean by "non-regulation" sunglasses, but since per 11-202v3 the only authorized sunglasses are the Avaitor style ones, 95% of the AF flying community wear non-regulation sunglasses. I bet they didn't call an O6 by his first name, either. Closest I've seen is using callsigns, and not in a heavy squadron.Combat Platypus, yep tha's a good name for the plane. Yeah, I like to say that I fly the Combat Herc. Hey, does anyone fly the Combat Bone? Combat Falcon? Combat Hog? Combat Buff? Combat Barney? Combat Fred? Combat Eagle? Combat Wacker? Combat Extender? Now, I'm just laughing like a 3rd grader. Out It's a play off "Combat Wombat" (could be a play off Combat Talon) which is a play off "Combat Spear" which is what the now AC-130W was going to be called originally. You, at one time, had Combat Shadows, Combat Talons, and Combat Spears, so it would have fit the AFSOC naming convention...sort of. If you don't know what you're talking about, maybe you don't be sarcastic...
disgruntledemployee Posted September 8, 2013 Posted September 8, 2013 If you need "combat" in your airplane name because it makes you feel a certain way, have at it. Try not to take yourself so seriously, warrior. Out
Combat Platypus Posted September 8, 2013 Posted September 8, 2013 We are off topic now but the C-145 is now officially the Combat Coyote
WeatherManC130 Posted September 8, 2013 Posted September 8, 2013 Hasn't that been taken already? Is this a photoshop or did they actually do this?
Azimuth Posted September 8, 2013 Posted September 8, 2013 Is this a photoshop or did they actually do this? That was one of the original paint schemes. The KC-135 had it as well. Admin edit: Picture was flagged as living on a hostile domain. Fox 3!
JarheadBoom Posted September 8, 2013 Posted September 8, 2013 (edited) edit: Nevermind. Reading comprehension fail. Edited September 8, 2013 by JarheadBoom
zrooster99 Posted September 9, 2013 Posted September 9, 2013 If you need "combat" in your airplane name because it makes you feel a certain way, have at it. Try not to take yourself so seriously, warrior. Out LOL! Wow...
SurelySerious Posted September 9, 2013 Posted September 9, 2013 It's called heritage...and in this day in age we'll take it any way we can get it! "Combat X" is what AFSOC considers heritage? Good God.
FlyinGrunt Posted September 9, 2013 Posted September 9, 2013 Disagree. Spectre and Spooky are still just that. And the J is not gonna have "combat" either, at least according to LTG Fiel.
drewpey Posted September 9, 2013 Posted September 9, 2013 Disagree. Spectre and Spooky are still just that. And the J is not gonna have "combat" either, at least according to LTG Fiel. You can try to distance the gunship from the "combat" heritage all you want, but the AC-119 project was codenamed "Combat Hornet". The Spooky and Spectre had their programs named differently IIRC, and it wasn't adopted for whatever reason. "Combat X" is what AFSOC considers heritage? Good God. Is it ALL of the AFSOC heritage? Certainly not. Is it part of it? Without a doubt. I didn't name the projects, and neither did anyone who flies the planes now, but it doesn't mean we have any reason to snub what heritage is there just because it isn't deemed "cool". Many MDSs have nods to their predecessors in their aircraft or project name: PAVE, SENIOR, RIVET, etc. For whatever reason "Combat" was chosen by the folks back then for some of AFSOC's programs. It is what it is, get over it. I personally think we should name every AFSOC aircraft "Combat ____". Not for heritage's sake, but because of the unfathomable amount of sand it packs into peoples' vaginas. 1
StoleIt Posted September 9, 2013 Posted September 9, 2013 Some of you must be having an aneurysm then when talking about this jet... 1
zrooster99 Posted September 11, 2013 Posted September 11, 2013 You can try to distance the gunship from the "combat" heritage all you want, but the AC-119 project was codenamed "Combat Hornet". The Spooky and Spectre had their programs named differently IIRC, and it wasn't adopted for whatever reason. Is it ALL of the AFSOC heritage? Certainly not. Is it part of it? Without a doubt. I didn't name the projects, and neither did anyone who flies the planes now, but it doesn't mean we have any reason to snub what heritage is there just because it isn't deemed "cool". Many MDSs have nods to their predecessors in their aircraft or project name: PAVE, SENIOR, RIVET, etc. For whatever reason "Combat" was chosen by the folks back then for some of AFSOC's programs. It is what it is, get over it. I personally think we should name every AFSOC aircraft "Combat ____". Not for heritage's sake, but because of the unfathomable amount of sand it packs into peoples' vaginas. Shack, but I'll go further. I wasn't defending the naming convention. The "Combat Platipus" was meant as a joke just like "Combat Wombat" was. Apparently some people have some personal issues...there was one hell of an overreaction to this shit... The real U-28 nickname is "Combat TBD"...if it's not replaced first.
Fozzy Bear Posted September 18, 2013 Posted September 18, 2013 Of course it was a joke, but when the 3 star asks the serious question of what the name should be, and that is the answer he gets, well... no one should be pissed when that becomes the actual, stupid name.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now