Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was appalled at first as well, and this MSgt definitely showed lack of judgement for posting this on her FB page. If she wanted her kids to see it, it didn’t need to be up on social media. However, I think effectively terminating her service and not allowing her to re-enlist and serve to retirement is not the right decision. Was everyone at Dover involved in the tasteless picture taken with the transfer case fired from the service? She made a mistake and should be punished, but senior leaders have raped people and received less. She and her kids should not suffer because of one stupid mistake.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 3
Posted
that's not how the air force world works though...
Well, your world. Good to know there are perfect people out there like you, sure you must be proud.
  • Downvote 1
Posted
6 hours ago, BADFNZ said:

The audience it reaches should have ZERO bearing on the punishment. 

Like a private, homemade porn video, that somehow ends up on the internet?  With a male officer and two enlisted gals? 

Posted
6 hours ago, WTFAF said:
10 hours ago, BashiChuni said:
that's not how the air force world works though...

Well, your world. Good to know there are perfect people out there like you, sure you must be proud.

Lol

Posted
5 hours ago, HuggyU2 said:

Like a private, homemade porn video, that somehow ends up on the internet?  With a male officer and two enlisted gals? 

I would need to see said video before making any further judgement.

But if this was an honest question, yes.  As a CC, if I found out one of my O's made a sex tape with a couple of E's, my punishment of that individual would be the same whether I was the only one to see the video or if it was posted on the Google home page.  I'm not saying leaders think this way today, but like I said, the audience should have no bearing on the punishment.

Posted
Like a private, homemade porn video, that somehow ends up on the internet?  With a male officer and two enlisted gals? 
In this scenario, the fraternization, not the publicity of the video would be the punishable offense.
  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Lord Ratner said:
10 hours ago, HuggyU2 said:
Like a private, homemade porn video, that somehow ends up on the internet?  With a male officer and two enlisted gals? 

In this scenario, the fraternization, not the publicity of the video would be the punishable offense.

It's the Guard.  From what I've seen, nothing in the Guard is considered "fraternization".  

 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, HuggyU2 said:

It's the Guard.  From what I've seen, nothing in the Guard is considered "fraternization".  

 

Depends on what the boss things.  The Washington ANG (-135) Wing King was forced to retire last year, losing his promotion to Brig Gen, for having an affair with the OG Superintendent.

Posted

Like Jesus said, “Let he who has not engaged in a hot ménage with 2 enlisted babes cast the first stone.”

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 4
Posted
6 hours ago, Danger41 said:

Like Jesus said, “Let he who has not engaged in a hot ménage with 2 enlisted babes cast the first stone.”

*picks up his active duty stone*

  • Upvote 1
Posted
3 hours ago, FourFans130 said:

*picks up his active duty stone*

That story was right before the parable of the “inop sarcasm detector”. Believe it is located in the gospel of John (Boyd) 6:9. 

  • Haha 2
Posted
47 minutes ago, BashiChuni said:

Norty didn’t impress me 

didnt blues Monday start under his watch?

Blues Monday, the RIFs, reapings, practice bleeding, etc.....basically all the things we are gripping about today and reasons the good dudes are leaving were all exacerbated under his watch.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...