Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Whatever happened to the ideal giving pilots the choice of staying in the cockpit or going command track?

Posted
3 hours ago, flyusaf83 said:

Raise your hand if many of the days you drive into work, you dread the fact that your day will be littered with stupid unimportant bullshit that has no tangible meaning.

“2”

Posted
10 hours ago, flyusaf83 said:

Raise your hand if many of the days you drive into work, you dread the fact that your day will be littered with stupid unimportant bullshit that has no tangible meaning.

Wait you have had days that this wasn't true???!!

  • Like 1
Posted

Hits keep coming.

Got a call from outgoing Sq/CC today notifying me I'm going to get moved to a "great opportunity" to work on a "new mission system," and that the dude they told me for 3 months is just the Interim Dir of Ops is going to stay in place and be the actual DO.  He's "got the skill set they need."

I had initially asked 3 months ago if this was the case because I had a blue falcon feeling.  Sq/CC told me then it was not, that I was the DO "until I heard from him otherwise." So I guess he's not a liar.

Asked if I had any concerns. I told him I'd vectored my Command DT input as me already being in a DO position since that's what the 1-star who got me the job advised me to put.  Along with my OPR saying DO selection "spot on" (or whatever) and now if I'm not going to be a DO how's that going to impact my career?  Since I'll now not get the DO stamp on time, when I was identified as a early year-group candidate...what's the impact?

He was quiet and said he'd have to talk to everyone who made the decision about it.  Since they didn't think about that before.

I hit 20 yrs in Feb 19, ADSC up Nov 19.

Posted
1 hour ago, 17D_guy said:

Hits keep coming.

Got a call from outgoing Sq/CC today notifying me I'm going to get moved to a "great opportunity" to work on a "new mission system," and that the dude they told me for 3 months is just the Interim Dir of Ops is going to stay in place and be the actual DO.  He's "got the skill set they need."

I had initially asked 3 months ago if this was the case because I had a blue falcon feeling.  Sq/CC told me then it was not, that I was the DO "until I heard from him otherwise." So I guess he's not a liar.

Asked if I had any concerns. I told him I'd vectored my Command DT input as me already being in a DO position since that's what the 1-star who got me the job advised me to put.  Along with my OPR saying DO selection "spot on" (or whatever) and now if I'm not going to be a DO how's that going to impact my career?  Since I'll now not get the DO stamp on time, when I was identified as a early year-group candidate...what's the impact?

He was quiet and said he'd have to talk to everyone who made the decision about it.  Since they didn't think about that before.

I hit 20 yrs in Feb 19, ADSC up Nov 19.

Didn’t you hear that the AF has improved the assignment system and that it is looking out for you so that you can have a meaningful life?

  • Upvote 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Fuzz said:

Just remember we could still be part of the Army.

B2523002-4E5A-4009-A1B8-00E2481135E1.jpeg

Good god I hope they didn't make all the people who just returned participate in that run. 

 

Posted
On 7/7/2018 at 11:09 PM, YoungnDumb said:

AF answer- let's spend as much money as we can on a pointless cup that probably won't work but will involve 69 congressional districts

Common sense answer- tell your people to put their drinks in a bottle with a cap.

Government approved solution$.

Posted
7 hours ago, Fuzz said:

Just remember we could still be part of the Army.

B2523002-4E5A-4009-A1B8-00E2481135E1.jpeg

As someone currently assigned to an Army unit - I'm not surprised at all.  How anyone does 20 in that branch is beyond me.

Posted
How anyone goes past their initial commitment in that branch is beyond me.

I’ve met some Army O-6s who probably couldn’t keep a job managing a Taco Bell, so the pay/job security probably keeps some in.
Posted
6 minutes ago, ihtfp06 said:


I’ve met some Army O-6s who probably couldn’t keep a job managing a Taco Bell, so the pay/job security probably keeps some in.

Same applies to the USAF.

Posted
Same applies to the USAF.

Nah. An Air Force Colonel with an honorable service characterization could clearly manage an Apple store.
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, ihtfp06 said:


I’ve met some Army O-6s who probably couldn’t keep a job managing a Taco Bell, so the pay/job security probably keeps some in.

You didn't have to drop the 🎤 so hard. Daaaaaaamn!

Screenshot_20180709-181058.png

Edited by HarleyQuinn
Posted
17 hours ago, ihtfp06 said:


Nah. An Air Force Colonel with an honorable service characterization could clearly manage an Apple store.

I think a better example would be a USAF O-6 would be an excellent manager of a Radio Shack...

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Was just chatting with a coworker today about Air Force issues.  For the past decade plus, the military had been in a situation where they felt they had too many folks.  The common response to complaints was, "Well, if you don't like it, then get out!"  Now, the military has too few folks, and they're starting to realize that they need to start fixing the things that folks complain about in order to keep people in service.  The Air Force in particular has had an extremely difficult time transitioning from the "then get out!" mentality.  Rather than realize that folks are in fact voting with their feet, the Air Force just tries to throw more money at them rather than deal with the real issues and complaints that folks have. 

  • Like 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, The_Vandall said:

Rather than realize that folks are in fact voting with their feet, the Air Force just tries to throw more money at them rather than deal with the real issues and complaints that folks have. 

But the AF isn’t throwing money at anyone...

Posted
34 minutes ago, ThreeHoler said:

They’re not even really trying to throw more money. $35k/yr barely brings the bonus in line with inflation.

Agreed.  $35K is not enough.  I believe they tried to raise it higher ($42K or $45K I think), but it still wouldn't be enough.  The insidious part of the bonus though is the ADSC that comes with it.  For whatever reason, the Air Force seems to feel like it is perfectly fine to F over folks that are stuck with an ADSC. 

Posted
5 hours ago, ThreeHoler said:

They asked for $60k a year and were denied. John McCain thinks we get paid enough.

He is the reason why the costs we pay out of pocket to cover rental housing expenses are increasing to what, 5% next year.

Posted
5 hours ago, ThreeHoler said:

They asked for $60k a year and were denied. John McCain thinks we get paid enough.

Back in McCain's day, you could just draft people to fill the gaps.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...