Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, FLEA said:

Having just separated and attended like 30 networking events ill say this..... if it bothers you.... don't get out. Because its like 100X worse in the civilian world. Seriously just sat in a meeting with CHRO's from dozens of large companies and DE&I is the new hot sauce. 

That said, in your benefit, veterans and their families (specifically children and spouses) are now coming under the umbrella of DE&I as an oppressed class. 

In the civilian world I am free to not participate in deluded sexual fantasies of the insane.  And men pretending to be women are insane.  Women who cut off their tits and main line testosterone to live out severe mental health problems should be pitied not celebrated.  
 

The military is fundamentally different in that I took an oath to follow orders and we are not free to walk away.  Ordering the military to follow radical social philosophies wrecks unit cohesion and degrades lethality.  The DEI argument that inclusion increases unity because everyone feels valued might be true if they focused on tolerance. However, they are totalitarian not tolerant.  By forcing the language of their own worldview they deny equal dignity to my own which is antithetical to unit cohesion.

  

 

Edited by tac airlifter
  • Like 6
Posted

30 more days until I hit 30yrs/Retired Reserve/Grey Zone…so at least that is some relief.
I’m walking back into my civi-Govt job next week following terminal leave and I think where I am…the rudder hasn’t fully swung over like a purely civilian company….but I see it coming.  DEI is noise taking away from the end state/mission/goal IMO. I try to look past all of that and frame things as progress toward the end state. If you are a guy, dressed as a lady, in my briefing yet you are one of the few in the room that knows what they are doing and are producing….good category (actual situation).  If you are a piece of FOD, I will explain why in the context of progress toward the product end state and steer to correct or work with the higher ups to have them do their job (eye roll sometimes) and council/remove under-performers.   I try to set this context-based environment to limit turning room to exploit my comments in a different (read DEI) direction.  Won’t turn this into a “life as a GS employee” thread input…but anyone that works in that world knows we have our unique quirks and goods/bads/challenges vice a purely “for profit” company. 

I try and leave personal opinion at the SCIF door….some days I leak a little around the edges. 
 

ATIS

Posted
3 hours ago, HuggyU2 said:

I don't even know what cisgender means?  This is ridiculous.  Who makes up all of those categories?   I suffer from a condition that makes me like bigs tits.  I shall call this disease "big-tittiesgood".   Is that OK?  

Posted
I don't even know what cisgender means?  This is ridiculous.  Who makes up all of those categories?   I suffer from a condition that makes me like bigs tits.  I shall call this disease "big-tittiesgood".   Is that OK?  


If you’re a man, with a penis, and you like women with those assets…then you’re a cisgender man.
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, dream big said:

So… normal dude? 

Correct. You are now discriminated against based on your gender.  If you are white, you are now discriminated against based on your skin color.  Obviously, the only way to get rid of racism and bigotry is more racism and bigotry. 

In other news, I highly recommend "Undaunted Life" a podcast for men, about men, by a man who is unapologetically a Christian man.  No stones are left unturned.  Not for the faint of heart.

Edited by FourFans130
  • Thanks 2
Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, HuggyU2 said:

"If you are a cisgender woman, a transgender woman, non-binary, agender, bigender, two-spirit, demigender, genderfluid, genderqueer, or another form of gender minority, this program is for you,"

"Genderfluid" sounds like something that people on a porn set have to wipe up with a rag.  

I can't imagine telling someone that I'm "two-spirit" without offending native Americans.  

How did this ridiculousness become mainstream?   I truly don't understand the need to push this agenda.  It is like watching our country turn into a 90s Jerry Springer show.  

To the Generals who think that this environment will make a better warfighter, you have lost focus.  Xi thanks you for ruinining our military with this garbage!  

 

 

Edited by Biff_T
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, HeloDude said:

How long before they get rid of the term/rank “Airman”?

Around 2016 the Navy tried getting rid of all job titles with ‘man’ in them, bucking 200+ years of tradition. It was quickly rescinded as the outrage from the enlisted was enormous. 
 

 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, HuggyU2 said:

Gina Ortiz, Chief Bass, CQ Brown… OF COURSE they support this woke crap. The lower echelons also didn’t get to where they were by being yes men/women/whatever gender pronoun they have in their signature block. Does it get better…or is it here to stay, something to adapt to and work with? 
 

Posted

I don’t know, some of y’all’s ability to get triggered by a random CBT slide is impressive. I can personally attest to a career’s-worth of completing CBTs and having no idea what was in them, but maybe I’m the weird one. Still I’d wager that 99% of cadets would’ve already forgotten about it too other than now their great uncle who fought in ‘Nam is emailing them demanding to know why the hell they’ve gone woke.
I get that Tucker keeps bringing this stuff up to get us all in a froth but oof, it’s gotta just be exhausting repeatedly taking that bait.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
  • Downvote 7
Posted
28 minutes ago, Bigred said:

Around 2016 the Navy tried getting rid of all job titles with ‘man’ in them, bucking 200+ years of tradition. It was quickly rescinded as the outrage from the enlisted was enormous. 
 

 

Big difference from even 2016 to 2022.

If you can’t say “guys” when referencing a group of people, then how can you call someone an “Airman” who isn’t a man?  Or who at least doesn’t “identify with being a man”? 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

I don’t know, some of y’all’s ability to get triggered by a random CBT slide is impressive. I can personally attest to a career’s-worth of completing CBTs and having no idea what was in them, but maybe I’m the weird one. Still I’d wager that 99% of cadets would’ve already forgotten about it too other than now their great uncle who fought in ‘Nam is emailing them demanding to know why the hell they’ve gone woke.
I get that Tucker keeps bringing this stuff up to get us all in a froth but oof, it’s gotta just be exhausting repeatedly taking that bait.

Have fun calling people "Genderfluid".   Tell me again how this kills more bad guys?

  • Upvote 3
Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

I don’t know, some of y’all’s ability to get triggered by a random CBT slide is impressive. I can personally attest to a career’s-worth of completing CBTs and having no idea what was in them, but maybe I’m the weird one. Still I’d wager that 99% of cadets would’ve already forgotten about it too other than now their great uncle who fought in ‘Nam is emailing them demanding to know why the hell they’ve gone woke.
I get that Tucker keeps bringing this stuff up to get us all in a froth but oof, it’s gotta just be exhausting repeatedly taking that bait.

Your head is buried up you know where if you think this is just talked about in a CBT. A former Squadron Commander forced their Flight CCs to take part in a book club on “White Fragility”, open your eyes dude. 
 

Damn autocorrect 

Edited by dream big
  • Upvote 2
Posted

Hugo, even if Tucker brings it up... it's either true or it's not.  

If it's true... and even if the cadets ignore it... it is a very concerning shift of the AF Culture for many people.  

  • Upvote 6
Posted
1 hour ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

I don’t know, some of y’all’s ability to get triggered by a random CBT slide is impressive. I can personally attest to a career’s-worth of completing CBTs and having no idea what was in them, but maybe I’m the weird one. Still I’d wager that 99% of cadets would’ve already forgotten about it too other than now their great uncle who fought in ‘Nam is emailing them demanding to know why the hell they’ve gone woke.
I get that Tucker keeps bringing this stuff up to get us all in a froth but oof, it’s gotta just be exhausting repeatedly taking that bait.

If the CBT is forgettable, let’s not do it.  If it’s genuine, our elected leaders have a duty to debate the content before new ideology is mandated upon the force.  Either way, how am I “taking the bait?”  Your commentary is logically incoherent.
 

And nice dig at a past generation of war fighters who answered the nations call.  Nothing makes your point more convincing than disparaging those who went before us🙄

  • Like 3
  • Upvote 3
Posted (edited)

Nah, you guys are just confusing my apathy for opposition. But I’m still reading your measured responses and promise as soon as my lightbulb goes on that this is a national emergency and not just some anecdote that’s getting blown out of proportion then I’ll be fangs out too.
In both the unit and the airline I’m yet to have a single person tell me their preferred pronoun, but daily I’m listening to someone’s rant about wokeness, so I guess my perspective of what we’re spending too much time talking about differs from y’all. 

5 hours ago, Biff_T said:

Have fun calling people "Genderfluid".   Tell me again how this kills more bad guys?

I don’t plan to, so I just…won’t. No objection to the “won’t kill more bad guys” sentiment though.

5 hours ago, dream big said:

A former Squadron Commander forced their Flight CCs to take part in a book club on “White Fragility”

I had a former squadron commander tell me it was more important to go to SOS than IPUG. CCs say dumb stuff all the time. And if that gets under the skin of a Flt/CC then maybe they’re being too, uh, fragile. 

4 hours ago, HuggyU2 said:

If it's true... and even if the cadets ignore it... it is a very concerning shift of the AF Culture for many people.

You’re right it is true, but lots of things are simultaneously true while also not being that big of a deal. Where did the leap occur that a single slide titled “What Can I Do?” is the same thing as a concerning AF culture shift? We’ve all complained for years that the suicide awareness training hasn’t done anything to stem suicides, and I’ll be the first to confess that if I ingested a biological agent my 80% SABC test score wouldn’t save my bacon….why are we running with pitchforks to the internet as if this is any different? 
 

3 hours ago, tac airlifter said:

If the CBT is forgettable, let’s not do it.  If it’s genuine, our elected leaders have a duty to debate the content before new ideology is mandated upon the force.

Amen to your first sentence. Second one is interesting. Could be wrong but I’m unaware of politicians having a direct hand in debating and deciding on our courseware slides. You’re in favor of that though? I see unintended consequences of setting that precedent.

3 hours ago, tac airlifter said:

And nice dig at a past generation of war fighters who answered the nations call.

I never intended a dig and upon further reflection still don’t see where the disparagement of those who answered the call occurred, but I’ll apologize for however you took it. Would you feel less sensitive if I changed it to “great aunt who retired from Wells Fargo?” Kind of have to tip my hat to the irony of you reading into my words and getting offended by something I neither outright said nor intended though. Maybe someone should put together some training so I can recognize inadvertent microaggressions and avoid triggering any groups? Oof!

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
  • Haha 2
  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 2
Posted

Ignore and downplay this garbage at your own peril. This is not some annoying side show of worthless CBTs. 
 

Ever since 2020 and George Floyd the extreme far left is not afraid to show that a pillar of their political agenda is racial and identity politics. These people are now in positions of power all over the govt and the DoD. They are not doing this out of some goodwill gesture to have a more accepting military force. These folks hate the military; the entire mil structure is a giant sucking chest wound of money that they believe would be better served being poured into social programs. What better way to weaken an entity you hate than degrade it by instilling and indoctrinating as many people to your agenda as possible while simultaneously turning off the main base of talent that the military used to recruit from. 
 

A chief of diversity for the Pentagon has legitimately and openly racist tweets from not that long ago towards white people. This is not some FoxNews fantasy, it’s really happening.

  • Like 7

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...