PlanePhlyer Posted August 2, 2015 Posted August 2, 2015 I put in for this a few months ago. My band starts next April. When should I expect the thanks/no thanks email? I've been checking my email everyday. Don't want to hound ACC dude, but I'm really wondering. Tks.
WTFAF Posted October 13, 2016 Posted October 13, 2016 Anybody here have a contact they can PM me for a BACN volunteer?
Ram Posted October 13, 2016 Posted October 13, 2016 Mmmmmmm......BACN.Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums
magnetfreezer Posted November 21, 2017 Posted November 21, 2017 Got a rumor of 12X tasking to this deployment as well - any truth to this, flying/nonflying, etc? Can PM if necessary
jrobe Posted November 21, 2018 Posted November 21, 2018 8 hours ago, AK60 said: Are they still looking for/taking Guard help? As of a few months ago no. but you never know if you don’t ask
Danger41 Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 https://www.airforcemag.com/app/uploads/2021/01/27-Jan-2020-ACC-Bagram-Airfield-E-11-AIB-Narrative.pdf AIB released on E-11 crash in Afghanistan. TLDR version: Engine failure followed by shutdown of good engine with no air start. 1
Bergman Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 34 minutes ago, Danger41 said: https://www.airforcemag.com/app/uploads/2021/01/27-Jan-2020-ACC-Bagram-Airfield-E-11-AIB-Narrative.pdf AIB released on E-11 crash in Afghanistan. TLDR version: Engine failure followed by shutdown of good engine with no air start. So damned sad. Almost unimaginable how two guys with that much quality experience ended up going down that path. Could be any one of us on any given day. Heads on a swivel, fellas. 🍻 to the crew. RIP. 2
precontact Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 (edited) That's why in the airline world shutting engines down is not a Boldface/Memory item procedure anymore. Edited January 25, 2021 by precontact 1
HuggyU2 Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 (edited) Is it boldface in the E-11? In my brief scan of the document, the wording implies it isn't boldface. Edited January 25, 2021 by HuggyU2
BashiChuni Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 Just now, BashiChuni said: "Squadron pilots agreed that there was a strong preference for returning to KAF with most emergencies or other issues. While Bagram was a divert possibility, diverting was usually anticipated because of weather or other issues (combat related) denying the use of KAF, rather than driven by emergencies. Discussion of emergency airfields was rare." tough report to read. there but the grace of God go i... 1
ARAMP1 Posted January 25, 2021 Posted January 25, 2021 31 minutes ago, HuggyU2 said: Is it boldface in the E-11? In my brief scan of the document, the wording implies it isn't boldface. If the engine quit without a fire CAS message, no. Engine Fire and Dual Engine Out is.
precontact Posted January 26, 2021 Posted January 26, 2021 22 hours ago, HuggyU2 said: Is it boldface in the E-11? In my brief scan of the document, the wording implies it isn't boldface. Honestly I don't know, was just trying to say that the philosophy of years ago with engine failures has changed.
8BC Posted January 26, 2021 Posted January 26, 2021 The “RED” checklists used to be considered memory item/bold face, of which, there are 27 of them in the BBD-700. Some are short, single-step checklists, the longest has 12 steps. Bombardier changed their philosophy in late 2017 when they significantly revised their QRH (Checklist) format. The 27 procedures are now also printed on a single piece of paper, similar to a fan-fold checklist. They are no longer considered Memory Item procedures and the fan-fold is expected to be referenced. This has resulted in significant debate as to which is the best method; memory item vs. referenced checklist. Most simulator training examiners still expect a memory item/boldface level of knowledge in the pre-brief/oral examination, but then expect the checklist to be referenced in the simulator to prevent procedural errors. 430 EECS pilots are required to complete a monthly “Boldface” sheet. In this, the “Challenge” is already printed on the paper, the pilot has to fill in the “Response” side of the boldface. This is the way the squadron did it 4+ years ago, this is the way it is still done today. 1
Clark Griswold Posted February 7, 2021 Posted February 7, 2021 More BACN https://alert5.com/2021/02/07/usaf-getting-first-of-six-new-e-11as-this-june/
Newb Posted December 16, 2021 Posted December 16, 2021 (edited) Couldn’t find this information using the search function. Could somebody please share: 1. How many hours could someone expect on a deployment? 2. Is the deployment 6 months long? 3. How much time will be spent TDY? 4. Do you get an ATP after training? 5. Do you graduate initial training as an AC? In other words, is it all PIC? Edited December 17, 2021 by Newb
QAZqaz Posted December 21, 2021 Posted December 21, 2021 On 12/17/2021 at 2:44 AM, Newb said: Couldn’t find this information using the search function. Could somebody please share: 1. How many hours could someone expect on a deployment? 2. Is the deployment 6 months long? 3. How much time will be spent TDY? 4. Do you get an ATP after training? 5. Do you graduate initial training as an AC? In other words, is it all PIC? I know some guys who have done this assignment and I was looking into it at one point. From what I hear you do receive an ATP (and a very expensive type rating). I believe the TDY was 2 months or so to learn the aircraft. Yes 6 months though I knew a guy that voluntarily extended for an additional 6 months (and when he got back got non Vol’d to UPT, thanks AMC…). Current location Dahfra. Unsure if it’s all PIC or not but you upgrade to IP out there in fairly short order… either way you split primary and secondary and “pic” time isn’t logged anyway. seems like a real cool assignment. Though with AFG shut down not sure on the hrs anymore. I’m sure you can look up the unit in the GAL and email an ADO or something. Good luck!
jice Posted May 31, 2022 Posted May 31, 2022 Anybody in the know Re: this airframe becoming a program of record and standing up a stateside squadron? I see airframe purchases, budget money for modification/procurement and articles about a plan to put them at Robins as a GSU under the 319th RW. When are we going to pull the trigger? Think we will? DMs welcome (to exchange .mil as required). Are the EQ-4s done flying yet?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now