Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Interesting article, except for this paragraph... This is just irritating to me for some reason.

Standard liberal logic. Killing a baby and a terrorist are the same thing. Except killing babies is okay and "murdering" terrorists is not. Also, she called the A-10 a bomber.

  • Upvote 3
Posted

She's on Greta Van Susteren's "On The Record" right now... same old shit...

Standard--shitty politicians on both sides (as well as shitty-wannabe politicians).

Posted
She almost has me convinced that she believes the crap that comes out of her mouth (STS).

No STS needed, it is actually crap that comes out of her mouth.

Posted

Heard her local Tucson radio ad a few times the other day. "I'm Martha McSally and Ive been in the Air Force for 26 years as a Fighter Pilot, and retired as a Colonel..." bla bla bla

The inflections in her voice during those words were totally obvious

Posted

From https://ballotpedia.o...laws_in_Arizona

Arizona recount procedures

An automatic recount is required when the margin between the two candidates with the greatest number of votes for a particular office is either less than 0.1% of votes cast or does not exceed 200 votes for statewide offices or 50 votes for offices in the state legislature. [1] When the canvass shows a recount is required for a statewide office or a congressional race, the Secretary of State certifies the facts requiring the recount to thesuperior court in Maricopa County. [2] The court enters an order requiring a recount in accord with state requirements regarding election vote counting. [3] Where the vote was conducted on electronic voting equipment, the recount is conducted on an automatic tabulating system furnished and programmed by the Secretary of State. § 16-664. The results are presented to the court and the court announces the results and enters an order describing its determination. [4] The state or county pays the costs of the recount.[5]

Recount requests are not permitted. Barrera v. Superior Court, 117 Ariz. 528, 573 P.2d 928 (App. Div.2 1977).

So given the numbers at the moment: yes.

Posted

An automatic recount is required when the margin between the two candidates with the greatest number of votes for a particular office is either less than 0.1% of votes cast or does not exceed 200 votes for statewide offices

So given the numbers at the moment: yes.

Um.... 105485 - 105099 = 386; 386 > 200

105485 + 105099 = 210584; 210584 x .1% = 211; 386 > 211

Unless there are an update to the numbers, the info you posted seems to say there is NOT cause for a recount....

Posted

Um.... 105485 - 105099 = 386; 386 > 200

105485 + 105099 = 210584; 210584 x .1% = 211; 386 > 211

Unless there are an update to the numbers, the info you posted seems to say there is NOT cause for a recount....

You are correct. The 386 difference is .182433454%. No recount required. Although feel free to check my math again.

Posted

Ballots still being counted...

McSally 'optimistic' in race with Barber as vote count continues

***WARNING*** That link contains pics of the candidates! You've been warned!

Unofficial results from the Arizona Secretary of State’s Office showed McSally on Wednesday maintaining a lead of 1,312 votes, or less than 1 percent, over Barber in District 2, which includes Tucson and all of Cochise County.

Harvie argued that provisional ballots cast on Election Day and ballots in Republican-leaning Cochise County would put McSally over the top. McSally clearly won Election Day votes, while Barber led strongly in early ballots.

But Pima County had more than 80,000 ballots left to tally countywide, with about half being early ballots and half provisional ballots that would need to be verified by election officials. It was not immediately clear how many ballots remained uncounted in Cochise County.

Posted

Just the thought of 'Congresswoman McSally' scares me...

You're better off doing an image google search on 'McFlapps'

Posted

you would think the early votes would have been counted well before now.

Posted

you would think the early votes would have been counted well before now.

Nope! Early votes are only counted when the race is close. They are collected and stored, not counted as they come in.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...