Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks. I'll browse through all 142 pages to see if it clearly answers my question.

I was hoping you could make a PowerPoint...

Short answer, Part I is factual information and is releasable. It includes things like photos without analysis and names of people who were interviewed. It must not include analysis, privileged testimony, or findings. It is normally only released to the AIB.

Example: photo of cockpit panel with gear handle up is factual and releasable. Same photo with person's finger pointing to the gear handle is privileged and is not releasable.

If someone releases privileged information, they are subject to disciplinary action.

You can now log off your annual privilege brief...

Posted

Example: photo of cockpit panel with gear handle up is factual and releasable. Same photo with person's finger pointing to the gear handle is privileged and is not releasable.

So did anyone get disciplined for releasing that photo?

Posted

too soon

but :beer:

uh...yeah. Way too soon...

...however, I did have a beer at noon today

I was hoping you could make a PowerPoint...

<Good answer>

You can now log off your annual privilege brief...

Reference above.

Posted

So did anyone get disciplined for releasing that photo?

What photo? The one from the C-17 did not have a finger in it. Therefore, releasable, no disipline.

Posted

What photo? The one from the C-17 did not have a finger in it. Therefore, releasable, no disipline.

I wasn't referring to any specific incident. I could have said:

Photo of penny wedged in circuit breaker panel...releasable. Photo of finger pointing to penny wedged into circuit breaker panel...not releasable.

Just trying to make the difference between the SIB's Part I and Part II understandable.

Posted

I wasn't referring to any specific incident. I could have said:

Photo of penny wedged in circuit breaker panel...releasable. Photo of finger pointing to penny wedged into circuit breaker panel...not releasable.

Just trying to make the difference between the SIB's Part I and Part II understandable.

???? I wasnt talking about you. Did you see who's post I quoted?

snapback.pngSteve Davies, on 16 June 2012 - 07:15 AM, said:

So did anyone get disciplined for releasing that photo?

To which I responded: "What photo?"

Posted

Butters, decaf.

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Any idea why it's taking so long? Seems disproportionately lengthy on this one.

The SIB had very little to go off of, and had a lot of theory, conjecture and "best guess" which may be holding up the AIB.

Posted

The SIB had very little to go off of, and had a lot of theory, conjecture and &quot;best guess&quot; which may be holding up the AIB.

Ditch your opinion on this forum about this subject.

  • Upvote 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...