Fuzz Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 A subcommittee established by the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act released findings criticizing Senator Kirsten Gillibrand's (D-NY) push to "remove commanders' authority in military sexual assault crimes." https://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/01/31/Subcommittee-Rejects-Sen-Gillibrand-s-Military-Sexual-Assault-Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperWSO Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 (edited) Looks like she managed to get an incentive ride. That was already stated by Hispeed. Wow Four. Edited February 4, 2014 by SuperWSO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
busdriver Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Commanders "are neither essential nor well-suited for their current role in the legal process of criminal prosecution." We have clearly done a piss poor job of conveying to civilians that a commander is more than just a boss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeloDude Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 https://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/01/31/Subcommittee-Rejects-Sen-Gillibrand-s-Military-Sexual-Assault-Bill I don't think it really matters that much...the damage has already been done. I don't see too many GO's doing what Gen Franklin did from now on...it's falling on your sword for sure. Which is maybe what the politicians and Pentagon civilians were wanting all along--to send a strong message. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddy Spike Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 She's actually a program manager for some shoe clerk. And she got ridden more than most porn stars during her time at the zoo Ok, so where are the nudes then? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeloDude Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Ok, so where are the nudes then? Well, if you're hoping to find them just by Google alone, don't waste your time...already checked. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hispeed7721 Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Ok, so where are the nudes then? I wasn't one of the MANY dudes she shacked up with, but then again I also don't carry a bottle of penicillin around with me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcj Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 (edited) Not a sexual assault accusation, but this won't be helpful. Note the special forces tab on his official photo. https://www.armytimes.com/article/20140203/CAREERS03/302030016/Fort-Carson-hospital-chief-accused-misconduct https://gazette.com/records-show-former-fort-carson-commander-made-inappropriate-comments-sexual-innuendos/article/1513760 Edited February 4, 2014 by jcj Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BitteEinBit Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Not judging either way on these accusations. If they are true, even I think some of the comments cross the line, but seriously...is everyone that f*cking offended at work these days!?! We can't even scratch our nuts anymore without being accused of something vulgar. BTW...I don't believe the story about the hot nurse...I want to see pictures to verify, or it just simply didn't happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slander Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 [rant] I wasn't one of the MANY dudes she shacked up with, but then again I also don't carry a bottle of penicillin around with me Dude. Stop. If this were a dude we'd all be high-fiving him for all his conquests and bragging about what a bad ass our bro is who "bagged all those hot broads." She was in a target-rich environment (for girls) and she went winchester. Can't blame her for that. I've never met her, don't know anything about her other than what I see on this message board. I'm sure all those other cadets who got back seat rides at Luke "earned it" too, regardless of their gender. I like saying so-to-speak and weaving "69" as often as I can into conversation (because I'm an immature child right, Liquid?) but I can't get behind blatant sexism like this. Got it, Al-Gore's-internets message board, not at work, I know. But this is the shit that seeps into conversations at work and pisses off the 1COs enough to talk to Huffpo and "blow things out of proportion." To me, it's akin to seeking out the only black dude in your squadron and asking him the best recipe for fried chicken or kool aid or who the newest rap star will be, and that is certainly unacceptable. We should be better than this and I hope we are. BL: She's hot, knows it, and uses it to her advantage. Don't pretend you wouldn't do the exact same thing if you could. I definitely would. If you want a taste of what that's like, take yourself (and your green-card giving abilities) to somewhere East of the Berlin wall (Budapest, Bucharest, Constanza, Prague, Split, etc). American accent + a little walkin' around money = every smokeshow loves you. Ops tested. [/rant] 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sqwatch Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 I don't think it really matters that much...the damage has already been done. I don't see too many GO's doing what Gen Franklin did from now on...it's falling on your sword for sure. Which is maybe what the politicians and Pentagon civilians were wanting all along--to send a strong message. Assuming GOs are politically astute, he knew this would end his career yet made the call. Hence the unnecessary public explanation for his decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeloDude Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Don't pretend you wouldn't do the exact same thing if you could. Who says that I don't? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddy Spike Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 [rant] Dude. Stop. If this were a dude we'd all be high-fiving him for all his conquests and bragging about what a bad ass our bro is who "bagged all those hot broads." She was in a target-rich environment (for girls) and she went winchester. Can't blame her for that. I've never met her, don't know anything about her other than what I see on this message board. I'm sure all those other cadets who got back seat rides at Luke "earned it" too, regardless of their gender. I like saying so-to-speak and weaving "69" as often as I can into conversation (because I'm an immature child right, Liquid?) but I can't get behind blatant sexism like this. Got it, Al-Gore's-internets message board, not at work, I know. But this is the shit that seeps into conversations at work and pisses off the 1COs enough to talk to Huffpo and "blow things out of proportion." To me, it's akin to seeking out the only black dude in your squadron and asking him the best recipe for fried chicken or kool aid or who the newest rap star will be, and that is certainly unacceptable. We should be better than this and I hope we are. BL: She's hot, knows it, and uses it to her advantage. Don't pretend you wouldn't do the exact same thing if you could. I definitely would. If you want a taste of what that's like, take yourself (and your green-card giving abilities) to somewhere East of the Berlin wall (Budapest, Bucharest, Constanza, Prague, Split, etc). American accent + a little walkin' around money = every smokeshow loves you. Ops tested. [/rant] 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThreeHoler Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 BL: She's hot, knows it, and uses it to her advantage. Except that she's not hot, at least what I can see from the over-applied makeup and possible use of Photoshop on the pictures in this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoo Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 Except that she's not hot, at least what I can see from the over-applied makeup and possible use of Photoshop on the pictures in this thread. Thank you. Don't forget the underbite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hispeed7721 Posted February 4, 2014 Share Posted February 4, 2014 (edited) Rant I don't think it went quite that far, but I can certainly see where you're coming from. I've said my bit about it so no need for anything further. Sorry if anyone was offended or thought it was taken too far. Edited February 4, 2014 by hispeed7721 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drewpey Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 Military Brass Behaving Badly Martin P. Schweitzer, a commander with the Army’s legendary 82nd Airborne Division, was respectful and polite when he met a female member of Congress to discuss matters at Fort Bragg, N.C. Afterward, however, he couldn’t resist tapping out e-mails to two other generals, describing the lawmaker, Rep. Renee L. Ellmers (R-N.C.), as “smoking hot” and jokingly referring to explicit sexual acts. LOL I too question this general's judgement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzz Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 I too question this general's judgement. Its the army, there's not exactly a lot to work with there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeloDude Posted February 5, 2014 Share Posted February 5, 2014 I too question this general's judgement. She's pro-gun, so that automatically makes her better looking compared to if she was for gun control. M2 said he agrees. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WABoom Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 LOL I too question this general's judgement. What is she staring at? The camera or something slightly off to the left of it??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 (edited) LOL I too question this general's judgement. LOL. New guy. The Army guys call that "recalibration". That right there is a: Home station 3 Home station 5 (MILF scale) Mid 1990's: Al Jaber 9 Early 2000's: Kandahar 8/Bagram 7 Mid 2000's: Deployed 1 (0/1 scale) Late 2000's: Deployed 1 (0/1/2 scale) 2010's: 1000-1030 on the skank clock I watched one of my guys hit on an army nurse downrange in 03 that looked like Walter Matthau, and I was like "nice". Edited February 6, 2014 by Bob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drewpey Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 What is she staring at? The camera or something slightly off to the left of it??? both? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TreeA10 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 Never heard of the skank clock rating. How does that work? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HU&W Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 Looks like there may be an opening for a Reservist Major at MacDill... In all seriousness though, this is exactly the kind of press the AF doesn't need right now. link Air Force Reserve transportation officer David Mario Riley answered an online Craigslist ad from a man who was looking for someone with a sexual interest in children. Riley wrote an email in December: "Hi, I saw your ad … while looking for other pervs in the area … I will be visiting DC from jan 27-feb 7, but will be alone … and would like to get together with other pervs and explore taboo." That contact is described in federal court records charging Riley, 37, of Tampa, former commander of the 927th Logistics Readiness Squadron at MacDill, with distributing child pornography. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 https://www.efoia.af.mil/palMain.aspx Wooton Report of Investigation (S7050P)ALLEGATION, that Brig Gen Kevin B. Wooton engaged in an inappropriate relationship with a contract employee, in violation of Article 133 of the Uniform Code of Mllitary Justice, Conduct Unbecoming an Officer and Gentleman, was SUBSTANTIATED. | The preponderance of evidence supported the conclusion that Brig Gen Wooton engaged in an inappropriate intimate and/or sexual relationship with Ms. [REDACTED]. This behavior disgraced him personally and seriously compromised his standing as an officer, given his position, marital status, rank, and stature.https://www.af.mil/AboutUs/Biographies/Display/tabid/225/Article/108821/brigadier-general-kevin-b-wooton.aspx Uhrich Report of Investigation (S7077P)ALLEGATION 1, that Brig Gen David C. Uhrich, from on or about 28Jan13 to on or about 15 Feb 13, engaged in an inappropriate relationship with Ms. [REDACTED], an Air Force non-appropriated fund employee, in violation of Article 133 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Conduct Unbecoming an Officer and Gentleman, was SUBSTANTIATED. | The preponderance of evidence supported the conclusion that Brig Gen Uhrich engaged in a romantic relationship with Ms. [REDACTED] while he was married, which in his unofficial capacily dishonored him personally, and hence was unbecoming as an officer and gentlemen. ALLEGATION 2, that between July 2011 and May2012, Brig Gen David C. Uhrich consumed alcohol in a manner that was of a nature to bring discredit upon the Armed Forces, in violation of Article 134, General Article, of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, was SUBSTANTIATED. | The preponderance of evidence supported the conclusion that Brig Gen Uhrich's actions relating to alcohol use, to include repeatedly drinking while on duty, was of a nature to, and actually did, bring discredit to himself, the Air Force general officer corps, and the armed forces.https://www.af.mil/AboutUs/Biographies/Display/tabid/225/Article/108667/brigadier-general-david-c-uhrich.aspx Givens Report of Investigation (S7030P)ALLEGATION 1 that Brig Gen Robert Givens, from on about Sep 2010 to on or about Aug 2012, engaged in an inappropriate relationship with Mrs. [REDACTED], the wife of a fellow Air Force officer, in violation of Article 133 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Conduct Unbecoming an Officer and Gentlamsa, was SUBSTANTIATED.https://www.af.mil/AboutUs/Biographies/Display/tabid/225/Article/108719/brigadier-general-robert-p-givens.aspx Long's Report of Investigation (S7079P)ALLEGATION 2. That beginning on or about April 2011, Colonel Scott C. Long engaged in an unprofessional relationship with Ms. [REDACTED] in violation of AFI 36-2909, Professional and Unprofessional Relationships, was SUBSTANTIATED.https://www.388fw.acc.af.mil/library/biographies/bio.asp?id=14408 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now