Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Looks like she managed to get an incentive ride.

That was already stated by Hispeed.

Wow

Four. Edited by SuperWSO
Posted

Commanders "are neither essential nor well-suited for their current role in the legal process of criminal prosecution." We have clearly done a piss poor job of conveying to civilians that a commander is more than just a boss.

Posted

Not judging either way on these accusations. If they are true, even I think some of the comments cross the line, but seriously...is everyone that f*cking offended at work these days!?! We can't even scratch our nuts anymore without being accused of something vulgar.

BTW...I don't believe the story about the hot nurse...I want to see pictures to verify, or it just simply didn't happen.

Posted

[rant]

I wasn't one of the MANY dudes she shacked up with, but then again I also don't carry a bottle of penicillin around with me

Dude. Stop. If this were a dude we'd all be high-fiving him for all his conquests and bragging about what a bad ass our bro is who "bagged all those hot broads." She was in a target-rich environment (for girls) and she went winchester. Can't blame her for that. I've never met her, don't know anything about her other than what I see on this message board. I'm sure all those other cadets who got back seat rides at Luke "earned it" too, regardless of their gender.

I like saying so-to-speak and weaving "69" as often as I can into conversation (because I'm an immature child right, Liquid?) but I can't get behind blatant sexism like this. Got it, Al-Gore's-internets message board, not at work, I know. But this is the shit that seeps into conversations at work and pisses off the 1COs enough to talk to Huffpo and "blow things out of proportion." To me, it's akin to seeking out the only black dude in your squadron and asking him the best recipe for fried chicken or kool aid or who the newest rap star will be, and that is certainly unacceptable.

We should be better than this and I hope we are.

BL: She's hot, knows it, and uses it to her advantage. Don't pretend you wouldn't do the exact same thing if you could. I definitely would. If you want a taste of what that's like, take yourself (and your green-card giving abilities) to somewhere East of the Berlin wall (Budapest, Bucharest, Constanza, Prague, Split, etc). American accent + a little walkin' around money = every smokeshow loves you. Ops tested.

[/rant]

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted

I don't think it really matters that much...the damage has already been done. I don't see too many GO's doing what Gen Franklin did from now on...it's falling on your sword for sure. Which is maybe what the politicians and Pentagon civilians were wanting all along--to send a strong message.

Assuming GOs are politically astute, he knew this would end his career yet made the call. Hence the unnecessary public explanation for his decision.
Posted

[rant]

Dude. Stop. If this were a dude we'd all be high-fiving him for all his conquests and bragging about what a bad ass our bro is who "bagged all those hot broads." She was in a target-rich environment (for girls) and she went winchester. Can't blame her for that. I've never met her, don't know anything about her other than what I see on this message board. I'm sure all those other cadets who got back seat rides at Luke "earned it" too, regardless of their gender.

I like saying so-to-speak and weaving "69" as often as I can into conversation (because I'm an immature child right, Liquid?) but I can't get behind blatant sexism like this. Got it, Al-Gore's-internets message board, not at work, I know. But this is the shit that seeps into conversations at work and pisses off the 1COs enough to talk to Huffpo and "blow things out of proportion." To me, it's akin to seeking out the only black dude in your squadron and asking him the best recipe for fried chicken or kool aid or who the newest rap star will be, and that is certainly unacceptable.

We should be better than this and I hope we are.

BL: She's hot, knows it, and uses it to her advantage. Don't pretend you wouldn't do the exact same thing if you could. I definitely would. If you want a taste of what that's like, take yourself (and your green-card giving abilities) to somewhere East of the Berlin wall (Budapest, Bucharest, Constanza, Prague, Split, etc). American accent + a little walkin' around money = every smokeshow loves you. Ops tested.

[/rant]

Internet_white_knight.gif

  • Upvote 5
Posted

BL: She's hot, knows it, and uses it to her advantage.

Except that she's not hot, at least what I can see from the over-applied makeup and possible use of Photoshop on the pictures in this thread.

Posted

Except that she's not hot, at least what I can see from the over-applied makeup and possible use of Photoshop on the pictures in this thread.

Thank you. Don't forget the underbite.

Posted (edited)

Rant

I don't think it went quite that far, but I can certainly see where you're coming from. I've said my bit about it so no need for anything further. Sorry if anyone was offended or thought it was taken too far.

Edited by hispeed7721
Posted

Martin P. Schweitzer, a commander with the Army’s legendary 82nd Airborne Division, was respectful and polite when he met a female member of Congress to discuss matters at Fort Bragg, N.C. Afterward, however, he couldn’t resist tapping out e-mails to two other generals, describing the lawmaker, Rep. Renee L. Ellmers (R-N.C.), as “smoking hot” and jokingly referring to explicit sexual acts.

398px-Rep._Renee_Ellmers.jpg

LOL

I too question this general's judgement.

Posted

I too question this general's judgement.

Its the army, there's not exactly a lot to work with there.

Posted

I too question this general's judgement.

She's pro-gun, so that automatically makes her better looking compared to if she was for gun control.

M2 said he agrees.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

398px-Rep._Renee_Ellmers.jpg

LOL

I too question this general's judgement.

What is she staring at? The camera or something slightly off to the left of it???

Posted (edited)

398px-Rep._Renee_Ellmers.jpg

LOL

I too question this general's judgement.

LOL. New guy.

The Army guys call that "recalibration".

That right there is a:

Home station 3

Home station 5 (MILF scale)

Mid 1990's: Al Jaber 9

Early 2000's: Kandahar 8/Bagram 7

Mid 2000's: Deployed 1 (0/1 scale)

Late 2000's: Deployed 1 (0/1/2 scale)

2010's: 1000-1030 on the skank clock

post-71572-0-39129000-1391683652_thumb.j

I watched one of my guys hit on an army nurse downrange in 03 that looked like Walter Matthau, and I was like "nice".

Edited by Bob
Posted

Looks like there may be an opening for a Reservist Major at MacDill... In all seriousness though, this is exactly the kind of press the AF doesn't need right now.

link

Air Force Reserve transportation officer David Mario Riley answered an online Craigslist ad from a man who was looking for someone with a sexual interest in children. Riley wrote an email in December: "Hi, I saw your ad … while looking for other pervs in the area … I will be visiting DC from jan 27-feb 7, but will be alone … and would like to get together with other pervs and explore taboo." That contact is described in federal court records charging Riley, 37, of Tampa, former commander of the 927th Logistics Readiness Squadron at MacDill, with distributing child pornography.

Posted

https://www.efoia.af.mil/palMain.aspx

Wooton Report of Investigation (S7050P)

ALLEGATION, that Brig Gen Kevin B. Wooton engaged in an inappropriate relationship with a contract employee, in violation of Article 133 of the Uniform Code of Mllitary Justice, Conduct Unbecoming an Officer and Gentleman, was SUBSTANTIATED. | The preponderance of evidence supported the conclusion that Brig Gen Wooton engaged in an inappropriate intimate and/or sexual relationship with Ms. [REDACTED]. This behavior disgraced him personally and seriously compromised his standing as an officer, given his position, marital status, rank, and stature.

https://www.af.mil/AboutUs/Biographies/Display/tabid/225/Article/108821/brigadier-general-kevin-b-wooton.aspx

Uhrich Report of Investigation (S7077P)

ALLEGATION 1, that Brig Gen David C. Uhrich, from on or about 28Jan13 to on or about 15 Feb 13, engaged in an inappropriate relationship with Ms. [REDACTED], an Air Force non-appropriated fund employee, in violation of Article 133 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Conduct Unbecoming an Officer and Gentleman, was SUBSTANTIATED. | The preponderance of evidence supported the conclusion that Brig Gen Uhrich engaged in a romantic relationship with Ms. [REDACTED] while he was married, which in his unofficial capacily dishonored him personally, and hence was unbecoming as an officer and gentlemen.

ALLEGATION 2, that between July 2011 and May2012, Brig Gen David C. Uhrich consumed alcohol in a manner that was of a nature to bring discredit upon the Armed Forces, in violation of Article 134, General Article, of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, was SUBSTANTIATED. | The preponderance of evidence supported the conclusion that Brig Gen Uhrich's actions relating to alcohol use, to include repeatedly drinking while on duty, was of a nature to, and actually did, bring discredit to himself, the Air Force general officer corps, and the armed forces.

https://www.af.mil/AboutUs/Biographies/Display/tabid/225/Article/108667/brigadier-general-david-c-uhrich.aspx

Givens Report of Investigation (S7030P)

ALLEGATION 1 that Brig Gen Robert Givens, from on about Sep 2010 to on or about Aug 2012, engaged in an inappropriate relationship with Mrs. [REDACTED], the wife of a fellow Air Force officer, in violation of Article 133 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Conduct Unbecoming an Officer and Gentlamsa, was SUBSTANTIATED.

https://www.af.mil/AboutUs/Biographies/Display/tabid/225/Article/108719/brigadier-general-robert-p-givens.aspx

Long's Report of Investigation (S7079P)

ALLEGATION 2. That beginning on or about April 2011, Colonel Scott C. Long engaged in an unprofessional relationship with Ms. [REDACTED] in violation of AFI 36-2909, Professional and Unprofessional Relationships, was SUBSTANTIATED.

https://www.388fw.acc.af.mil/library/biographies/bio.asp?id=14408

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...