10percenttruth Posted May 9, 2014 Posted May 9, 2014 Were the chicks that turned him in more offended by the cat brains, or by the pt shorts? 1
HU&W Posted May 9, 2014 Posted May 9, 2014 Were the chicks that turned him in more offended by the cat brains, or by the pt shorts? I think they didn't like being forced to debrief the incident. Sears came into the nearly empty student center, sat down at a table near them wearing Air Force physical training shorts with the inner liner cut out and exposed himself to them. He then approached the victims and asked them inappropriate and lewd questions regarding the exposure they had just witnessed. 4
HeloDude Posted May 10, 2014 Posted May 10, 2014 I think they didn't like being forced to debrief the incident. Nobody likes the debrief phase...
10percenttruth Posted May 10, 2014 Posted May 10, 2014 If he debriefed 2 hours for every 1 hour of beanbag exposure & used at least 4 different colors of marker on his board, he's a shoe-in to be a patch wearer in PMITA prison. 1
Napoleon_Tanerite Posted May 10, 2014 Posted May 10, 2014 If he hadn't debriefed he wouldn't be prepared for going out there in the first place! 2
M2 Posted May 12, 2014 Posted May 12, 2014 Apparently trying to pick up college girls with your junk hanging out of your PT gear is not the approved method. Officer gets dismissal, confinement for indecent exposure The dude looks like a sex offender... This version of the story is even more amusing... Court Martial Begins at Sheppard Involving Student Instructor Pilot Accused of Indecent Exposure A Sheppard student instructor pilot charged with indecent exposure enters a not guilty plea and his court martial continues. Second Lieutenant Benjamin Sears is accused of intentionally exposing himself to civilians at Midwestern State University in April and October of last year. In April last year three MSU nursing students say they saw Sears sitting at a table nearby, while they were studying for an exam. The girls say they noticed they could see Sear's genitals, they say he was wearing shorts and no underwear and that he had his legs spread very wide. First, they say they felt embarrassed for Sears, but then realized his exposure was on purpose. The girls filed a report, but MSU Police could not identify sears, until, one day in October when the girls spotted him again. Police later learned about another alleged incident that had not been officially reported. It involved a different group of girls, who say they also saw sears without underwear exposing himself inside the MSU student center. One of the victims said sears eventually approached them and told the girls he was doing a study with another girl about public nudity. She said Sears asked them a few questions and then asked them to "rate it" from a scale of one to ten. The girl said she really believed that he was doing a study and didn't think much of the incident which is why she never made a report. The defense team did not dispute the basic incidents, but said says Sears never touched himself in either incident and always kept his hands above the table, and say its undetermined if the acts were indecent. The government will bring two more witnesses to the stand Tuesday when the court martial continues. Currently sears has been removed from flying status and was barred from the MSU campus. If convicted as charged, sears faces a possible dismissal and two years confinement.
drewpey Posted May 12, 2014 Posted May 12, 2014 The dude looks like a sex offender... This version of the story is even more amusing... What was the criteria she was judging on a 1-10 scale, and what did she give it? Seriously they call this reporting?
JarheadBoom Posted May 13, 2014 Posted May 13, 2014 I trust no man that waxes his eyebrows. Ain't no way that shape is natural growth... 1
xaarman Posted May 13, 2014 Posted May 13, 2014 I feel so bad for posting this...https://www.cc.com/video-clips/ac9kui/inside-amy-schumer-a-very-realistic-military-game 1
Cornholio5 Posted May 18, 2014 Posted May 18, 2014 (edited) I always heard that going commando and hanging your junk out was the best way to pick up chicks....damn...I just hope he had his AF PT shorts on as well. Those really impress the ladies! Well, I guess this will add one more slide to an already unbelievably long SAPR CBT. Edited May 18, 2014 by Cornholio5
albertschu Posted May 18, 2014 Posted May 18, 2014 She said Sears asked them a few questions and then asked them to "rate it" from a scale of one to ten. The girl said she really believed that he was doing a study and didn't think much of the incident which is why she never made a report. That's why I use a clipboard. I think that extra touch (sts) of professionalism goes along way towards establishing credibility. FWIW, so far I'm been getting impressive results, 8.27 mean rating w/ a standard deviation of 1.27 among all female-nursing-students. However, among female-nursing-students-who-have-consumed-at-least-3-drinks-in-the-last-hour, my average rating jumps to 9.87 with a standard deviation of .07. I think this could be a major break through, but much more research is needed. Speaking of alcohol, that Hagel article is one of the most ridiculous things I've seen in a long time. In two out of every three sexual assaults, alcohol is involved in some way. But also in 99.997% of alcohol events, no sexual assault occurs. new anti-drinking campaign that will target the way alcohol is served and sold on military bases and in nearby communities Which will push alcohol off base and to communities further away, where there will less ability for us to police our own. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel ordered the four services to find new ways to “improve safety and reduce the risks posed by alcohol” and prepare an “implementation plan” no later than Nov. 1 Further taking focus away from the mission “Do you really need to sell someone five fifths of bourbon at 2 o’clock in the morning? Probably not,” Nate Galbreath, Is there any evidence that people who buy 5 bottles of bourbon at 0200 are more likely to assault someone? Restricting the hours the Class Six is open only forces people to plan ahead further or to go off base. growing belief at the Pentagon that the problems of sex crimes and binge drinking are inextricably linked. Is this belief based on facts? If so, do we understand the linkage? Will a 10.7% reduction in binge drinking result in a 10.7% reduction in sexual assault? On base, the services can consider measures such as restricting the time window for selling alcohol, discouraging happy-hour drink specials that lead to binge drinking Do we know that happy-hour drink specials lead to binge drinking? If so, are the sexual assaults that are inexorably linked to binge drinking linked to the binge drinking that results from going to O-Club at 1600 or the binge drinking that occurs at Lt Col Wilkerson's house parties? More simply, do we know of any cases where an on-base drink special played a significant role in a sexual assault? That could be as simple as asking bars to routinely offer food menus with drinks as a way to encourage patrons not to drink on empty stomachs Ok, so now rapists will have to buy their victims dinner first. Not really addressing the problem. 8
Learjetter Posted May 18, 2014 Posted May 18, 2014 (edited) Nice criticisms, Albert. Got any suggestions? Ever read the JAG reports on sexual assault convictions? Do you have any ideas on how to do these three things: 1) create a service culture that abhors sexual assault? 2) ensure credible sexual assault claims are fairly and thoroughly investigated, and 3) to eliminate the threat that non-credible sexual assault claims have on careers? Without voicing your ideas, the service will keep coming up with their own. ETA: your critique that this is a distraction from mission focus is spot-on. But the service does have a basic responsibility to provide a relatively safe working environment for all of us. Hazard mitigation includes crime prevention. Edited May 18, 2014 by Learjetter
albertschu Posted May 19, 2014 Posted May 19, 2014 Nice criticisms, Albert. Thanks. Ever read the JAG reports on sexual assault convictions? No. Do you have any ideas on how to do these three things: 1) create a service culture that abhors sexual assault? 2) ensure credible sexual assault claims are fairly and thoroughly investigated, and 3) to eliminate the threat that non-credible sexual assault claims have on careers? Well, I would start by making those stated objectives. Instead, SECDEF has tasked the services to "improve safety and reduce the risk posed by alcohol" and to prepare an "implementation plan." The focus is on alcohol and on the plan--not on sexual assault. The wording you used would be much more effective guidance. Your words put much more focus on the actual problems and don't micromanage the solution. Regarding how to "create a service culture that abhors sexual assault", I would start by looking patterns. Do we know what sexual assault abhorrence looks like? Would we know it if we saw it? Do we have some communities that already abhor sexual assault? What things are those communities doing differently? Do some leaders appear to have a history of tolerating sexual assault? Can they be eliminated? Can we predict which units will have more sexual assaults? Can we identify other conditions that can predict sexual assault? [side note: I don't think that alcohol consumption by itself is an effective predictor of sexual assault because, by far, the majority of times alcohol is consumed no sexual assault occurs.] Without voicing your ideas, the service will keep coming up with their own. Unfortunately, the service won't come up their own, they'll do what SECDEF told them to do. ETA: your critique that this is a distraction from mission focus is spot-on. But the service does have a basic responsibility to provide a relatively safe working environment for all of us. Hazard mitigation includes crime prevention. 100% agree that that we have a responsibility to provide a safe working environment, which includes crime prevention. For clarification my comment was directed at the alcohol risk reduction implementation plan, which I don't think will accomplish anything towards reducing sexual assault. I don't think that legitimate efforts to prevent crime is a distraction. 4
17D_guy Posted May 19, 2014 Posted May 19, 2014 Isn't this the... 3rd alcohol reduction program they've attempted in the past 5 years? Wasn't there some culture thing, and a 3-3-1-1... something? Did those work to lower sexual assault? 1
FlyFastLiveSlow Posted May 23, 2014 Posted May 23, 2014 The only way to reduce assaults is to find perpetrators, prosecute, and discharge them. No amount of education will change these people. Who the F goes to bat for them? 1
sqwatch Posted May 23, 2014 Posted May 23, 2014 (edited) The only way to reduce assaults is to find perpetrators, prosecute, and discharge them. No amount of education will change these people. Who the F goes to bat for them? Edited May 23, 2014 by sqwatch
TreeA10 Posted June 3, 2014 Posted June 3, 2014 Army guy is a member of the sexual assault and harassment program.....and running a prostitution ring. Maybe he viewed it as a "how to" vs a "don't do" program and lost something in translation. FORT HOOD, Texas (CBS Houston/AP) — A Fort Hood sergeant is scheduled to appear in military court to answer allegations that he set up a prostitution ring with cash-strapped female soldiers. Sgt. 1st Class Gregory McQueen is accused of pandering and several other offenses. McQueen was a low-level coordinator in Fort Hood’s sexual assault and harassment program — at a time when the military’s response to assault cases has been severely criticized. McQueen will appear Tuesday at an Article 32 hearing, which in the military system is similar to a grand jury proceeding. KWTX-TV reports that McQueen was initially identified as the focus of the investigation in May 2013 and was first charged in March. The hearing is expected to last two days. Another Fort Hood soldier has already been demoted and reprimanded in the case for conspiring to patronize a prostitute and solicitation to commit adultery. McQueen is facing a court-martial. (TM and © Copyright 2014 CBS Radio Inc. and its relevant subsidiaries. CBS RADIO and EYE Logo TM and Copyright 2014 CBS Broadcasting Inc. Used under license. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)
waveshaper Posted June 4, 2014 Posted June 4, 2014 Navy Captain Ignored Lewd Conduct in Blue Angels.Quote "The blue and gold penis was visible from satellite imagery on Google Maps and existed through the end of the 2012airshow season.The penis is no longer visible on Google Maps, the investigation states." end Quotehttps://www.military.com/daily-news/2014/06/03/navy-captain-ignored-lewd-conduct-in-blue-angels.html?comp=700001075741&rank=1
AnimalMother Posted June 4, 2014 Posted June 4, 2014 What I'm taking away from this is that all I have to do to get my commander fired is draw a huge cock and balls in the squadron parking lot. 3
nsplayr Posted June 4, 2014 Posted June 4, 2014 Better update my ISOPREP, my pre-briefed GTAS was a huge cock and balls pointing toward my hole-up site... 4
Smokin Posted June 5, 2014 Posted June 5, 2014 "In addition, the digital messaging system GroupMe, which was used by the squadron, was often littered with conversations containing pornographic imagery, often of male genitalia, as well as “vulgar, homophobic, and sexually suggestive statements.” At least he wasn't reinforcing any stereotypes...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now