Hacker Posted June 30, 2013 Posted June 30, 2013 Why would any of these actions have an impact on a security clearance?
M2 Posted June 30, 2013 Posted June 30, 2013 Why would any of these actions have an impact on a security clearance? "Multiple minor traffic infractions without allegations of other criminal conduct would not be an issue under the Criminal Conduct criterion. However, they can be considered under the Personal Conduct criterion along with any other dishonest, unreliable, or rule-breaking behavior." Considering the other actions of this individual, it could have an impact on his clearance especially when it appears he is actively pursuing them as shown in that video. I just hope he captures it on video when he's tazed! 1
FlyinGrunt Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 I thought that name sounded familiar. Then I read the DFC. Yep. Murph, we don't claim him . . . and seeing as he's in MQ-9s, apparently even the 73rd won't. Which says something. <apologies for 73rd hate, just kidding . . . about them at least>
Catbox Posted July 3, 2013 Posted July 3, 2013 "Multiple minor traffic infractions without allegations of other criminal conduct would not be an issue under the Criminal Conduct criterion. However, they can be considered under the Personal Conduct criterion along with any other dishonest, unreliable, or rule-breaking behavior." Considering the other actions of this individual, it could have an impact on his clearance especially when it appears he is actively pursuing them as shown in that video. I just hope he captures it on video when he's tazed! You realize you just came up with his next blog topic: "Nazi board moderator advocates tazing the last true patriot for defending the constitution"
Recut Posted July 3, 2013 Posted July 3, 2013 Smoke screens and door handles that shock! Veterans against the Po-Po....hell yeah! This is some funny shit.
SurelySerious Posted May 5, 2014 Posted May 5, 2014 I'm an officer, this is the US, and I should have the right to voice my opinion on this forum. Small sense of entitlement. 1
hispeed7721 Posted May 5, 2014 Posted May 5, 2014 The Jews are taking over! The Jews are taking over! I hear a conspiracy theory about worldwide Jewish domination coming in 3...2..1... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
10percenttruth Posted May 5, 2014 Posted May 5, 2014 That was incredible. I can't believe he's on queue, y'all must be a bunch of Jews to deny such a mentally stable & well-rounded USAF officer his constitutionally-guaranteed right to post on an Internet forum! For shame! 1
hispeed7721 Posted May 8, 2014 Posted May 8, 2014 This topic, the Constitution, doesn't have nearly the same importance in your lives as AFPC and TIB. Ummmm.... If that's the case for you then I'm very, VERY sorry for you. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Prozac Posted May 8, 2014 Posted May 8, 2014 My God! Guys listen to what USAF pilot is saying! Apparently it's possible (and may even be prevalent) for special interest groups to influence politics in this country. SOMETHING MUST BE DONE!!!
10percenttruth Posted May 10, 2014 Posted May 10, 2014 And I suppose you have some sort of "final solution" to this problem? 1 2
HeloDude Posted May 10, 2014 Posted May 10, 2014 And I suppose you have some sort of "final solution" to this problem? ...anddddd...you just went there.
Goblin Posted May 10, 2014 Posted May 10, 2014 And I suppose you have some sort of "final solution" to this problem? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
matmacwc Posted May 12, 2014 Posted May 12, 2014 Hey Prozac, here's the deal. We all know special interest groups have major influence. A handful of those special interest groups yield outsized influence. There is one thing that separates AIPAC from the rest. NRA represents millions of AMERICANS who support the Second Amendment. AARP represents millions of AMERICANS in a certain age range. AIPAC represents ISRAEL. Almost all major special interest groups have some liberal or conservative leaning, and take heat from the other side. AIPAC takes absolutely ZERO heat from Democrats or Republicans, out of fear. AIPAC can make politicians from either party win or lose, based purely on whether or not the politician is supportive of the AIPAC/Israel agenda, or critical of it.https://politicalcorrection.org/fpmatters/201105270008 My post wasn't even about AIPAC, though AIPAC is a large portion of the concern. The post is about how a very tiny FOREIGN country and a very tiny US demographic has CONTROLLING influence over the AMERICAN agenda and media narrative. All I've stated in this thread are facts, and pointed out some relationships and commonalities. Hopefully more Americans wake up to this and understand the repercussions of these relationships and special interest groups. PYB?
Sizzofoshizzo Posted July 24, 2014 Posted July 24, 2014 There is a CSO T-6 Instructor Pilot out here in Pensacola who is going to be on the Fox News Channel this weekend, talking about many of the issues in this thread (Saturday and Sunday night at 10PM eastern time). It's the John Stossel special called, "Policing America: Security vs Liberty." He was also quoted in a Slate Magazine article the other day, saying: "I am not politically active,” says Richard Rynearson during a Skype call from South Korea. "I am a military officer, and I took an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States against foreign and domestic enemies. When I am deployed I focus on foreign enemies, and when I am here, I focus on the domestic ones.” John Stossel published an article today (Policing America) about his upcoming special, and it mirrors the Slate Magazine article, and Bill Maher's latest episode on HBO and that common theme is that liberals, libertarians, and conservatives and people from all walks of life are starting to galvanize in their hatred of a police state. Anybody think this is happening? Are Americans actually starting to join together because they don't want government violating their American rights in our Constitution? Should be an interesting show this weekend. As a wise man once said, never trust the media -- words to live by.
czecksikhs Posted July 24, 2014 Posted July 24, 2014 There is a CSO T-6 Instructor Pilot out here in Pensacola who is going to be on the Fox News Channel this weekend, talking about many of the issues in this thread (Saturday and Sunday night at 10PM eastern time). It's the John Stossel special called, "Policing America: Security vs Liberty." He was also quoted in a Slate Magazine article the other day, saying: John Stossel published an article today (Policing America) about his upcoming special, and it mirrors the Slate Magazine article, and Bill Maher's latest episode on HBO and that common theme is that liberals, libertarians, and conservatives and people from all walks of life are starting to galvanize in their hatred of a police state. Anybody think this is happening? Are Americans actually starting to join together because they don't want government violating their American rights in our Constitution? Should be an interesting show this weekend. As a wise man once said, never trust the media -- words to live by. Now you've done it....
ThreeHoler Posted July 24, 2014 Posted July 24, 2014 I might DVR it just to watch the crazy train go off the rails.
SurelySerious Posted July 24, 2014 Posted July 24, 2014 (edited) There is a CSO T-6 Instructor Pilot out here in Pensacola Should be an interesting show this weekend. As a wise man once said, never trust the media -- words to live by.Glad he's somewhere imparting wisdom to young guys. Waiting for this to be a public decision to take his talents for a full time dedication to domestic enemies. Edited July 24, 2014 by SurelySerious
Sizzofoshizzo Posted July 24, 2014 Posted July 24, 2014 Glad he's somewhere imparting wisdom to young guys. Waiting for this to be a public decision to take his talents for a full time dedication to domestic enemies. He's got less than two years until retirement, so I don't think you will have to wait long.
Sizzofoshizzo Posted July 24, 2014 Posted July 24, 2014 So does anybody have thoughts on my question? Are differing political stripes and ways of life converging into agreement that a police state violating our rights is not acceptable? POLICING AMERICA: SECURITY VS. LIBERTY Where's the line between security and liberty? American police are now armed like the military; they use their power more often and forcefully than ever before. The state has new and expanding powers to spy on almost everything you do. THE WARRIOR COP: SWAT teams were once called out only in emergencies. Now there are almost 100 raids a day. The weapons and tactics they use come straight from the military. Sometimes innocent people are killed. Why use so much force so often? What would you do if armed men in masks broke down your door in the middle of the night? CONSTITUTION-FREE ZONES: Lots of Americans are getting upset about being detained by armed border patrol agents not on the border but miles away from the border. Some push back, sometimes with violent results. MANDATORY MINIMUMS: Do mandatory minimum sentences work? Prosecutors like them because they give them more power when they plea bargain with suspects. But judges often object, and sometimes people serve long sentences for trivial crimes. Or no crime. NSA SPYING: New revelations surface almost daily on ways the Feds spy on Americans. Does this make us safer? Or invade our privacy in destructive ways? I SPY: Government spying is one thing. Now new, cheaper "personal" drones make it easy for anyone to spy on anyone. Some say: "I've got nothing to hide. Why should I care?" But then why do you have drapes? Stossel goes to Florida to test the spying power of personal drones. LEGALIZE WEED: Washington State and Colorado just legalized marijuana for recreational use. Could this be the start of America's trillion dollar drug-war coming to an end? Former advisor to the president Kevin Sabet says: "Colorado will show why legalizing marijuana is a mistake." Guests Radley Balko, "Rise of the Warrior Cop" Author Sr. Cpl .Steve Claggett, Dallas SWAT (Ret) Maj. Steve Ijames, Springfield, MO SWAT (Ret) Sgt. Charles Huth, Kansas City SWAT Leader Joe Lipari, Home Raided by SWAT Kevin Sabet, Fmr. Sr. Advisor - Office of National Drug Control Policy Tony Ryan, Retired Denver Police Lieutenant Rep. Peter King, New York ® Sen. Rand Paul, Kentucky ® James Duff Lyall, ACLU Staff Attorney Rick Rynearson, Iraq and Afghanistan War Veteran Lis Wiehl, Fox News Legal Analyst Greg Newburn, Families Against Mandatory Minimums Lawrence and Lamont Garrison, Served Mandatory Minimum Sentence Kurt Knutsson, CyberGuy.com
Recommended Posts