Lord Ratner Posted March 21 Posted March 21 19 minutes ago, Lawman said: Yes if there is anything Lawyers use in their arguments it’s public statements in media you can google and not legal briefs or scholarly articles. Again, the fact you are trying to use this singular example to defend the idea of warning shot, which still lacks any form of definition in the courts majority opinion, and the original discussion that took us down this rabbit hole was a guy firing a firearm in the air to stop people on his property engaged in no form of assault, they were cutting down trees. Try finding somebody reputable in any self defense legal circles recommending warning shots… please I dare you. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk You're kind of missing the boat here. By allowing for a claim of self-defense, based specifically on warning shots, the Ohio court has taken the first step towards changing the precedent. A whole lot of people recommend a whole lot of things, and many of those things are based on what will and won't be easier to defend in court. That doesn't make anything that goes against that recommendation illegal. There's a very big difference between arguing what is legally allowable (or what is becoming legally allowable, in the case of Ohio) and what is the best response. The ladder is also an opinion.
HeloDude Posted March 21 Posted March 21 The court said that warning shots can be considered part of self defense if the self defense claim is warranted. If you see it differently then we’ll just have to disagree.
Lawman Posted March 21 Posted March 21 You're kind of missing the boat here. By allowing for a claim of self-defense, based specifically on warning shots, the Ohio court has taken the first step towards changing the precedent. A whole lot of people recommend a whole lot of things, and many of those things are based on what will and won't be easier to defend in court. That doesn't make anything that goes against that recommendation illegal. There's a very big difference between arguing what is legally allowable (or what is becoming legally allowable, in the case of Ohio) and what is the best response. The ladder is also an opinion.Again, do you want to be the first person to attempt to cross that threshold or for that matter know whoever gets to be that test dummy? Until someone successfully does that there is no codified standard for every single other court Ohio or otherwise to use in consideration of bringing charges against somebody for firing a warning shot. Even when there is, it will be case by case to classify what is a legal warning and what is reckless mishandling of a firearm, and civil penalty will still apply state to state which is its own nightmare. Ohio didn’t do anything of substance to actually allow somebody to be so stupid as to use a warning shot and expect anything but an extremely painful and taxing outcome. The people applauding this or the “legal experts” in places like Glocktalk or SAF circles are giving terribly short sighted advice based largely off a poor understanding of how the prosecutorial process is evaluated and executed. You’ll notice the actual charges are mentioned, that’s because that charges would allow for the affirmative defense of “acting in self defense” and it helped widen that potential umbrella but in this case the judge denied that incorrectly and the lawyer didn’t do his job. And an affirmative defense is not the same as guilty until proven innocent, you now place the obligation for preponderance of evidence on the defendant. Had the prosecutor gone after this guy for say reckless endangerment and he had been the first person to cross the threat threshold from say strong words to an active posture, an affirmative defense wouldn’t have been allowed in the courtroom and the judges instructions to deny such consideration by the jury would have been proper. You can read in the amicus brief on the actual case one of the reasons the court wanted a an affirmative self defense to be allowed (again one of the reasons for overturn but not nearly as much as ineffective council) was that it didn’t allow the jury consider whether Wilson had legal standing to fear for his safety and then be allowed to use the force continuum at all in his defense. Had he not warning shot or lethal aimed kill shot wouldn’t have mattered because the initial top charge wasn’t felonious assault. This case is not the sudden “warning shots are ok now” that some barracks lawyers are trying to argue it as. And until it’s successfully used to overturn a conviction when there are states with case law going the other way leading to an eventual federal appeals process no, you’re not suddenly covered under self defense with this ruling or any of the previous ones that exist on the books. For the love of god don’t use that term ever when discussing a post firearm related incident in a statement. It will go nowhere good. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Boomer6 Posted March 21 Posted March 21 Man how bout those chicoms... Or should I post this in the gun talk thread so as not to interrupt this legalese circle-jerk 🤔 https://www.forbes.com/sites/tylerroush/2024/03/20/china-will-be-ready-to-invade-taiwan-by-2027-us-admiral-says/?sh=3465b32612c4
mp5g Posted March 21 Posted March 21 Me: “Hello.” All posts since 17 hrs ago: “Yeah?!?” Me: “Umm..I’m here to read about China & Chinese Shenanigans.” 6
Clark Griswold Posted July 1 Posted July 1 Commute worthy on the subject of Asian Pivot Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ClearedHot Posted July 3 Posted July 3 As Peter Zeihan has been predicting, China is HURTING! The real estate bubble has burst and their economy is paying the price, 80 to 90 MILLION Empty apartments. China's largest developer, "The Evergrande Group" has been ordered to liquidate it's assets. 66% of the average Chinese retirement/wealth is in real estate...big trouble ahead.
herkbum Posted July 3 Posted July 3 As Peter Zeihan has been predicting, China is HURTING! The real estate bubble has burst and their economy is paying the price, 80 to 90 MILLION Empty apartments. China's largest developer, "The Evergrande Group" has been ordered to liquidate it's assets. 66% of the average Chinese retirement/wealth is in real estate...big trouble ahead. [/url] It’s amazing the amount of building going on there. Construction cranes everywhere. I’ve stayed in Shanghai and Chongking and on the ride from the airport to the hotel, it was very surprising at how dark these buildings were. My assumption was they were empty since there was zero light emitted. But these apartment buildings were everywhere. Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app
Lord Ratner Posted July 3 Posted July 3 2 hours ago, herkbum said: It’s amazing the amount of building going on there. Construction cranes everywhere. I’ve stayed in Shanghai and Chongking and on the ride from the airport to the hotel, it was very surprising at how dark these buildings were. My assumption was they were empty since there was zero light emitted. But these apartment buildings were everywhere. Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app It's not going to be pretty.
SocialD Posted July 3 Posted July 3 Guys, I've got an idea. Go (re)read the big short and get back to me after. Foolproof!
GrndPndr Posted July 3 Posted July 3 Then there's the static fire test of the Tianlong-3 last week. Perhaps someone forgot to bolt it in place? Anyway, entertaining from a 4th of July fireworks perspective...
uhhello Posted July 3 Posted July 3 3 minutes ago, GrndPndr said: Then there's the static fire test of the Tianlong-3 last week. Perhaps someone forgot to bolt it in place? Anyway, entertaining from a 4th of July fireworks perspective... SpaceX left that out of the plans they stole 1
HeloDude Posted July 3 Posted July 3 Sounds like a good reason (they would believe?) to invade Taiwan…? Maybe? I think given Biden’s recent debate performance the CCP would be more likely now vs prior to last month.
SurelySerious Posted July 3 Posted July 3 Then there's the static fire test of the Tianlong-3 last week. Perhaps someone forgot to bolt it in place? Anyway, entertaining from a 4th of July fireworks perspective... SpaceX left that out of the plans they stoleSomeone forgot mission analysis for their implied tasks. 1
ViperMan Posted July 4 Posted July 4 15 hours ago, ClearedHot said: As Peter Zeihan has been predicting, China is HURTING! The real estate bubble has burst and their economy is paying the price, 80 to 90 MILLION Empty apartments. China's largest developer, "The Evergrande Group" has been ordered to liquidate it's assets. 66% of the average Chinese retirement/wealth is in real estate...big trouble ahead. Call me crazy, but I think I smell a solution to our immigration problem... 1 1
Swizzle Posted July 4 Posted July 4 9 hours ago, ViperMan said: Call me crazy, but I think I smell a solution to our immigration problem... Thought provoking: now what is the equivalent of a Mexican or Chinese restaurant in China if it's nothing but Latinos and Chinese??
ViperMan Posted July 5 Posted July 5 10 hours ago, Swizzle said: Thought provoking: now what is the equivalent of a Mexican or Chinese restaurant in China if it's nothing but Latinos and Chinese?? I envision something like this: 2
Biff_T Posted July 6 Posted July 6 On 7/3/2024 at 11:48 AM, GrndPndr said: Then there's the static fire test of the Tianlong-3 last week. Perhaps someone forgot to bolt it in place? Anyway, entertaining from a 4th of July fireworks perspective... I made it closer to space in a Huey. Good job China! 2
fire4effect Posted July 9 Posted July 9 https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=video&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjFgPHl-JmHAxVz8MkDHT-VDNQQtwJ6BAgNEAI&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DT4bn1WG5LS0&usg=AOvVaw2cDUODB0VSCeKSo5xx7TGa&opi=89978449 Here's a classic
FourFans Posted July 9 Posted July 9 42 minutes ago, fire4effect said: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=video&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjFgPHl-JmHAxVz8MkDHT-VDNQQtwJ6BAgNEAI&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DT4bn1WG5LS0&usg=AOvVaw2cDUODB0VSCeKSo5xx7TGa&opi=89978449 Here's a classic Looked like that jet worked great! Look how fast it moved!
Lawman Posted July 9 Posted July 9 https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=video&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjFgPHl-JmHAxVz8MkDHT-VDNQQtwJ6BAgNEAI&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DT4bn1WG5LS0&usg=AOvVaw2cDUODB0VSCeKSo5xx7TGa&opi=89978449 Here's a classicThose Harbor Freight fasteners are cheaper for a reason…Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1
ClearedHot Posted September 11 Posted September 11 Satellite image from August 28 of the PLA's amphibious landing exercise in Dacheng Bay, adjacent to China's Fujian Province. China is seriously preparing for a landing operation in the Taiwan direction.
Clark Griswold Posted September 12 Posted September 12 Satellite image from August 28 of the PLA's amphibious landing exercise in Dacheng Bay, adjacent to China's Fujian Province. China is seriously preparing for a landing operation in the Taiwan direction. YupCommute worthy conversation on the subject There’s a lotta good nuggets in this conversation, a good bit is well worn ground but what I found particularly interesting is the discussion he has on the spiritual preparation for sacrifice Xi has started, don’t see an American leader anytime soon giving a guns vs butter speech, or why Americans should defend the Spratly Islands, if intend to resist aggression by the PRC in the SCS, whoever becomes POTUS needs to make that speech now methinks Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1
SurelySerious Posted September 12 Posted September 12 YupCommute worthy conversation on the subject There’s a lotta good nuggets in this conversation, a good bit is well worn ground but what I found particularly interesting is the discussion he has on the spiritual preparation for sacrifice Xi has started, don’t see an American leader anytime soon giving a guns vs butter speech, or why Americans should defend the Spratly Islands, if intend to resist aggression by the PRC in the SCS, whoever becomes POTUS needs to make that speech now methinks Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkOne of the candidates thinks that Taiwan should pay us tit-for-tat for defending them, so that speech isn’t going to happen. The other…who can say what their position is on anything. Good luck with any strategic words on the matter. Our country has no strategy.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now