9 AF SII regarding checklist discipline

[stract]

does anyone know the background story to the 9 AF SII that was just released regarding checklist discipline/not deviating from checklists? I'm assuming there is more to the story...

[Breckey]

Did another C-17 forget to put the gear down?

[SocialD]

Now, when you say checklist...what exactly do you mean?

[Warrior]

Another example of the numbered AF doing something to help the line guys out?

[stract]

this SII is worded such that there might have been a willful disregard which then resulted in something not good happening. Sorry don't have the exact memo to post, it's loaded in PEX and I'm at home with no access outside a mil network.

[Azimuth]

Did another C-17 forget to put the gear down?

There's one C-17 Sq in ACC. So probably not.

[Breckey]

There's one C-17 Sq in ACC. So probably not.

And I just learned that 9th AF is no longer AFCENT. Shows how long it's been since I've needed to know it.

[FUSEPLUG]

Was the phrase, "back to basics" used in the SII summary? I love it when they throw that one around. I've been back to basics at least three times in the last ten years.

[Champ Kind]

SIIs, FCIFs, and sternly-worded emails fix everything.

[Clark Griswold]

or a strongly worded letter...

[HossHarris]

What do numbered air forces do for me again?

[Gravedigger]

They take the taskers from the MAJCOM and deliver them to the wings. They're people people.They deal with the MAJCOMs so the wings don't have to.

Shut em all down.

[HossHarris]

So they physically carry the taskers?

[Butters]

Well no, the secretary does.

[stract]

they already told you, they deal with the goddamn customers!