di1630 Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 Which airframes are in the running? USAF only? Given a super hornet got the first “actual” a/a shot in about 20 years and 16/15e’s were actually tasked with DCA, genuinely curious the metrics.
Clark Griswold Posted May 8, 2018 Author Posted May 8, 2018 Interesting article on the Su-57 https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/20434/no-the-su-57-isnt-junk-six-features-we-like-on-russias-new-fighter
isuguy1234 Posted May 8, 2018 Posted May 8, 2018 Couple years ago they changed the Raytheon Trophy from the "Best A/A squadron in the USAF" to the "Best Fighter Squadron in the USAF." One of the LN Mudhen squadrons won it this year.
Clark Griswold Posted July 17, 2018 Author Posted July 17, 2018 Brits wanna build an LO fighter.. https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/22190/the-u-k-s-new-tempest-stealth-fighter-project-already-faces-serious-challenges
Lawman Posted July 17, 2018 Posted July 17, 2018 Brits wanna build an LO fighter.. https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/22190/the-u-k-s-new-tempest-stealth-fighter-project-already-faces-serious-challenges The U.K.-headquartered firm will lead “Team Tempest,” which also includes engine-maker Rolls-Royce, Italian defense contractor Leonardo, and the European missile consortium MBDA.....Because we learned F@ck-all from Tornado, Typhoon, Eurocopter Tiger....Jesus guys. You were the only country with a legitimate chance at getting Raptor and that got jacked up for Typhoon... now they want to repeat history when we will sell literally anybody not Russia/China F-35s to get the per unit cost down and even let them build their own.
di1630 Posted July 17, 2018 Posted July 17, 2018 Because we learned F@ck-all from Tornado, Typhoon, Eurocopter Tiger....Jesus guys. You were the only country with a legitimate chance at getting Raptor and that got jacked up for Typhoon...So so sooooo true. Stay away from anything European.
YoungnDumb Posted July 17, 2018 Posted July 17, 2018 5 hours ago, di1630 said: Stay away from anything European. Does that include the beer and the women?
brabus Posted July 17, 2018 Posted July 17, 2018 3 hours ago, YoungnDumb said: Does that include the beer and the women? Contrary to popular belief, stupid questions do exist. 4
Lawman Posted July 17, 2018 Posted July 17, 2018 Contrary to popular belief, stupid questions do exist. Just remember with the Eastern Europeans, it’s not genetics but poverty that keeps them that skinny.Also Germany is the ugly friend of most of Europe. 2 1
Clark Griswold Posted July 18, 2018 Author Posted July 18, 2018 The U.K.-headquartered firm will lead “Team Tempest,” which also includes engine-maker Rolls-Royce, Italian defense contractor Leonardo, and the European missile consortium MBDA.....Because we learned F@ck-all from Tornado, Typhoon, Eurocopter Tiger....Jesus guys. You were the only country with a legitimate chance at getting Raptor and that got jacked up for Typhoon... now they want to repeat history when we will sell literally anybody not Russia/China F-35s to get the per unit cost down and even let them build their own.YupThe French have an economy slightly smaller than the Brits and managed to build their own 4+ fighter for their AF / Naval Air to meet their requirements - just takes the will to go your own way and keep it real.
YoungnDumb Posted July 18, 2018 Posted July 18, 2018 9 hours ago, brabus said: Contrary to popular belief, stupid questions do exist. Check my username, very aware of such. It was asked sarcastically/in a vain attempt to interject some humor. 8 hours ago, Lawman said: Just remember with the Eastern Europeans, it’s not genetics but poverty that keeps them that skinny. In my case, beggars can't really be choosers, I'll take what I can get.
brabus Posted July 18, 2018 Posted July 18, 2018 Check my username, very aware of such. It was asked sarcastically/in a vain attempt to interject some humor. I know, I was also being sarcastic and making joke. 1
di1630 Posted July 18, 2018 Posted July 18, 2018 YupThe French have an economy slightly smaller than the Brits and managed to build their own 4+ fighter for their AF / Naval Air to meet their requirements - just takes the will to go your own way and keep it real.Good point. French were smart on that one. The Raphael is much better than the Eurofighter.
BFM this Posted July 18, 2018 Posted July 18, 2018 35 minutes ago, di1630 said: Good point. French were smart on that one. The Raphael is much better than the Eurofighter. Raphael: Rafale: Subtle distinction, but different. 2 2
di1630 Posted July 18, 2018 Posted July 18, 2018 Subtle distinction, but different.Thanks. I still pronounce the p in Gripen when I talk to my Saab pilot friends as well.Rafale = gust of wind so I think I’ll just call it the “gust” and see if it catches on during the next LFE.
billy pilgrim Posted July 18, 2018 Posted July 18, 2018 7 hours ago, di1630 said: Good point. French were smart on that one. The Raphael is much better than the Eurofighter. It's like the tree falling in the forest. If the Europeans make a good fighter does anyone care?
Lawman Posted July 19, 2018 Posted July 19, 2018 It's like the tree falling in the forest. If the Europeans make a good fighter does anyone care?Well the Saudi’s will... only because the treat equipping an Air Force the same way they treat filling their garages. Buy every flavor of super cars they can’t drive/maintain and then throw oil money and Phil labor at the problems afterward...
B52gator Posted July 19, 2018 Posted July 19, 2018 The X is for EXTREME!!! https://www.defenseone.com/business/2018/07/boeing-pitching-new-f-15-using-its-super-hornet-game-plan/149839/ Boeing is quietly pitching the U.S. Air Force a new F-15 fighter jet using the same business strategy that convinced the Trump administration to buy more Super Hornet warplanes for the Navy. Dubbed the F-15X, the new variant of the venerable jet offers more modern flight controls, cockpit displays, and radar, according to military and industry sources with knowledge of the plan. The plane would also pack a lot of firepower, carrying more than two dozen air-to-air missiles, the most of any U.S. Air Force aircraft. Boeing officials declined to explicitly confirm their efforts to sell the F-15X, except perhaps obliquely: “We see the marketplace expanding internationally and it’s creating opportunities then to go back and talk to the U.S. Air Force about what might be future upgrades or even potentially future acquisitions of the F-15 aircraft,” Gene Cunningham, vice president of global sales of Defense, Space & Security, said Friday at the Royal International Air Tattoo in England. The Air Force has not purchased new F-15s since placing a 2001 order for five F-15E Strike Eagles, a two-seat version that can bomb ground targets and shoot down other aircraft. The original F-15 first flew in 1972, and many of the Air Force’s current air-to-air Eagles entered service in the 1980s. Many of them are older than the pilots who fly them. Unlike its successful Super Hornet pitch to the Trump administration last year, the F-15 pitch has not made its way to White House, according to sources with knowledge of the project. When Trump visited a Boeing commercial factory in South Carolina in February 2017, reporters traveling with the President spotted then-Chief of Staff Reince Priebus with a Boeing white paper that compared an advanced version of the Super Hornetto the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter made by rival Lockheed Martin. Air Force leaders say they are currently evaluating their mix of aircraft. “We have a new National Defense Strategy and the Air Force is working through the process of determining what Air Force is needed to meet that new National Defense Strategy and how do you represent that to the world, Gen. James “Mike” Holmes, the head of Air Combat Command, said June 28 at a Defense Writers Group breakfast in Washington. Among the options being considered are new versions of F-15s and F-16s, according to one Air Force observer. American allies Israel, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, and South Korea fly tailored versions of the F-15. The newest member of the Eagle club is Qatar, which ordered 36 aircraft last year and has an option for 36 more. Boeing is also pitching the F-15 to Germany, which wants to replace its Tornado jets. Boeing’s Cunningham, said the firm is also offering upgrades to existing F-15s with technology used in the newer ally aircraft. The F-15 is considered a fourth-generation plane, one that does not have a stealth design, which helps it evade enemy missiles. For more than a decade, Air Force leaders have long pressed for buying only stealthy fighter and bomber aircraft. Buying new F-15s would reverse that. “This is the most traction I’ve ever seen legacy four [generation aircraft] get in the Air Force,” the Air Force observer said. The F-15 was supposed to be replaced the by the stealthy F-22 Raptor — considered the top air-to-air combat fighter. Despite objections from top Air Force generals, then-Defense Secretary Robert Gates ordered an end to F-22 production in 2009. The final jet came off of Lockheed Martin’s Marietta, Georgia, production line in 2012. In all, the Air Force purchased 187 Raptors, far less than the more than 750 originally planned. At the time, Gates opted to invest in the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, a multi-role fighter, which can shoot down planes and attack targets on the ground with its array of advanced sensors, radar and sensors. Foreign versions of the F-15 have received newer technology not around when the American planes were built. Over the years, U.S.F-15s have received upgrades to their radars and cockpits, but the Air Force recently canceled an effort to add electronic jammers to its older F-15Cs. Some Air Force observers said that indicates the service might retire the plane sooner than planned. Boeing has long pitched new versions of the Strike Eagle to the Air Force and international customers. In 2010, the firm pitched the Silent Eagle — an F-15 with special coating and canted vertical tails — that executives said could better evade enemy detection. In 2015, it pitched an upgrade to the F-15C — the aerial combat version — that would allow it to carry 16 air-to-air missiles. At times, Boeing has argued that upgraded versions of their planes could come close to matching the advanced stealth, sensors and electronic warfare capabilities of the F-35 at a fraction of the cost. Now the savings might not be as much as the price tag of the Air Force F-35 has been dropping annually. The Pentagon on Sunday announced it has a handshake agreement with Lockheed Martin for a new batch of 141 F-35 Joint Strike Fighters. The Air Force version of the plane cost about $89 million per copy, according to a Reuters. An Air Force source noted that buying new F-15s now would not be seen as competing with the F-35 since the the Joint Strike Fighter has never been considered a replacement for the F-15.
Sprkt69 Posted July 21, 2018 Posted July 21, 2018 https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2018/07/20/homeland-defense-missions-organizational-issues-kneecap-f-22s-potential-gao-says/ Cant say I’m surprised. Maybe this will help buy some new Eagles/Vipers
YoungnDumb Posted July 21, 2018 Posted July 21, 2018 As much as I would love to see that, I doubt it, the AF will use it to pump more money to the F-35
di1630 Posted July 21, 2018 Posted July 21, 2018 Copy, common sense stuff any mid level captain could probably recognize on how to organize F-22’s for efficiency but we are stuck with management that blows so this is no surprise.
Clark Griswold Posted July 21, 2018 Author Posted July 21, 2018 An initial opinion on the RAF Tempest concept: https://hushkit.net/2018/07/19/project-tempest-6th-generation-combat-aircraft-assessed-by-former-british-technical-liaison/
Clark Griswold Posted July 30, 2018 Author Posted July 30, 2018 More on F-15XXX... https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/22372/exclusive-unmasking-the-f-15x-boeings-f-15c-d-eagle-replacement-fighter From the article: "Still, next to nothing is known about this initiative, including where it came from and what it entails exactly. Although it has been framed as a Boeing solicitation to the USAF, the opposite is actually true—the USAF began the discussion over a year and a half ago." Very interesting that this is not the Boeing Good Idea Fairy trying to coax the AF into something but the AF making an inquiry.
YoungnDumb Posted July 31, 2018 Posted July 31, 2018 $20 says nothing comes of this (and I hope I'm wrong).
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now