Clark Griswold Posted May 7, 2015 Posted May 7, 2015 I finally read about the conspiracy theory on this exercise, other than imposing martial law on Texas to pave the way for theft of precious bodily fluids and prepare the population for mass brainwashing, what's the big deal? OPSEC considered, is anybody here going to support this LFE? Ok, Wolverines...
Lensatic Posted May 7, 2015 Posted May 7, 2015 (edited) Y'all might want to sneak on over to my usual hangout for some insight on JH15: https://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=48426 ;) I'm not LS there. LS Edited May 7, 2015 by Lensatic
drewpey Posted May 7, 2015 Posted May 7, 2015 The government is sending SF in to round up all those telling people about our chem trails. nbd.
B52gator Posted May 7, 2015 Posted May 7, 2015 I think it'd be pretty sweet to participate as a civilian ala Robin Sage. I like to think I'd make a good warlord.
Clark Griswold Posted May 8, 2015 Author Posted May 8, 2015 (edited) We're thru the looking glass people... SOF is using abandoned Wal-Marts connected by underground tunnels to allow for a Chinese invasion force to first subdue the southwestern USA then you'll be in a re-education camp with your Chairman Obama book eating rotten rice... /sarcasm... Behold the rant of Alex Jones... https://www.infowars.com/the-truth-about-jade-helm-they-dont-want-you-to-know/ Conspiracy is nothing new to the USA or any other country, in fact it's a helluva lot less here as we have a multitude of press outlets that somewhat balance each other to deliver mostly true but slanted liberal / conservative / corporate or kooky reports and our government is somewhat transparent but becoming byzantine with little direct accountability for obvious malfeasance - Fast & Furious, Clinton e-mails, Lois Lerner. Just listing some of the last few obvious screw ups / cover ups for which no one's cock was put on the chopping block when it was clear that someone needs to be held to account... conservatives have had theirs too... all that typed, that power and no accountability is fueling the recent spike in paranoia, the solution would be for the powerful to hold them selves accountable but I will not hold my breath for that. Edited May 8, 2015 by Clark Griswold
HeloDude Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 Conspiracy is nothing new to the USA or any other country, in fact it's a helluva lot less here as we have a multitude of press outlets that somewhat balance each other to deliver mostly true but slanted liberal / conservative / corporate or kooky reports and our government is somewhat transparent but becoming byzantine with little direct accountability for obvious malfeasance - Fast & Furious, Clinton e-mails, Lois Lerner. Just listing some of the last few obvious screw ups / cover ups for which no one's cock was put on the chopping block when it was clear that someone needs to be held to account... conservatives have had theirs too... all that typed, that power and no accountability is fueling the recent spike in paranoia, the solution would be for the powerful to hold them selves accountable but I will not hold my breath for that. You can always trust the government to tell you the truth...
Clark Griswold Posted May 8, 2015 Author Posted May 8, 2015 You can always trust the government to tell you the truth... Yup https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_syphilis_experiment
HeloDude Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 Yup https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_syphilis_experiment But don't worry...the federal government would never use its great military power to turn on its own citizens...https://www.pbs.org/childofcamp/history/
Clark Griswold Posted May 8, 2015 Author Posted May 8, 2015 (edited) But don't worry...the federal government would never use its great military power to turn on its own citizens...https://www.pbs.org/childofcamp/history/ Yup - trust but verify but never completely trust... the government is just in need of a wholesale purge to reign it in... of course with that comes against the wishes of the army of lobbyists, PACs, Super PACs, corporate donors, billionaires, bullshit non-profit advocacy groups and other purveyors of legal bribery... Edited May 8, 2015 by Clark Griswold
HeloDude Posted May 8, 2015 Posted May 8, 2015 Yup - trust but verify but never completely trust... the government is just in need of a wholesale purge to reign it in... of course with that comes against the wishes of the army of lobbyists, PACs, Super PACs, corporate donors, billionaires, bullshit non-profit advocacy groups and other purveyors of legal bribery... What do you expect when you have a federal government that spends over $3.6 TRILLION in just one year? With that kind of money you're going to have many different groups trying to influence how that money is collected and spent. The problem ultimately isn't the lobbyists, PAC's, etc...it's the legislsting/spending done by our politicians, and their desire to pick winners and losers. And to go even further, the problem stems from the American people for putting these politicians in office. Hell, Hillary is trying to tell future voters that there's too much money in politics, yet she is a key part of that group that loves involving money with politics. In the end, the only legitimate solution will stem from the eventual result of all the spending: Complete economic collapse and then perhaps we can start over.
Clark Griswold Posted May 8, 2015 Author Posted May 8, 2015 (edited) What do you expect when you have a federal government that spends over $3.6 TRILLION in just one year? With that kind of money you're going to have many different groups trying to influence how that money is collected and spent. The problem ultimately isn't the lobbyists, PAC's, etc...it's the legislsting/spending done by our politicians, and their desire to pick winners and losers. And to go even further, the problem stems from the American people for putting these politicians in office. Hell, Hillary is trying to tell future voters that there's too much money in politics, yet she is a key part of that group that loves involving money with politics. In the end, the only legitimate solution will stem from the eventual result of all the spending: Complete economic collapse and then perhaps we can start over. As Willie Sutton was interested in banks because "that's where the money is" all the major actors (good and bad) are hovering around the federal government because of its steady but of late exponential growth... These things usually take years to either gain enough steam to happen or fizzle out but a convention of states to force a constitutional change on the federal government I think it is gathering steam... https://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/01/14/governors-looking-at-constitutional-convention-to-reign-in-federal-spending/ Ultimately the modern state requires a strong central government but not one that is on steroids... Edit: grammar Edited May 8, 2015 by Clark Griswold
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now