Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Current Army C-12 aviator here. Since the demolition of the Air Force FWQ, I'm assuming that on occasion you get some high hour Army fixed wing bubbas and/or prior helo guys in upt. I was just curious if they go through the exact same curriculum/same hours/etc as the regular students (Seems silly that I'd need the full academic curriculum/the full flight hour load if I already had 1000+ hours in a C-12 and 500+ in a Hawk). Also curious how many guys you all see going through UPT above age 30. Thanks! 

Posted

As an instructor in UPT I saw a few dudes pushing 30. Wasn't uncommon and typically their maturity was appreciated. As far as priors, I didn't have any of those helo or Army types in my flight room but someone else may have.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

When I was at CBM there was a class that had an Army Blackhawk pilot turned ANG guy in one of the classes. He had wings, tons of hours, etc etc but still had to go through T-0 all the way to graduation just like every other stud.

I also saw a couple airline pilots who were picking up ANG gigs go through. Same story. Previous flying matters 0 to Big Blue.

They (AETC) don't care what previous experience you have, but your class will definitely appreciate it as long as your not a jackass.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Don't they do interservice transfers in FW? We have prior Army RW and Navy RW pilots in Air Force helps and they went straight to IQT. No UPT required.

Posted (edited)

I know they can waiver for helos only but my interest would be heavies or fighters. I have no idea how they handle prior Army FW pilots as there are very few of us young enough to even entertain a transfer.

Edited by magnus017
Posted

A buddy of mine a few classes behind me at UPT was a Blackhawk guy in the Army. He got picked up to fly Herks with the ANG. All he had to do was T-1s, and he had a completely separate syllabus. This was about 9yrs ago at Vance, so I don't know how things have changed or what his unit did to pull that off.

Posted
10 hours ago, hispeed7721 said:

Previous flying matters 0 to Big Blue.

Actually, previous flying in a different branch of the military does matter to big blue.  

Posted (edited)

I was an IP in the T-6 flight at CBM with the previously mentioned Blackhawk guy.  He had something like 8-9k hrs in blackhawks and regional jets (civilian job), and was headed to a reserve or guard C-130 job.  He didn't have to go to IFS, but he completed the entire SUPT syllabus.  He did very well, as you can imagine, better than the CFI/CFII guys we'd get.  On the HAPL demo I pulled his power in the middle of the MOA and took the radios; he did the rest and could have stuck the landing.  His favorite game was pulling out TERPS regs and playing stump the FAIP.  It was a good time.  

Expect the full SUPT syllabus, which should be a quick read through some AF regs and the Dash-1 for you.  My .02...remain as humble as possible.  You'll look older and have Army wings on your nametag, so no need to establish credentials.  There's the standard harassment games, queep, etc so keep a solid attitude and you'll have a blast.  You'll be learning two new aircraft, so enjoy the opportunity to fly without the combat focus.  It's just pure flying (min queep for the students).  Teach your fellow classmates as much as you can, and share stories.  Most of each class has zero prior active duty experience, so your attitude will establish their expectations.  Enjoy the SRO gig.  

Edited by AwShoot1209
Posted
Actually, previous flying in a different branch of the military does matter to big blue.  

In terms of UPT, that doesn't seem to be the case. Big picture, definitely, but not in reference to his question. I should have been more specific :beer:

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Actually, previous flying in a different branch of the military does matter to big blue.  
In terms of UPT, that doesn't seem to be the case. Big picture, definitely, but not in reference to his question. I should have been more specific :beer:

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There was a prior are me Helo pilot going through when I went through. In the T6 phase he just had to do an abbreviated syllabus then go through the entire T1 syllabus. So his prior experience mattered in that case. I bet if anyone were to check the official training publications for a AETC there would be a prior qual syllabus in there.

Posted

The only one I know of was about 6-9 years ago - prior army helo WO, but crossed into the blue and became a normal active duty 2lt in the AF. The AF didn't care about his prior time, he went through the full UPT syll, and in the end got FAIPed (because he was still a Lt - they won't faip a late rated Capt, because they care about rank/hurting your career, but they don't care about age). He then went on to fly Vipers. I can PM you his contact info if you'd like. 

I'll ask the AETC nerds around here if anything has changed since then. I think the reason the other cases mentioned above are different (abbreviated syllabi, etc) is because of the guard/reserve aspect. If you want to compete for an active duty fighter, you have to compete on the same playing field as every other active duty UPT stud. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted

I think I would most definitely want to do the guard/reserve route, although I'll talk to an active duty rep just to see what the career outlook would be like. Again I'll be 32-33 and it just seems like the reserve/guard would be the most realistic route to take.

Posted
The only one I know of was about 6-9 years ago - prior army helo WO, but crossed into the blue and became a normal active duty 2lt in the AF. The AF didn't care about his prior time, he went through the full UPT syll, and in the end got FAIPed (because he was still a Lt - they won't faip a late rated Capt, because they care about rank/hurting your career, but they don't care about age). He then went on to fly Vipers. I can PM you his contact info if you'd like. 

I'll ask the AETC nerds around here if anything has changed since then. I think the reason the other cases mentioned above are different (abbreviated syllabi, etc) is because of the guard/reserve aspect. If you want to compete for an active duty fighter, you have to compete on the same playing field as every other active duty UPT stud. 

That would have been awesome.

We had a similar guy in a sq I was in. The thing is: rated officer gate months are rated officer gate months; AF has nothing to say about it. So, as. 2Lt, he was getting full 650 flight pay, and before he pinned Capt, he had a star on his wings.

Posted

There isn't currently a syllabus 

7 hours ago, Guardian said:

 

In terms of UPT, that doesn't seem to be the case. Big picture, definitely, but not in reference to his question. I should have been more specific :beer:

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There was a prior are me Helo pilot going through when I went through. In the T6 phase he just had to do an abbreviated syllabus then go through the entire T1 syllabus. So his prior experience mattered in that case. I bet if anyone were to check the official training publications for a AETC there would be a prior qual syllabus in there.

There isn't an abbreviated syllabus anymore for Army rotary guys. They go through UPT. I don't know about a FW qual'd Army though, that's a unique situation.

Posted
There is a "fixed wing QUAL" syllabus specifically for rotor guys going to fixed wing. 

While I do think there is merit for a different syllabus, if what you say is true it's not being recognized or implemented by all UPT bases/squadrons

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • 1 year later...
Posted

Thread defibrillator: ON

 

Anyone know how they are dealing with USMC/USN (Joint FW trained) Rotor guys now-a-days without FWQ? I'm a Cobra driver sorting out this blue nonsense. I know the Q was designed for Army dudes since they didn't have a credited FW primary....

 

Someone mentioned intercepting in the D/E/F course?

From the old MASL:

F-V5A-R-F U 17w VAR 80R 2 2 No T-38 TRANSITION (F CRS)

Course Description:

Provides jet currency training in the T-38 where required for subsequent Air Force formal course flying training. Category A is approximately 3 training days. Catagory B is approximately 6 training days. Category C is approximately 21 training days. Category D is approximately 22 training days. Category E is aprroximately 45 training days. 

 

Any insight?

Posted

Were you a Cobra dude the whole time or some time in Hornets or anything? If no FW time, expect a full syllabus if transitioning to jets.

Posted

It was a hundred years ago but in my UPT class we had a former warrant officer who flew Cobras, had 3,000+ hours and he still had to do the full UPT syllabus.  He did well #7/26.

Posted
It was a hundred years ago but in my UPT class we had a former warrant officer who flew Cobras, had 3,000+ hours and he still had to do the full UPT syllabus.  He did well #7/26.

#7/26 SPs? That's a second tier strat. The best guys in the class probably got strat'd as Lts. Based on my estimate, he was probably actually bottom third with a weak flight duty position strat like that!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Danger41 said:

Were you a Cobra dude the whole time or some time in Hornets or anything? If no FW time, expect a full syllabus if transitioning to jets.

 

Thanks!

The SuperCobra was the only gray bird I flew. I completed joint primary (think the af calls it Phase 2) in the T-34C. We had a bunch of AF dudes in the class and a bunch of bros went to Vance for exchange. We do it differently in creating FW qualified dudes first, then branch off to rotors, cargo, strike etc... that training satisfied FAA single engine commercial/ instrument requirements. In their terminology, I am fixed wing- qualified. According the AFI- I'd rate silver wings (if I went rotors) or upon completion of a FW jet transition course for fighters. 

 

Army cobra/c-12 etc is completely different. The AF does not recognize  ANY of your flight phases for equivalency training, which sucks. 

 

1st image: AFI blue wing requirements 

2nd image: ARB request statement

IMG_2699.PNG

IMG_2700.PNG

Edited by boxster02
Adding more

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...