FUSEPLUG Posted September 2, 2016 Posted September 2, 2016 1 hour ago, hispeed7721 said: Landing in the wrong place will do that I guess Props to the guys who pulled off the landing at Peter O. Night - they had little to do with our risk aversion. It's the "Q3 for landing 1 knot out of NVG ALZ crosswind limits then self-identifying for an honest mistake" that has castrated the C-17 community. When solid squadron leadership is continuously squashed by a clueless, self-absorbed OG - that's when a community curls up into giant "risk adverse" ball. 1
pawnman Posted September 2, 2016 Posted September 2, 2016 On 8/28/2016 at 0:36 PM, FUSEPLUG said: Correct. Though the McGuire guys might do it with less if they're tired enough. It never gets old. 1
nunya Posted September 2, 2016 Posted September 2, 2016 11 hours ago, HuggyU2 said: The airport is KREI and is at 1600' MSL. I'm guessing the largest aircraft they could handle would be a C-130, just based on the limited parking. That's probably a stretch too. The M-28, U-28, T-6, and C-12 would be a hit. I see only a single wheel weight of 12.5K in the FAA AFD. So unless the ASRR lists a 2S weight, a C-130 is probably out anyway.
tac airlifter Posted September 2, 2016 Posted September 2, 2016 I've taken PC-12s there and through the whole area: AVX, L05, L26, L35, CN37.... The only issue is ascertaining taxiway quality at those smaller fields. We need 23' width which is easy to find, but locations that don't see aircraft the size of a PC-12 will sometimes have significant erosion and grass growth on the edges, and that can be problematic. I don't know about an M-28 at REI; looks like single wheel is limited to 12.5 and I have no idea what GW they operate at.
Fuzz Posted September 2, 2016 Posted September 2, 2016 7 hours ago, FUSEPLUG said: Props to the guys who pulled off the landing at Peter O. Night - they had little to do with our risk aversion. It's the "Q3 for landing 1 knot out of NVG ALZ crosswind limits then self-identifying for an honest mistake" that has castrated the C-17 community. When solid squadron leadership is continuously squashed by a clueless, self-absorbed OG - that's when a community curls up into giant "risk adverse" ball. Wasn't this the NVG Training wind limits not the actual NVG or ALZ wind limits?
HuggyU2 Posted September 2, 2016 Author Posted September 2, 2016 (edited) Good info again. I'll speak to the airport manager and see what the story is. In any case, the Airshow is sponsored by an excellent craft brewery, and ends with a concert. Last year, Everclear headlined. Good static warbird turnout, including one of only 3 flying P-63s and one of only 7 flying P-38s. Edited September 3, 2016 by HuggyU2
LookieRookie Posted September 2, 2016 Posted September 2, 2016 FYI, the T-6 will need to work an OG waiver as well due to non-towered airfield ops.
YoungnDumb Posted September 4, 2016 Posted September 4, 2016 On 9/2/2016 at 5:54 PM, LookieRookie said: FYI, the T-6 will need to work an OG waiver as well due to non-towered airfield ops. Easy enough to get
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now