Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, pawnman said:

I wonder how many people in Trump's circle have to say it before Trump supporters believe it.

Barr will probably just be the next one in the administration to get canned like the last trump nominee who said the election was generally secure. You know.. as part of the completely normal administration turnover. 

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, pawnman said:

I wonder how many people in Trump's circle have to say it before Trump supporters believe it.

No reason to disbelieve Barr. Headline is misleading though, left out the "so far" part. The flipside to this is the Dems and MSM have been calling him Trumps personal hack lawyer for well over a year. Now that he said something they can grab on to, he's got credibility?  Politics as usual. 

Posted
9 hours ago, arg said:

No reason to disbelieve Barr. Headline is misleading though, left out the "so far" part. The flipside to this is the Dems and MSM have been calling him Trumps personal hack lawyer for well over a year. Now that he said something they can grab on to, he's got credibility?  Politics as usual. 

Are you joking?  He doesn't have any credibility, he simply demonstrates how everyone but Trump gets it...

Posted

You know, you can still be a Trump supporter while also realizing he lost the election due to being very unpopular.

But at some point, you’ll have to let it go. Trump himself will be working “the election was rigged” quibbles into every conversation he has for the rest of his life. Don’t lump yourself into that boat.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 5
Posted
19 hours ago, torqued said:

You want a math problem? 😆

What is 300,000 COVID deaths minus 200,000 COVID deaths? Think you can wrap your head around that one, Capt Calculator?

I think you thought this was me lol. By the way, on the order of magnitude means something.

You're kinda goin off the rails, man.

  • Like 1
Posted
37 minutes ago, Negatory said:

I think you thought this was me lol. By the way, on the order of magnitude means something.

You're kinda goin off the rails, man.

Ah, shit. LOL. My fault. I got you and DosXX confused. You have the same positions. DosXX, my apologies. Negatory, I meant to insult you with that post. 😆

And I agree. These issues are somewhat important to me, but not enough to make permanent online enemies. I don’t want to go any further down that path. We’re only disagreeing on one or two issues. We’re not solving anything here.  I’m going to try and keep that in perspective.

  • Upvote 3
Posted (edited)

So, this had to be a thing - https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/12/01/no-kraken-refer-military-intelligence-unit.hmtl

Quote

A retired Air Force three-star general reignited baseless conspiratorial claims about U.S. troops' involvement in clandestine missions in the wake of the presidential election -- claims an Army official said are 100% false.

Also, Flynn (whose twitter handle is @genflynn...douche) is endorsing:

Quote

...declare a limited form of Martial Law, and temporarily suspend the Constitution and civilian control of these federal elections, for the sole purpose of having the military oversee a national re-vote.

So...yea.

Edited by 17D_guy
Posted
2 hours ago, 17D_guy said:

Come get your man
 

 

are we playing conspiracy theory bingo?  I'm at 10 minutes in and I've got a blackout card

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 12/2/2020 at 12:16 AM, arg said:

No reason to disbelieve Barr. Headline is misleading though, left out the "so far" part. The flipside to this is the Dems and MSM have been calling him Trumps personal hack lawyer for well over a year. Now that he said something they can grab on to, he's got credibility?  Politics as usual. 

I feel like I could argue the other way.  Barr was hand-picked by the president and has been a loyal supporter...but now that he says there was no fraud, that goodwill has vaporized among Trump supporters.

To me, the fact that the left hated him so much lends MORE credibility to the argument.  It clearly isn't just a partisan statement.

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, pawnman said:

I feel like I could argue the other way.  Barr was hand-picked by the president and has been a loyal supporter...but now that he says there was no fraud, that goodwill has vaporized among Trump supporters.

To me, the fact that the left hated him so much lends MORE credibility to the argument.  It clearly isn't just a partisan statement.

Barr is nothing but a loyal Trump puppet. The fact he started looking at election fraud before some states certified a winner says a lot.

Expect to have him, via the OLC, come out with an legal opinion, once Trump pardons himself, of how “this situation is different” to the Nixon pardoning.

One of best parts of Biden winning is that Barr, as well as that idiot that runs the FCC Pai, who shit canned net neutrality, will be booted out of office.

 

Edited by Sua Sponte
  • Upvote 1
Posted

A nonpartisan documentary shedding light on election security vulnerabilities is not the same as partisan hacks conveniently showing spotty evidence as "PROOF" of fraud in specific battleground states following an election defeat with the intent of undermining the credibility of said outcome.

 

  • Upvote 2
Posted
2 hours ago, jrizzell said:

This is a really thought provoking documentary on the ease with which election votes can be manipulated. It’s from that right wing conspiracy channel...HBO
https://www.hbo.com/documentaries/kill-chain-the-cyber-war-on-americas-elections

"the ease" is the questionable part.  Which adversary has the infrastructure, capabilities, and means to get this accomplished without anyone competent bringing it forward?

Pres Trump has now stated Biden can't be Pres if the votes weren't legit...if it was hacked, why would he not push that forward with evidence from any national security agency?

Posted
12 minutes ago, slackline said:

https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/04/politics/trump-nominee-pentagon-martial-law/index.html

 

Scott O'Grady didn't come off as a tinfoil-hat kinda guy when I met him, but this is sad.

He's coaching a narrative. This is about broad power manipulation. All of the last 3 Presidents began their first term with narratives that denigrated their legitimacy. Obama had birthers, Trump had Russia conspiracy theorist, and now Biden will have vote manipulation. This is the new washington power play to keep your ideaology offensive even when you aren't in power. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
8 hours ago, pcola said:


This statement is shocking. And I’m not surprised that I haven’t seen it reported once in any of the liberal “news” coverage of that interview this morning. What a joke.


Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app

We can have Trump saying crazy shit for years...but now every word is gospel.  K.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...