tac airlifter Posted October 12, 2024 Posted October 12, 2024 11 hours ago, disgruntledemployee said: I think Trump had a stroke. "Reminded me of the Biden circles that he used to have, right? He’d have eight circles and he couldn’t fill ’em up. But then I heard he beat us with the popular vote. I don’t know. I don’t know. Couldn’t fill up the eight circles. I always loved those circles. They were so beautiful. They were so beautiful to look at. In fact, the person that did them, that was the best thing about his, the level of that circle was great. But they couldn’t get people, so they used to have the press stand in those circles because they couldn’t get the people. " https://www.mediaite.com/trump/trump-spews-incomprehensible-stream-of-consciousness-the-level-of-that-circle-was-great/ PS. That's some Elmer Fudd right there. Pretty rich to read media articles about an “incomprehensible” Trump when Biden is obviously lost to dementia. 1
disgruntledemployee Posted October 12, 2024 Author Posted October 12, 2024 2 hours ago, tac airlifter said: Pretty rich to read media articles about an “incomprehensible” Trump when Biden is obviously lost to dementia. And your opinion on Trump's rambling is what? Because that was the topic.
Lord Ratner Posted October 12, 2024 Posted October 12, 2024 5 hours ago, disgruntledemployee said: And your opinion on Trump's rambling is what? Because that was the topic. He's old and probably losing his marbles. I too am ok with a President Vance.
ClearedHot Posted October 12, 2024 Posted October 12, 2024 30 minutes ago, Lord Ratner said: He's old and probably losing his marbles. I too am ok with a President Vance. Far more capable than Waltz...I really wish Trump had picked Haley. Policy wise she is more centrist, she could easily be POTUS tomorrow and vote wise she appeals to a broader base...IMHO this election would be a runaway win for Trump at this point.
Lawman Posted October 12, 2024 Posted October 12, 2024 Far more capable than Waltz...I really wish Trump had picked Haley. Policy wise she is more centrist, she could easily be POTUS tomorrow and vote wise she appeals to a broader base...IMHO this election would be a runaway win for Trump at this point. I think there is a calculus to that where she’s playing for 2028.Whether Trump wins or loses this election anybody linked directly to his campaign or an administration will carry that into a campaign probably for a lot of negatives. If Kamala does win this out, and runs for reelection as would be expected, Haley becomes the perfect counter for the Republican Party to rally behind.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
tac airlifter Posted October 12, 2024 Posted October 12, 2024 6 hours ago, disgruntledemployee said: And your opinion on Trump's rambling is what? Because that was the topic. 1 hour ago, Lord Ratner said: He's old and probably losing his marbles. I too am ok with a President Vance. What LR said. I don't think Trump is even close to Biden yet, but it comes for everybody. And after watching the TDS folks (you) ignore Biden's obvious dementia for years, I find it silly to hear this scrutiny now. Also, 99 out of 100 times Trump is more articulate than Kamala so the democrats have no credibility on the subject. I'm voting Trump but I'm excited for a future that does not involve extremely old people clinging to power until they die. 3 2
brabus Posted October 12, 2024 Posted October 12, 2024 (edited) 1 hour ago, ClearedHot said: Far more capable than Waltz...I really wish Trump had picked Haley. Policy wise she is more centrist, she could easily be POTUS tomorrow and vote wise she appeals to a broader base...IMHO this election would be a runaway win for Trump at this point. She’s way better than the Dem’s current options, but she is an establishment politician through and through - a lot of people, myself included, do not like that. Edited October 12, 2024 by brabus 1 1
BashiChuni Posted October 12, 2024 Posted October 12, 2024 (edited) 8 hours ago, disgruntledemployee said: And your opinion on Trump's rambling is what? Because that was the topic. trump always rambles and goes down rabbit holes during speeches. but like TAC says very RICH coming from you guys who denied bidens mental acuity for three years. also trump will go on ANY show and be interviewed. he's the AFSOC of politicians lol (anytime, place, anywhere). kamala on the other hand is MASSIVELY protected by the media. if the media wasn't using kid gloves with her you'd see how empty she is. (reference heavily edited 60 minutes interview) there is nothing of substance she says. it's all word salad nonsense. plus shes a marxist so there's that. Edited October 12, 2024 by BashiChuni 1 3
disgruntledemployee Posted October 12, 2024 Author Posted October 12, 2024 (edited) Ugh, here we go again, again, uh, make it 5 or 6 times now. Below is the 1st time I said Biden had dementia. That's page 252, Aug 2021, which was OVER 3 YEARS AGO. On 8/30/2021 at 11:17 AM, disgruntledemployee said: Desantis is a bully (my opinion) and I despise bullies. And the next President should be under 60yo. Biden is done. 1. He is incompetent and I'm being kind with my words right now; probably well into dementia. He will get heavier and heavier to prop up. Any decision he makes is dangerous because he lacks the mental ability to make them. 2. The fucked up AFG exit will stick to him and his administration forever. There isn't a story or image available to paint a better picture. From people falling off the C-17 on takeoff, to the picture of the Marine holding a baby that was then killed in the Kabul attack, to the story of former operators going in on their own to rescue people they worked with and promised a better life, this complete and utterly inept group must go. Every time I see Bidens picture ...... When he said he will make them pay in regards to the Kabul attacks, he should include himself. 3. No leader of any country, organization, company, or political entity will, nor should they, ever trust Biden and his inept administration ever again. He is completely ineffective. Zero influence, or more accurately, zero positive and most likely just negative influence. Out 9 hours ago, tac airlifter said: What LR said. I don't think Trump is even close to Biden yet, but it comes for everybody. And after watching the TDS folks (you) ignore Biden's obvious dementia for years, I find it silly to hear this scrutiny now. Also, 99 out of 100 times Trump is more articulate than Kamala so the democrats have no credibility on the subject. I'm voting Trump but I'm excited for a future that does not involve extremely old people clinging to power until they die. Your last comment, that's absolutely, solid gold irony right there. I guess Trump isn't old enough or trying hard enough to regain power. And when you say excited, do you mean like Buddy finding out Santa is coming, kind of excited? Or Eeyore kind of excited. Edited October 12, 2024 by disgruntledemployee I'm not voting for Harris either, so there!
tac airlifter Posted October 13, 2024 Posted October 13, 2024 (edited) 3 hours ago, disgruntledemployee said: Your last comment, that's absolutely, solid gold irony right there. I guess Trump isn't old enough or trying hard enough to regain power. And when you say excited, do you mean like Buddy finding out Santa is coming, kind of excited? Or Eeyore kind of excited. You misunderstand me, my last comment absolutely applies to Trump. Watching 80 YOs of any political affiliation act this way is not good, and I’m hopeful this is the last iteration of old people fighting that I see for POTUS. and valid quote, I didn’t know your thoughts on Biden and I humbly retract my snarky comment. You do have TDS though. Edited October 13, 2024 by tac airlifter 1 2
HeloDude Posted October 15, 2024 Posted October 15, 2024 (edited) Well, just three weeks out and I’d say it’s a toss-up to slight lean for Trump. Kamala is going to do an interview with Brett Baier on Fox…if she was winning then I doubt she would be taking this unnecessary risk. At this point I won’t be shocked if either one wins. ETA: It won’t be “live” but according to Brett it will be unedited with no commercials Edited October 15, 2024 by HeloDude 1
Lord Ratner Posted October 15, 2024 Posted October 15, 2024 52 minutes ago, HeloDude said: Well, just three weeks out and I’d say it’s a toss-up to slight lean for Trump. Kamala is going to do an interview with Brett Baier on Fox…if she was winning then I doubt she would be taking this unnecessary risk. At this point I won’t be shocked if either one wins. ETA: It won’t be “live” but according to Brett it will be unedited with no commercials The Democrats are absolutely terrified that the polls still skew in favor of Democrats, as they have for the last couple election cycles. If that's the case, Trump has it in a landslide (by modern standards, not like Reagan). 1
uhhello Posted October 15, 2024 Posted October 15, 2024 She's apparently rumored to be on Rogan too. Doubt that will happen as he won't allow edits.
HeloDude Posted October 15, 2024 Posted October 15, 2024 1 hour ago, Lord Ratner said: The Democrats are absolutely terrified that the polls still skew in favor of Democrats, as they have for the last couple election cycles. If that's the case, Trump has it in a landslide (by modern standards, not like Reagan). I’m pretty confident that both campaigns have internal polls that tell them how they’re doing…so when Trump says he won’t do another debate and Kamala says she’ll do an interview on Fox, I think that’s both very telling. 2
brabus Posted October 15, 2024 Posted October 15, 2024 (edited) 2 hours ago, Lord Ratner said: The Democrats are absolutely terrified that the polls still skew in favor of Democrats, as they have for the last couple election cycles. If that's the case, Trump has it in a landslide (by modern standards, not like Reagan). An observation amongst people I know is conservatives actively avoid pollsters and liberals do not. Obviously that’s not 100% applicable across all voters, but it is interesting when you look at polls with that observation in mind. Edited October 15, 2024 by brabus
BFM this Posted October 15, 2024 Posted October 15, 2024 3 hours ago, uhhello said: She's apparently rumored to be on Rogan too. Doubt that will happen as he won't allow edits. There’s a bunch of rules her team would insist on that JR would laugh at. 1
Day Man Posted October 16, 2024 Posted October 16, 2024 On 10/12/2024 at 8:08 AM, BashiChuni said: trump always rambles and goes down rabbit holes during speeches. or just stands there for 30 min listening to the ViIlage People and Sinead O'Connor 😂
herkbier Posted October 16, 2024 Posted October 16, 2024 Can they both lose? Or is the only option on the table: we all lose?
dream big Posted October 16, 2024 Posted October 16, 2024 9 minutes ago, herkbier said: Can they both lose? Or is the only option on the table: we all lose? These were valid options during the primary. Trump legitimately won his though. 3 3
SpeedOfHeat Posted October 16, 2024 Posted October 16, 2024 All the talk of winning vs. losing is hilarious. <<Spoiler alert>> If Trump wins, he and his supporters will say he won and the election was free and fair. If he loses, he will absolutely say it was rigged/stolen/fixed, again. He has now laid the "it's rigged" groundwork ahead of three consecutive election cycles. 8 years of this bull$hit. And yet the MAGA fans (pictured in the coonskin hat below) still can't figure out the obvious: that it's just a guy with the world's most frail and vulnerable ego. A sore loser, plain and simple.
BashiChuni Posted October 16, 2024 Posted October 16, 2024 (edited) 28 minutes ago, SpeedOfHeat said: All the talk of winning vs. losing is hilarious. <<Spoiler alert>> If Trump wins, he and his supporters will say he won and the election was free and fair. If he loses, he will absolutely say it was rigged/stolen/fixed, again. He has now laid the "it's rigged" groundwork ahead of three consecutive election cycles. 8 years of this bull$hit. And yet the MAGA fans (pictured in the coonskin hat below) still can't figure out the obvious: that it's just a guy with the world's most frail and vulnerable ego. A sore loser, plain and simple. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/aug/21/stolen-rigged-and-illegitimate-democrats-long-hist/ "Democrats such as Hillary Clinton, Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams and dozens of congressional lawmakers have long objected to state and federal election results and have attempted to block every Republican presidential winner since 2000." "“I believe he knows he’s an illegitimate president,” Mrs. Clinton told CBS News in September 2019." Edited October 16, 2024 by BashiChuni 1 2
SpeedOfHeat Posted October 16, 2024 Posted October 16, 2024 13 minutes ago, BashiChuni said: "Democrats such as Hillary Clinton, Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams and dozens of congressional lawmakers have long objected to state and federal election results and have attempted to block every Republican presidential winner since 2000." "“I believe he knows he’s an illegitimate president,” Mrs. Clinton told CBS News in September 2019." Yup, and shame on them. Shame on candidates that lose and refuse to concede, that undermine confidence in our elections, and that call into question the legitimacy of the winner, simply to safeguard their bruised ego. Shame on them, and especially so without any credible and/or compelling evidence of outcome-determinant fraud or suppression. Ok, now your turn…… 1
skybert Posted October 16, 2024 Posted October 16, 2024 NOOooooo! That’s entirely different!!! Because…….well because it is!!
Lord Ratner Posted October 16, 2024 Posted October 16, 2024 2 hours ago, skybert said: NOOooooo! That’s entirely different!!! Because…….well because it is!! Nothing different about it. The American people, regardless of party, no longer trust "experts." They still trust *their* experts, but that's human nature. It's just a broader loss of faith in the institutions, which is warranted because the leaders of those institutions decided a while ago that the purpose of the institution was to further an ideological goal, instead of just doing-the-thing (collect taxes, prosecute crime, administrate education programs, preserve public land, research and defend against disease, etc). That's why Republicans have been (until Trump) weak on immigration despite the contradiction with rule-of-law, because they wanted to further a flawed view of unfettered capitalism. And Democrats have supported the greatest absurdities of affirmative action despite the contradiction with equality and colorblindness, because they wanted to further a flawed view of utopian equity. Trump and Bernie are the voters' anguished response to the liars leading the government, espousing values they do not uphold in their own lives or in the way they steer their organizations. Bernie just failed to stay true to his values (thank God), so he lost to the Democratic machine. Trump did not. Both are insane, but these are insane times🤷🏻♂️ 4
disgruntledemployee Posted October 16, 2024 Author Posted October 16, 2024 15 hours ago, Day Man said: or just stands there for 30 min listening to the ViIlage People and Sinead O'Connor 😂 Trump is a pretty big Air Dicker too. https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/1eplj7u/judd_apatow_on_trump/?rdt=62082
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now