The Next President is...

[disgruntledemployee]

1 hour ago, ClearedHot said:

If he said it...so many claims like this have been proven to be false but that never gets press. 

Instead you choose to believe in Russian collusion.  Bullshit

You believe the dossier was real and the is was not only fake, it was paid for by Hillary.  Fucking Bullshit

You choose to believe the laptop was fake.  Dumb Ass Bullshit

You choose to believe the Biden had no part in the prosecution when yesterday it was revealed Fani's boyfriend who was working on the case had MULTIPLE meetings at the White House.  Stupid Bullshit

You choose to believe Biden today when he hand-waived his previous comments about "Lock Him Up"...he meant politically.  You're up to your ears in Bullshit

In short, you choose to believe the radical democrats who will stop at nothing (including suppressing the 1st amendment), to remain in power.  In short, a shit ton of, yep... Bullshit.

 

Now that we're passed all the bullshit, my question still remains.  Want to try an answer?

1 hour ago, HeloDude said:

Show me the proof…unless you always believe when person X says person Y said something bad.

The link to the article by the reporter that reported it from named sources.  Now try answering the question.

[HeloDude]

8 minutes ago, disgruntledemployee said:

The link to the article by the reporter that reported it from named sources.  Now try answering the question.

Saying someone said something isn’t proof…so what question is there to answer?

[ClearedHot]

2 hours ago, disgruntledemployee said:

Now that we're passed all the bullshit, my question still remains.  Want to try an answer?

The link to the article by the reporter that reported it from named sources.  Now try answering the question.

Someone's vagina is extra sandy today.

[brabus]

6 hours ago, disgruntledemployee said:

One day he might say or do the one thing for you to finally turn away and say, fuck him.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/10/trump-military-generals-hitler/680327/

Been completely debunked already - once again the Atlantic published a bullshit hit piece, based completely on lies, and apparently you bought hook, line, and sinker. Stop being so gullible and believing this shit. I know you want it to be true because it supports your opinion, but alas it is complete horeshit, like a vast majority of everything else rags like the Atlantic publish.

Edited October 24, 2024 by brabus

[Smokin]

A named source that is making a personal financial profit from making claims like this.  A guy that served on Trump's staff but didn't resign in protest despite apparently thinking that Trump is a fascist.  Real trustworthy source.  I'd trust something that guy says slightly less than a rumor my first grader brings home from the playground.

[disgruntledemployee]

[disgruntledemployee]

2 hours ago, ClearedHot said:

Someone's vagina is extra sandy today.

You started it with your personal attack by making up shit that you think I said.  I merely asked the question, what else does Trump have to do to lose your (question to BODNers at large) support.  Apparently, he hasn't disparaged the military person important in your life.  So go ahead and post your memes sonny and continue to play ignorance to the dishonorable Trump.

[ClearedHot]

46 minutes ago, disgruntledemployee said:

You started it with your personal attack by making up shit that you think I said.  I merely asked the question, what else does Trump have to do to lose your (question to BODNers at large) support.  Apparently, he hasn't disparaged the military person important in your life.  So go ahead and post your memes sonny and continue to play ignorance to the dishonorable Trump.

Sonny?  Why thanks Pappy, great to see you in full blown triggered mode. 

[Boomer6]

[brabus]

Dammit Boomer, you just cost me 6.9 oz of beer that just came flying out of my mouth!

[brabus]

2 hours ago, disgruntledemployee said:

Apparently, he hasn't disparaged the military person important in your life.

You are so full of TDS you can’t even process a very simple, straight forward message. Case in point you posted the video of the MOF vs. MOH comparison video thinking, “ha, this shows Trump doesn’t like the mil!” But, he’s clearly stating how it’s better to be giving a medal to a healthy person vs. giving a MOH out typically means the recipient is either dead or injured, which is sad and not something he wishes to have to do because it inevitably means the worse for someone and/or their family. 

You don’t have to like Trump, but you are wildly biased and have abdicated all of your opinions to the media and leftist pundits while shitcanning any shred of critical thinking skill. Don’t like Trump’s policies, ok cool tell us about it. Keep repeating absolutely ridiculous, brain dead drivel that is wildly wrong and you’ll be taken at face value as an idiot.

 

[herkbum]

Sonny?  Why thanks Pappy, great to see you in full blown triggered mode. 

Didn’t you retire like 10 or so years ago young man?! I’m old and I think you have me beat by a couple years.


Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app

[Swizzle]

13 hours ago, SpeedOfHeat said:

Yes, let’s snicker and roll our eyes at the Air Force vet and current Marine out shooting.

Meanwhile, Trump cannot even legally purchase or own a firearm.  lol.

Who cares when you have permanent, life-long, armed personal protection from U.S. Secret Service via Former President's Protection Act of 2012? That's better than non-sharpshooting, triggerhappy USAF SF or USA MP gateguards...probably most of the time...save places like Putler, Bennsylvania.

https://www.secretservice.gov/about/faq/general

"By law, the Secret Service is authorized to protect:

Former presidents, their spouses, except when the spouse re-marries"

[O Face]

14 hours ago, SpeedOfHeat said:

Yes, let’s snicker and roll our eyes at the Air Force vet and current Marine out shooting.

Meanwhile, Trump cannot even legally purchase or own a firearm.  lol.

You should swing by The Congressman is Back thread. We’ve been savagely mocking that Air Force vet for years. Way worse than snickering and eye rolls. 

[ClearedHot]

6 hours ago, herkbum said:

Didn’t you retire like 10 or so years ago young man?! I’m old and I think you have me beat by a couple years.

8 Years...crazy to think how quickly it has gone.  Make the most of every day...retiring again (and for good), in March, unless Kamala wins and taxes unrealized capital gains. 

[ClearedHot]

First the Teamsters Union refused to endorse Kamala now this...

Meltdown at the LA Times: Billionaire Owner Denies Vetoing Presidential Endorsement, Top Editor Resigns

[Vito]

Reading some of of these TDS POSTS,  I have to ask, When did the Air Force start allowing Beta’s to go to pilot training. 

[Buenos Diaz]

1 hour ago, ClearedHot said:

8 Years...crazy to think how quickly it has gone.  Make the most of every day...retiring again (and for good), in March, unless Kamala wins and taxes unrealized capital gains. 

ClearedHot,

     I didn’t realize you were worth more than $100,000,000.  You’ve done very well in the last eight years.  
       Correct me if I’m wrong but the proposal on taxing unrealized gains only applies to those worth over $100 million.  I’m not sure I agree with taxing unrealized gains in any form but this proposal doesn’t apply to very many.

 

Buenos

[ClearedHot]

6 minutes ago, Buenos Diaz said:

ClearedHot,

     I didn’t realize you were worth more than $100,000,000.  You’ve done very well in the last eight years.  
       Correct me if I’m wrong but the proposal on taxing unrealized gains only applies to those worth over $100 million.  I’m not sure I agree with taxing unrealized gains in any form but this proposal doesn’t apply to very many.

 

Buenos

Buenos,

I am not worth $100M...yet, but to think this plan will only impact the 11,000 or so people in this category is a fallacy.  The negative implications of this policy will have a huge impact on the market and our economy regardless of your net worth.

There are of course varying assessments but some of the ripple effects are outlined here.

[BFM this]

lol, I'm several orders of magnitude off that net worth figure, but even I know that my wallet is well within the WEZ of that dumb-fuck idea.

But hey, unsustainable spending isn't going to sustain itself ya know!

[SurelySerious]

lol, I'm several orders of magnitude off that net worth figure, but even I know that my wallet is well within the WEZ of that dumb- idea.
But hey, unsustainable spending isn't going to sustain itself ya know!

Even at the current scope, it could fundamentally alter investment and capital strategies that punish the economy and common citizens. In addition to the potential scope expansion to the rest of us.

[SpeedOfHeat]

Trump supporters only have 4 fallback responses to every single post:

1)        “TDS”

2)        “Fake news”

3)        Whataboutism

4)        Some version of the “lesser of 2 evils” argument

Every response fits one of those categories.  

It’s true that the John Kelly quotes are secondhand.  Believe him or not, it doesn’t matter.  Personally, I ask which is more likely:  That Kelly had a distinguished 46-yr career in the Marines, became Head of Homeland Security, was hired as WH Chief of Staff, and then all-of-a-sudden, decided to become a liar and traitor?  OR…..that Trump is simply a shitty person and an idiot?

But again, it doesn’t matter.  You can dismiss the quotes as unverifiable.  What’s not in question is the long list of people, in addition to Kelly, that all echo his comments.  Pence, Mattis, Milley, Bolton, Tillerson, Barr, Esper, etc.  Even Trump’s current VP pick was a Never Trump’er who called him an idiot.  Again, what is more likely?  All those guys are lying?  Gen Maddog Mattis, (revered among Marines....like a living Robin Olds for us......) suddenly got a case of “TDS?”  OR…..could it be…..wait for it……that Trump is a shitty person and an idiot?

People are acting like Trump’s second term will be the same as his first.  I hear that all the time.  If they’re referencing the end, when he lost, they’re spot-on.  If he loses, it will be nearly identical.  You’re already seeing unfounded claims of voter fraud and building hysteria that “tHe fIX Is iN.”  …..Strange how the “Stop the Steal” folks had 4 years to figure out how to stop the steal again, and apparently couldn’t do a thing to foil the democratic pentaverate’s evil plan.  Weird.  But I digress…

If he wins, however, it will be much different.  In his first term, people took comfort in having the “adults in the room."  But imagine how different the next administration would look.  It’s not 2017 or 2018 anymore.  Everyone knows the rules of the Trump game now:  Unquestioning loyalty and bootlicking, or you’re fired.  That’s it.

Put on the red MAGA hat and smile and feed into his ego ......or pack your $hit.  No sane person of dignity, conviction, or genuine motives will be around him.  And worse still, people looking to exploit the US and/or take advantage of Trump know exactly how to do it:  Praise and flattery and adoration.  Compliment him, especially about petty nonsense like crowd size or his golf game. 

Someone asked about Beta males.  Ha.  The joke’s on you.  You’re about to vote for the biggest Beta ever.

[HeloDude]

I agree, Trump will actually fire people for poor performance, unlike Biden.

[SpeedOfHeat]

2 hours ago, HeloDude said:

I agree, Trump will actually fire people for poor performance, unlike Biden.

....right on cue, response #3, whataboutism.  lol

Also right on cue, for you specifically, missing the point.  Unless by "poor performance," you meant they displayed disloyalty.  Because that's why he fires people.  Kiss the ring, or kiss your job goodbye.

What senior cabinet official got fired for actual legit "poor performance."  Can you name one, with examples?

He had more turnover in his senior administration than any other in the past 40+ years.  Most firings were done predictably via tweet, calling people things like "dumb as a rock," "a loser," and "a gutless pig."  Gen Mattis resigned and gave 2 months notice, and Trump later turned around and claimed he fired him, calling him "overrated."

And all the while, the glaring contradiction:  Trump campaigned that he would hire "only the best people."  He knows the "best people.  Tremendous people.  Great, strong people."  Yeah, ...sure.   Upon announcing his nominees and/or at their swearing-in, he showered them with praise and cited how smart they were.  They were going to "drain the swamp."  ........blah, blah, derp derp. 

....Then, he fires them "like dogs" and calls them stupid losers.   This same pattern repeated over a dozen times.  How do you explain that?  ....Or, should I just try to guess now which one of the 4 standard responses you'll use to avoid answering the question? 

He's recycled the same exact promise about hiring in this campaign.  .....Who could possibly still buy this obvious bullshit?  

The one's around him next time will be his kids (minus Ivanka and Jared -- sounds like they had enough the first time around), and psychos like MTG, Laura Loomer, Tucker, Keri Lake, and Lauren Boebert.

Edited October 24, 2024 by SpeedOfHeat

[Boomer6]

IDK about the rest of you guys, but I believe the longer someone is in the military, or rather the higher rank they achieve, the more likely their actions are motivated by politics and self interest. If an individual transitions into the political arena post service then, for me, all bets are off on their trustworthiness, regardless of service or branch.

That's why I have no problem withholding condemnation for a politician because another politician claims they said X,Y,Z. It's the same reason I'm not losing my mind over what some retard on fox news claims Kamala said. 

Pics/Video or it didn't happen.