uhhello Posted yesterday at 04:04 AM Posted yesterday at 04:04 AM This is real life. Grab a beer or three and listen to whole thing.
disgruntledemployee Posted yesterday at 04:18 AM Author Posted yesterday at 04:18 AM G-men that were doing their jobs as directed by their bosses get fired. I smell a fat lawsuit. https://www.mediaite.com/news/fbi-agents-involved-in-trump-cases-escorted-out-of-offices-in-friday-night-purge/ "Trump denied Friday afternoon during an Oval Office press conference that he ordered the firings." I call bullshit. 1
brabus Posted yesterday at 04:46 AM Posted yesterday at 04:46 AM (edited) I trust the FBI about as much as the CCP at this point. But, I suppose it depends on the official reason they were fired (not just whatever single quote was printed in a news article). Could be bullshit/lawsuit city, but may not be. Also, we’re they truly fired, or just reassigned to BFE Field Office, ND and quit? Edited yesterday at 04:47 AM by brabus 1
arg Posted yesterday at 05:35 AM Posted yesterday at 05:35 AM 1 hour ago, disgruntledemployee said: .... that were doing their jobs as directed by their bosses ...... Have you seen that anywhere else? 3
17D_guy Posted yesterday at 06:15 AM Posted yesterday at 06:15 AM So... About those tariffs and retaliatory tariffs.
Banzai Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago We are now actively tariffing an ally (and have threatened to double the tariffs) at 25%. We have promised to tariff Taiwan semiconductors, perplexingly. And we have now declared we are going to tariff the EU? Someone go with data as to how this aligns with grand strategy. Was this in the campaign? I guess the play really is isolationism, so buckle up. Also @brabus, I’ll bet that these policies will have a significantly larger effect on grocery prices (along with almost everything else related to middle class and working class families) than widespread H5N1.
ClearedHot Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 8 hours ago, arg said: Have you seen that anywhere else? Ya Vol! 1
brabus Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Banzai said: We are now actively tariffing an ally (and have threatened to double the tariffs) at 25%. We have promised to tariff Taiwan semiconductors, perplexingly. And we have now declared we are going to tariff the EU? Someone go with data as to how this aligns with grand strategy. Was this in the campaign? I guess the play really is isolationism, so buckle up. Also @brabus, I’ll bet that these policies will have a significantly larger effect on grocery prices (along with almost everything else related to middle class and working class families) than widespread H5N1. Actively tariffing two “allies” who continue to not GAF about our shared borders and are directly contributing to significant amounts of American deaths and general degradation of society. Trump uses tariffs as leverage, and he has been extremely successful at wielding them. CA and Mex are welcome to FAFO, or they can start actually doing something about the shit they let pour into our country. Now to the topic of tariffs as a baseline/long term economic strategy, I’m not sure yet. They will certainly raise prices in the short term, but if that yields substantial growth in American production/less reliance on foreign imports in the long term, that is a good thing and potentially worth the short term cost sacrifice. Secondly, if this is done in conjunction with reducing/eliminating the income tax (not holding my breath, but for discussion’s sake), that would essentially mean I pay more for consumables, but way less to the gov’s pockets where I have little to no control over where my money goes. I have control over my own spending, I have zero control over congressional spending. I prefer the former and I think most Americans do too. Edited 19 hours ago by brabus 4
Banzai Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago Meh I’ll just say I bet this doesn’t pan out in some 4D chess way that some of y’all are convinced. 1 2
disgruntledemployee Posted 17 hours ago Author Posted 17 hours ago 11 hours ago, arg said: Have you seen that anywhere else? Yep. Vindman. But if you want to allude that FBI agents doing their job is akin to being a Nazi, isn't the firing of them just the same? Trump ordered their purge so those doing that bidding are just the same, following orders. We can call this one when the lawyers decide.
17D_guy Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 2 hours ago, brabus said: Actively tariffing two “allies” who continue to not GAF about our shared borders and are directly contributing to significant amounts of American deaths and general degradation of society. Trump uses tariffs as leverage, and he has been extremely successful at wielding them. CA and Mex are welcome to FAFO, or they can start actually doing something about the shit they let pour into our country. Now to the topic of tariffs as a baseline/long term economic strategy, I’m not sure yet. They will certainly raise prices in the short term, but if that yields substantial growth in American production/less reliance on foreign imports in the long term, that is a good thing and potentially worth the short term cost sacrifice. Secondly, if this is done in conjunction with reducing/eliminating the income tax (not holding my breath, but for discussion’s sake), that would essentially mean I pay more for consumables, but way less to the gov’s pockets where I have little to no control over where my money goes. I have control over my own spending, I have zero control over congressional spending. I prefer the former and I think most Americans do too. Are you really saying Canada, who we've been aligned with culturally, military, economically for at least 100 years isn't an ally? They were ride or die with us in Afghanistan. Let's planes land in their county on 9/11 and took those people into their homes. Not an ally? What is an ally then? 4
Sua Sponte Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago https://apnews.com/article/doge-musk-trump-classified-information-usaid-security-35101dee28a766e0d9705e0d47958611
arg Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 34 minutes ago, disgruntledemployee said: Yep. Vindman. But if you want to allude that FBI agents doing their job is akin to being a Nazi, isn't the firing of them just the same? Trump ordered their purge so those doing that bidding are just the same, following orders. We can call this one when the lawyers decide. Kinda depends on how it went down. Were they told "go do your job"? Or were they told "go do your job" wink,wink, nod,nod while holding up a pictures like this I'll go out on a limb and say everyone on this board witnessed it in the Military to some degree. I'm guilty of it. CC ordered me to give a letter LoC I didn't feel was warranted. I did let him know I was doing it on his order.
arg Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 11 minutes ago, Sua Sponte said: https://apnews.com/article/doge-musk-trump-classified-information-usaid-security-35101dee28a766e0d9705e0d47958611 It may be the NORCO but I'm having trouble justifying why USAID has classified stuff.
Smokin Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago USAID is basically a government version of an NGO charity and we would laugh if Doctors Without Borders tried to deny an auditor information because it was classified. Additionally, if the President directed it, then security clearances and classification are completely irrelevant as he has ultimate classification authority. If he wants them to look at our space sharks with lasers program, that's his prerogative. Maybe DOGE guys should have done the security paperwork, but there are also a lot of security process stuff that DOGE could address so working within the bureaucratic system to drastically change that system seems a bit counterproductive.
arg Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago (edited) 14 hours ago, uhhello said: This is real life. Grab a beer or three and listen to whole thing. After all that, look who they elected as chair Edited 15 hours ago by arg 1
brabus Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago (edited) 7 hours ago, 17D_guy said: Are you really saying Canada, who we've been aligned with culturally, military, economically for at least 100 years isn't an ally? They were ride or die with us in Afghanistan. Let's planes land in their county on 9/11 and took those people into their homes. Not an ally? What is an ally then? No I’m not saying that all. But looking back I realize how I wrote that could be taken that way, so I don’t blame you for the response. A better way to say it is just because they’re an ally doesn’t mean they don’t face repercussions for actions (and lack of actions) leading to negative outcomes for our country. The carrot hasn’t worked, so here’s the stick. They don’t get anymore free passes just because they’re an ally. Furthermore, as an ally they should act like it and do a lot better WRT border-related issues. We’ll see how long this lasts; my guess is not horribly long as they realize they’re economically way outside our league. Edited 10 hours ago by brabus
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now