ClearedHot Posted Thursday at 02:53 AM Posted Thursday at 02:53 AM 6 hours ago, Day Man said: did i say you defended anything? you have 42 43 posts mentioning Hillary, and simply say "ungood" about this...the inconsistency is obvious Try again... On 3/25/2025 at 6:31 AM, ClearedHot said: I am guessing Hegseth used Signal as part of his former gig at Foxnews which would explain the links to journalists. Also, Signal very popular in the SOF community...there is a whole Signal subculture. Sending it to the wrong person is not the issue, sending classified plans on a non-approved network is the issue. And if he did it he should be punished. Legally Comey help set the precedent that it not a big deal when we all know it is. It took intent from both Hegseth and Clinton to put that material on an unclassified network. 33,000 Hillary Emails had to be transferred off a classified network and copied onto an unclassified server, I never understood how Comey didn't see that as deliberate and with intent. I am very curious how Hegseth's deal plays out...again if the details are correct (to include weapons loads), then it was a deliberate effort to take material off and unclass network (pictures or digitally copied), and put it on Signal...or did he type a note with the details...either way UNSAT, no excuses, time to be held accountable. 1 1
SurelySerious Posted Thursday at 05:04 AM Posted Thursday at 05:04 AM Also something for discussion is the conduct of official business on a message chain set to automatically delete after a week. Doesn’t seem congruent with requirements for record keeping. Tough to FOIA a disappearing Signal message. 1
brickhistory Posted Thursday at 03:49 PM Posted Thursday at 03:49 PM Lost in all the signal noise is the reason for the group chat. Trump directed a whoopin' on Houthis, not just a whack-a-mole on the launchers. Would be really interesting to know the actual BDA. Then there's: https://www.msn.com/en-us/crime/general/top-ms-13-gang-suspect-arrested-in-northern-virginia-doj/ar-AA1BLYCG?ocid=BingNewsSerp https://www.thecentersquare.com/texas/article_625f4088-93b5-4850-a36d-32940244c113.html among just many others wins. So a big kerfuffle over a classified fcuk up (own it, admit it, move on) vs. doing things that the country wanted. LFG!!
brickhistory Posted Thursday at 04:25 PM Posted Thursday at 04:25 PM (edited) From Jan 20, 2021 - Jan 20-2025, 189 pages in this thread while Biden was President, but we still don't know (cough, Obama, cough) who was making decisions. From Jan 20, 2025 - present, 96 pages in this thread. Just shy of 50% of the pages for an entire presidency in 2+ months. Interesting on what some find acceptable. Edited Thursday at 04:27 PM by brickhistory typo 1
disgruntledemployee Posted Thursday at 04:34 PM Author Posted Thursday at 04:34 PM WIRED et al reporting Waltz had his Venmo public until they reported on it. Guess who is in it? Goldberg, Fox Newers, CNNers, and other media types. Maybe he's the leaker on Elon's war plans briefing, which they probably did over Signal after it was cancelled. https://www.wired.com/story/michael-waltz-left-his-venmo-public/ https://prospect.org/politics/2025-03-26-michael-waltz-venmo-public-full-of-journalists/
jrizzell Posted Thursday at 04:44 PM Posted Thursday at 04:44 PM The sole individual responsible for launching a nuclear attack for the past 4 years, was a dementia patient who didn’t have control of his mental facilities. Was this a up, sure. But let’s relax with the pearl clutching; we still don’t know who was running the country during Biden’s presidency. For a party that nominated a candidate who had her own email server while Secretary of State, now they suddenly really care about OPSEC. Someone will fall on this grenade, and we’ll move on.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1
uhhello Posted Thursday at 04:48 PM Posted Thursday at 04:48 PM 1 minute ago, jrizzell said: The sole individual responsible for launching a nuclear attack for the past 4 years, was a dementia patient who didn’t have control of his mental facilities. Was this a up, sure. But let’s relax with the pearl clutching; we still don’t know who was running the country during Biden’s presidency. For a party that nominated a candidate who had her own email server while Secretary of State, now they suddenly really care about OPSEC. Someone will fall on this grenade, and we’ll move on. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk The what about-ism's gotta stop for the republican party. Admit your fuckup, fire/don't fire and move on. Republicans aren't going to 'win' over mainstream media regardless. They will lose some voters who came over for a change. I love the policies (mostly) so far. This is a massive own goal. Move on. As someone said up higher, we could have told the Houthi's everything and it would have had zero effect on their response. 1 6
Sua Sponte Posted Thursday at 04:50 PM Posted Thursday at 04:50 PM 4 minutes ago, jrizzell said: The sole individual responsible for launching a nuclear attack for the past 4 years, was a dementia patient who didn’t have control of his mental facilities. Was this a up, sure. But let’s relax with the pearl clutching; we still don’t know who was running the country during Biden’s presidency. For a party that nominated a candidate who had her own email server while Secretary of State, now they suddenly really care about OPSEC. Someone will fall on this grenade, and we’ll move on. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk If you would’ve done what they did with that type of information, would you’ve been punished either via UCMJ or having your clearance suspended or revoked? It’s a yes or no question. 1
jrizzell Posted Thursday at 07:27 PM Posted Thursday at 07:27 PM If you would’ve done what they did with that type of information, would you’ve been punished either via UCMJ or having your clearance suspended or revoked? It’s a yes or no question. Someone thinks that the rules used against low level members apply to the leadership, how cute. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sua Sponte Posted Thursday at 08:25 PM Posted Thursday at 08:25 PM 58 minutes ago, jrizzell said: Someone thinks that the rules used against low level members apply to the leadership, how cute. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Can't answer the question?
brickhistory Posted Thursday at 08:51 PM Posted Thursday at 08:51 PM How about AWOL for three days? 1
jrizzell Posted Friday at 01:29 AM Posted Friday at 01:29 AM Can't answer the question?I’ll be as clear as I can. I would absolutely be held to a different standard than leadership. Dick Cheney had evidence manufactured to justify starting Iraq War two, killing hundreds of thousands of people; no consequence.James Clapper lied to the Senate about NSA spying on American citizens; no consequenceDrone strike after Abbey gate deaths during Afghan withdrawal, family of 10 murdered; no consequenceFor those in charge it is, and always will be, rules for thee, not me Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1 5
SurelySerious Posted Friday at 05:04 AM Posted Friday at 05:04 AM https://open.substack.com/pub/thebulwark/p/trump-cards-foreign-policy-without-principles-ideas-gambling-rhetoric-power-weakness The message to America’s allies couldn’t be clearer: Trump doesn’t care about friendship, democracy, or sovereignty. All he cares about is cards. Do you have something of monetary value to offer him or his family? Do you have an economic bloc that’s big enough to fight back against the United States? Do you have nuclear weapons?If not, start working on it.The “what have you done for me lately” AF leadership strategy at work
brickhistory Posted Friday at 12:45 PM Posted Friday at 12:45 PM Pallets of dollars on the ramp in Iran. 1 1
Lord Ratner Posted Friday at 04:04 PM Posted Friday at 04:04 PM 23 hours ago, disgruntledemployee said: WIRED et al reporting Waltz had his Venmo public until they reported on it. Guess who is in it? Goldberg, Fox Newers, CNNers, and other media types. Maybe he's the leaker on Elon's war plans briefing, which they probably did over Signal after it was cancelled. https://www.wired.com/story/michael-waltz-left-his-venmo-public/ https://prospect.org/politics/2025-03-26-michael-waltz-venmo-public-full-of-journalists/ I wonder if he uses the same venmo that the rest of us use, where the first thing it asks you when you set up your account is to have access to your contacts to sync them. Sure would be some lazy journalism if they didn't check to make sure that's why his phone contacts all appeared in his venmo like the rest of us. Sure would be lazy of the commentariat to run with it without thinking...
disgruntledemployee Posted Friday at 04:30 PM Author Posted Friday at 04:30 PM 20 minutes ago, Lord Ratner said: I wonder if he uses the same venmo that the rest of us use, where the first thing it asks you when you set up your account is to have access to your contacts to sync them. Sure would be some lazy journalism if they didn't check to make sure that's why his phone contacts all appeared in his venmo like the rest of us. Sure would be lazy of the commentariat to run with it without thinking... I don't think Trump thinks it matters how Venmo has all those media contacts, either the app or his contacts. He pro probably thinks the fact Goldberg is a contact regardless of reason is bad because it means Waltz is in contact with the enemy. Or maybe there was some sort of arrangement between them.
Lord Ratner Posted Friday at 08:44 PM Posted Friday at 08:44 PM 4 hours ago, disgruntledemployee said: I don't think Trump thinks it matters how Venmo has all those media contacts, either the app or his contacts. He pro probably thinks the fact Goldberg is a contact regardless of reason is bad because it means Waltz is in contact with the enemy. Or maybe there was some sort of arrangement between them. You're flailing.
disgruntledemployee Posted Saturday at 03:53 AM Author Posted Saturday at 03:53 AM 7 hours ago, Lord Ratner said: You're flailing. You're blind. Make the call.
brickhistory Posted Saturday at 12:08 PM Posted Saturday at 12:08 PM Hmmm, a nation acting in its own best interests. Other, smaller nations deciding where to hitch their wagons in their own best interests. Whatever is the world becoming? 1
SurelySerious Posted Saturday at 04:41 PM Posted Saturday at 04:41 PM Bet he didn’t even bother to say thank you. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now