Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
14 hours ago, disgruntledemployee said:

P.S. Biden on a campaign trail will probably end with him in a serious health crisis.  His mental capabilities will be fully revealed.  If in a debate, 1st question I'd ask him is 29 x 7 = ?  Dems know this so he ain't running, no matter what they say.  Too big a gamble.  But it would be sad entertainment to see Biden fight against the DNC machine to try a run.

My future prediction: Assuming Biden wins the primaries and runs for a second term (yes, big assumption...but I think also a realistic COA right now) I highly doubt Biden will show up for any debates. There will be some magical reason for him to not attend, or rather, debates will get labeled whatever new buzz word that will provide the needed opportunity for the DNC to skip all debates.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Lord Ratner said:

Forgot about this gem. Whose job is it to prove guilt, the accusing party, or the defense?

You.  Be sure to post links and other evidence.  Spend a few hours, I need to be really well convinced. /Sarc/

7 hours ago, Lord Ratner said:

Can you define that first. To me that means some foreign entity somewhere can control him, as unproven for years now including the largest Special Prosecutor investigation ever.

No.  Ain't gonna waste time trying.  I still don't understand why you defend a dishonorable, no integrity, ass hat. 

7 hours ago, Lord Ratner said:

So what do you mean by that? For those conservatives wondering why the Trump turd can't flush, this type of bullshit is exactly why. His supporters don't have clearly defined political views, but they're tired of the sense that they've been lied to, about everything, for years. People twisting the truth or exaggerating reality regarding Donald Trump's many shortcomings makes them sense the same elitist bullshit and rally around him.

It's actually quite easy.  Reach into your brain, and flush... twice as I'm sure that turd will try to cling to the bowl.  There.  Done.  Gone.  Now find a new champion.

8 hours ago, Lord Ratner said:

I really, really, really want Donald Trump to be gone, but everybody's going to get this man reelected if we can't rededicate ourself to objective truth, and that includes the Republican party.

Then do it man.  Just drop him and all his bullshit.  Find a better person to support. 

-----------------

Anyway, I've said my piece, and peace.  Just so you know where I stand, and I hope others as well, is Trump is done, don't want to see him in govt ever again.  Biden is medically senile and should be replaced but Harris is incompetent.  The Biden prop up machine, Easter Bunny included, can't sustain this.  Ever see dementia progress?  He's probably had micro strokes.  I'm waiting for the press conference where Biden drops his pants. 

Anyway, thanks for the volleyball.

Out

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, StoleIt said:

My future prediction: Assuming Biden wins the primaries and runs for a second term (yes, big assumption...but I think also a realistic COA right now) I highly doubt Biden will show up for any debates. There will be some magical reason for him to not attend, or rather, debates will get labeled whatever new buzz word that will provide the needed opportunity for the DNC to skip all debates.

Biden and the Prop Up Machine will play the 5 D's of debate defense, Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive, Dodge.  Any of the other D's running, all they have to do is call him chicken, and I hope other D's try as the nation deserves a better D candidate (I know, careful what I wish for).  IF Biden gets the nom, then I fully expect Biden to be called chicken, scare-d-cat, yellow, coward, runs from a fight, spineless, etc.  How can he face a world leader if he can't face a Pres challenger?  Then there will be a full court press on his health.  Biden is one trip and fall away from leaving office.

Posted
4 hours ago, disgruntledemployee said:

No.  Ain't gonna waste time trying.  I still don't understand why you defend a dishonorable, no integrity, ass hat.

I see very few people on here defending Trump, most have said they want him to go away.  That being said believe whatever you want about his morale character but there has never been a time when the entire system unfairly aligned against a sitting president, not because he did something wrong but because they didn't like him.  Partisan dirty politics is one thing but when the free press pushes false narratives, cheers for failure and ACTIVELY suppresses stories like the laptop then we have another situation.  And when the FBI and the U.S. Intelligence apparatus acts on behalf one one political party we should all be outraged and demand change.

Yes I am happy to flush Trump, but I also want to flush the crooks on the other side and you should too.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 7
Posted
18 hours ago, StoleIt said:

My future prediction: Assuming Biden wins the primaries and runs for a second term (yes, big assumption...but I think also a realistic COA right now) I highly doubt Biden will show up for any debates. There will be some magical reason for him to not attend, or rather, debates will get labeled whatever new buzz word that will provide the needed opportunity for the DNC to skip all debates.

That’s exactly what’s going on in the New York Governor race. Incumbent Dem Governor refuses to debate her opponent Zeldin.  Now, Zeldin has closed the gap within margin of error. 

Posted
18 hours ago, disgruntledemployee said:

Biden and the Prop Up Machine will play the 5 D's of debate defense, Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive, Dodge.  Any of the other D's running, all they have to do is call him chicken, and I hope other D's try as the nation deserves a better D candidate (I know, careful what I wish for).  IF Biden gets the nom, then I fully expect Biden to be called chicken, scare-d-cat, yellow, coward, runs from a fight, spineless, etc.  How can he face a world leader if he can't face a Pres challenger?  Then there will be a full court press on his health.  Biden is one trip and fall away from leaving office.

And then all Biden’s opponent has to do is play on repeat videos of Afghans falling off a C-17.  If America re-elects Biden after that….we’ll as they say, we get the government we deserve. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
On 10/8/2022 at 10:54 AM, Lord Ratner said:

I may be mistaken, but I believe Trump did materially increase production. That would be the geopolitical version of saying " fuck off" to OPEC.

It's clear in the graph Day Man posted...

image.png.9185b5547370d001a61e4b2c47a73e5f.png
 

  • Upvote 1
Posted (edited)
18 hours ago, M2 said:

It's clear in the graph Day Man posted...

image.png.9185b5547370d001a61e4b2c47a73e5f.png
 

shhhhhhhh.   If you keep posting facts, people will notice the 12,xxx  numbers that started as 9,xxx numbers during Trump's term.

edit: I identify as a someone who never voted for trump

Edited by FourFans130
  • Upvote 1
Posted (edited)

While oil production is a big factor,  US refinery is the bottleneck.

During 2017, 6 refineries closed. Probaly all tied to business decisions, not politics.  2020, 6 more, again probably business tied to covid drop in demand and closing older sites.

They can pump all they want, but if it can't be refined, consumer prices don't change.  Also, hurricanes.

Screenshot_20221011-102426_Firefox.thumb.jpg.485325458a4c54d1b9e02171fd755982.jpg

https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=8_NA_8O0_NUS_C&f=A

Edited by disgruntledemployee
Posted
39 minutes ago, disgruntledemployee said:

During 2017, 6 refineries closed. Probaly all tied to business decisions, not politics. 

Quick yes or no question:

Do rules/regulations, either set by US law and/or regulatory organizations, ever impact what a business decides to do or not do?

Posted
17 minutes ago, HeloDude said:

Quick yes or no question:

Do rules/regulations, either set by US law and/or regulatory organizations, ever impact what a business decides to do or not do?

Don't know, ain't gonna try.  Ask an oil field expert if you really want to know.  You get an internet point.

8 minutes ago, SurelySerious said:

We have millions of barrels of SPR to refill. Probably not a lot of bottleneck there.

True.  Just pointing out that more oil drilling capacity probably doesn't directly equate to lower prices at the pump.

Posted
True.  Just pointing out that more oil drilling capacity probably doesn't directly equate to lower prices at the pump.

I know a couple oil field experts…

So discussion as to “why is big oil recording record profits…” comes from them making a deliberate effort to grow cash reserves that had been depleted over the last few years. A large driver in doing this is the expected drop in leasable well heads and lands to do exploratory drilling under the shift in administrations. The anticipation is that with lower leasable heads the price per well will jump and the company without the free cash to go after them will be left out of the dwindling available US market.

The oil companies are literally planning for the rainy day that the admin is telegraphing is coming whether they like it or not, and we as consumers are paying for it. So yes, the President does have a hand in this along with OPEC, taxes by region, and supply lines and every other talking point issue on why gas costs so much.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Upvote 2
Posted
4 hours ago, disgruntledemployee said:

While oil production is a big factor,  US refinery is the bottleneck.

During 2017, 6 refineries closed. Probaly all tied to business decisions, not politics.  2020, 6 more, again probably business tied to covid drop in demand and closing older sites.

They can pump all they want, but if it can't be refined, consumer prices don't change.  Also, hurricanes.

 

3 hours ago, disgruntledemployee said:

Don't know, ain't gonna try.  Ask an oil field expert if you really want to know.  You get an internet point.

So in one post you give information regarding oil production/refinery capabilities, and also say that it has to do with business decisions and not politics.  But then I ask you if laws and/or rules/regulations affect business decisions and you say you don’t know because you’re not an oil expert.

Ummm, ok.  Good talk!

  • Upvote 2
Posted

New National Security strategy 

Less than a paragraph on great power competition, China, and Russia.

Most of it talks about “domestic extremism”, white nationalism, the Jan 6 “attacks”, diversity and inclusion. Even some Climate Change sprinkled in. 

Biden-Harris-Administrations-National-Se

  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
New National Security strategy 
Less than a paragraph on great power competition, China, and Russia.
Most of it talks about “domestic extremism”, white nationalism, the Jan 6 “attacks”, diversity and inclusion. Even some Climate Change sprinkled in. 
Biden-Harris-Administrations-National-Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf?fbclid=IwAR30zQ6u98FqmezFc0m3_s9NMjy4t9L119qWxE3FqMqATDTXWS0AqLg1uvE#:~:text=The%202022%20National%20Security%20Strategy%20outlines%20how%20my,path%20toward%20a%20brighter%20and%20more%20hopeful%20tomorrow.

A quick search shows 9 hits for China, 46 for PRC, 71 for Russia, 2 for extremism, 6 for extremist, 1 for nationalism, 1 mention of the word white, in reference to “White House,” nothing about January 6th, 2 mentions of diversity and 2 of inclusion with regards to the military. You do get 20 instances of Climate Change, so congrats. So where did you come up with your premise? I’m no fan of the admin, but you’re either making up your own fake news, or parroting someone else’s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 2
  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 1
Posted

…meanwhile another interpretation:

it reads like the whole world will be skipping, happily together in-hand if they follow American values and present international order (whilst somehow following and fighting for their own country’s) and we will all be Free, Open, Prosperous, and Secure…unless there is bad people spoiling the festivities, then together we’ll do…something, like share information with those who share our values. 
 

image.gif.42559eff835c1d41b5f4bcb426c44763.gif

 

image.jpeg

Posted
31 minutes ago, Swizzle said:

…meanwhile another interpretation:

it reads like the whole world will be skipping, happily together in-hand if they follow American values and present international order (whilst somehow following and fighting for their own country’s) and we will all be Free, Open, Prosperous, and Secure…unless there is bad people spoiling the festivities, then together we’ll do…something, like share information with those who share our values. 
 

image.gif.42559eff835c1d41b5f4bcb426c44763.gif

 

image.jpeg

The Golden Girls could turn this country around.  

  • Like 2
Posted
11 hours ago, CaptainMorgan said:

A quick search shows 9 hits for China, 46 for PRC, 71 for Russia

Saying the words multiple times doesn't make them the focus and context matters. 

 

12 hours ago, CaptainMorgan said:

2 for extremism, 6 for extremist, 1 for nationalism

Equity is mentioned 6 times, Inclusion is mentioned 6 times, the emphasis is clear.

 

12 hours ago, CaptainMorgan said:

nothing about January 6th,
 

That's not true and you know it or you didn't actually read it.  The entire "Strengthening Our Democracy" is about the election and aftermath, the wordsmiths just got creative so they wouldn't have to use the words.

 

12 hours ago, CaptainMorgan said:

2 mentions of diversity and 2 of inclusion with regards to the military.

In the same section there is one mention of China and no mentions of Russia.  Again, context and emphasis matter.

12 hours ago, CaptainMorgan said:

So where did you come up with your premise?

No sure about dream big, but I read it.

Overall I give it a C, there was an attempt to work in all the DIME instruments but the social and climate change goop dilutes this into a fairy tale.  I am a knuckle-dragging mouth breather but I did note these other items. 

When reading you will note the first theme in his vision is Climate Change.  He proceeds to countering authoritarian regimes but comes right back to Climate Change with this statement - "Of all of the shared problems we face, climate change is the greatest and potentially existential for all nations.I am sorry, Climate Change is an important issue but with Putin dropping threats to use tac nukes that could lead to Armageddon, I think there is a bigger threat to the survival of our country and mankind.

In Climate Change section there is another "work of art" - "We have also experienced a global energy crisis driven by Russia’s weaponization of the oil and gas supplies it controls, exacerbated by OPEC’s management of its own supply."  It is a fact that gas prices were WAY up BEFORE Putin invaded Ukraine.  Also, there is a solution that makes us energy independent. 

I really enjoyed him throwing Clinton's vision under the bus "Fifth, we recognize that globalization has delivered immense benefits for the United States and the world but an adjustment is now required to cope with dramatic global changes such as
widening inequality within and among countries" 
No Shit, this so called globalization outsourced a metric shit ton of American jobs and manufacturing...micro chips for all my friends.

The section on modernizing and strengthening our military is capped off with his social agenda - "We will strengthen the effectiveness of the force by promoting diversity and inclusion; intensifying our suicide prevention efforts; eliminating the scourges of sexual assault, harassment, and other forms of violence, abuse, and discrimination;"

The section on Climate and Energy Security is again nothing but social agenda.  Again to quote "Events like Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine have made clear the urgent need to accelerate the transition away from fossil fuels."  Not a single word about securing energy for America, just his agenda to shut down fossil fuels...an abhorrent fail IMHO.

  • Like 5
  • Upvote 1
Posted
6 hours ago, ClearedHot said:

"Of all of the shared problems we face, climate change is the greatest and potentially existential for all nations.I am sorry, Climate Change is an important issue but with Putin dropping threats to use tac nukes

Do nuclear detonations count as instantaneous climate change? Or is that too much political spin?

  • Haha 4
Posted
Do nuclear detonations count as instantaneous climate change? Or is that too much political spin?

That is one of my biggest “you’re an idiot and here is why” point for the people that look at Ecological impacts and ignore economics.

It doesn’t matter how god damned clean you make the planet if the results of your actions cause the mass strife leading to some strong man lunatic in a nuclear power making new craters in Kashmir or something. You will go back on a whole lot of work with some simplistic single metric like axing carbon if you do it while simultaneously making the price of food/utilities unaffordable, amplifying water scarcity impacts by diverting from agriculture, bankrupting governments dependent on fossil fuel income to support their near crazy citizenry, etc.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
22 hours ago, Swizzle said:

Do nuclear detonations count as instantaneous climate change? Or is that too much political spin?

That's some serious localized Global Warming right there. SPF 50,000 required. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...