Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Today, May 3rd in perhaps one of the tone def actions taken by the Biden administration (and that is saying something), the U.S. Department of Education announced an investigation of Emory University over...."Anti-Muslim discrimination."  Seriously, if you voted for this clown, punch yourself in the gonads, repeatedly.  Weeks of campus protests calling for genocide and the destruction of Israel...this is the response. 

  • Like 6
  • Upvote 2
Posted

I completely understand the distaste for trump, but holy shit, if one votes a second time for this disaster admin, they’re brain dead. 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 5
Posted
5 hours ago, ClearedHot said:

Today, May 3rd in perhaps one of the tone def actions taken by the Biden administration (and that is saying something), the U.S. Department of Education announced an investigation of Emory University over...."Anti-Muslim discrimination."  Seriously, if you voted for this clown, punch yourself in the gonads, repeatedly.  Weeks of campus protests calling for genocide and the destruction of Israel...this is the response. 

Anything to cancel student debt....

  • Upvote 2
Posted
On 5/3/2024 at 9:29 AM, HeloDude said:

There are several different threads I could post this, but since this one has been quiet lately, here it goes:

So the Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, the main agency advising Biden on economic policy, doesn’t really understand how the government borrows its own money.

 

There are 5th graders who know more about our economy.  

Bernstein...with a name that Jewish, you'd think he'd know a little more about money.  

  • Haha 1
Posted

After the 10+ time of telling CO I have not been a resident for 10 years and to take me off their registered voter list (and they promised me they would), my in-laws received yet another mail-in ballot for me. The election machine is well oiled in this country, nothing to see here!

Posted
1 hour ago, brabus said:

The election machine is well oiled in this country, nothing to see here!

every-vote-counts-black-sheep.gif.f69af393fb9ed2d017e305faaedc3798.gif

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted
3 hours ago, lloyd christmas said:

Somewhere between 80k and 100k people were at the Trump rally in New Jersey yesterday.

That says something.  

Sadly that’s everyone outside of the Newark / Edison / Philly metro - guess who has higher numbers. Same with upstate Ny - outside major metros it’s about as red as you can get, but the city outvotes everyone. 

Posted (edited)

Between Biden and Trump, I'd rather have Trump.   In a normal world, I'd never consider voting for Trump but Biden and his crew of flunkies have got to go.  I knew a retarded dog who was more self aware than Biden. 

Edited by Biff_T
Spelling bee failure
  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1
Posted
2 hours ago, dream big said:

Sadly that’s everyone outside of the Newark / Edison / Philly metro - guess who has higher numbers. Same with upstate Ny - outside major metros it’s about as red as you can get, but the city outvotes everyone. 

Sure, but there’s a difference between voting for someone and going to his rallies as well as voting for him.  I’ll vote for Trump because I agreed with a lot (definitely not all) of his policies (even though I personally dislike him) when he was president, and I agree with very few of Biden’s and also think he has major cognitive issues…but I’ll never go to a Trump rally, even it was within a 30 min drive.  So I think the rallies are a reflection of the differences in enthusiasm for the candidates, which is what the vast majority of the polls have been saying for a while.  Now Trump still had far more people at campaign events in 2020 compared to Biden, but that was also in the height of Covid… which today very few people seem concerned.

The vast majority of the polls also show that Trump is doing quite a bit better with minorities compared to 2016 and 2020.  Add in the fact that Biden’s approval numbers have been in the upper 30s/low 40s for quite a long time…which no president in recent times have been reelected with such low approval numbers 6 months out from the election, and I think the nod today definitely goes to Trump.

I think it will once again come down to turnout, and don’t underestimate the Dem turnout machine.  I wouldn’t be surprised if either one when given how divided the country is, but if I had to put money on one today, it would be Trump.

  • Upvote 2
Posted
7 hours ago, HeloDude said:

Sure, but there’s a difference between voting for someone and going to his rallies as well as voting for him.  I’ll vote for Trump because I agreed with a lot (definitely not all) of his policies (even though I personally dislike him) when he was president, and I agree with very few of Biden’s and also think he has major cognitive issues…but I’ll never go to a Trump rally, even it was within a 30 min drive.  So I think the rallies are a reflection of the differences in enthusiasm for the candidates, which is what the vast majority of the polls have been saying for a while.  Now Trump still had far more people at campaign events in 2020 compared to Biden, but that was also in the height of Covid… which today very few people seem concerned.

The vast majority of the polls also show that Trump is doing quite a bit better with minorities compared to 2016 and 2020.  Add in the fact that Biden’s approval numbers have been in the upper 30s/low 40s for quite a long time…which no president in recent times have been reelected with such low approval numbers 6 months out from the election, and I think the nod today definitely goes to Trump.

I think it will once again come down to turnout, and don’t underestimate the Dem turnout machine.  I wouldn’t be surprised if either one when given how divided the country is, but if I had to put money on one today, it would be Trump.

I think and hope its going to be a blowout.  Most fence sitters aren't going to say they are voting for trump.  If polls are to be believed (they shouldn't) then Trump is out in front from what I've seen.  I really fear the potential outcomes if its really close.  Either way.  

Posted

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Day Man said:

glad you like Billl Maher

I like him sometimes.   He can get annoying as well but he makes good points every now and then.  

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, Day Man said:

 

glad you like Billl Maher

Wait, a human can have multiple views on a variety of topics and other humans can agree with a subset of those views without endorsing all of them?

Do better

Edited by Lord Ratner
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Lord Ratner said:

Wait, a human can have multiple views on a variety of topics and other humans can agree with a subset of those views without endorsing all of them?

Do better

A human can but apparently a Democrat cannot.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, ClearedHot said:

A human can but apparently a Democrat cannot.

This.  All day long. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, ClearedHot said:

Lol.  Still doing it.  If I plagiarized a speech in College, ALS, OTS, ASBC, or SOS,  I would have been punished.   Why does the fucking President get a pass.  It's basic speech writing, my son in High School can do better.   He would also be pusnished by his school for plagiarizing.   

Posted
1 minute ago, Biff_T said:

Lol.  Still doing it.  If I plagiarized a speech in College, ALS, OTS, ASBC, or SOS,  I would have been punished.   Why does the fucking President get a pass.  It's basic speech writing, my son in High School can do better.   He would also be pusnished by his school for plagiarizing.   

Who cares if he plagarized a speech.  He is CLEARLY the senile old man on your block who is starting to get angry at folks for thinking he's senile.  It won't be long.  There is no way he's president in a year.  No way.   

  • Upvote 2
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, uhhello said:

Who cares if he plagarized a speech. 

If he's (and his cabinet) too stupid to realize everyone on Earth has access to 99% of the speeches given in the last 100 years, he's probably too stupid to defend our country in a World War.  That's what I'm really concerned about.  

 

Edit: and his cabinet 

Edited by Biff_T
Afterthought.
Posted (edited)

To be fair, he did say (mumble) “quote”.

But he’s no Gipper, that’s for sure.

Edited by BFM this
  • Upvote 1
Posted
If he's (and his cabinet) too stupid to realize everyone on Earth has access to 99% of the speeches given in the last 100 years, he's probably too stupid to defend our country in a World War.  That's what I'm really concerned about.  
 
Edit: and his cabinet 


It’s not that they are too stupid, they assume we are too stupid to know any difference. They only look down on us. It’s the elitist attitude.


Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app
  • Like 1
  • Upvote 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...