Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, ViperMan said:

You could (I would) say that I'm a "math inclined" person. A 30% deviation from the norm with large numbers like this is what you call a signal. It's not noise. There is 100% something there. What is it? I can't say. But there is a signal there.

Trump lost by how many million last time, and won by how many this time? That swing accounts for a significant portion. Also the left went from defeating the literal devil in their minds, to supporting someone who had the charisma of a wet paper bag. That accounts for some more.

Further the overall turnout driven by the pandemic probably resulted in a lot of people who only voted because they were bored not voting this time around. 

 

I'm not saying it's not significant, but it's also not inexplicable.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, Lord Ratner said:

Trump lost by how many million last time, and won by how many this time? That swing accounts for a significant portion. Also the left went from defeating the literal devil in their minds, to supporting someone who had the charisma of a wet paper bag. That accounts for some more.

Further the overall turnout driven by the pandemic probably resulted in a lot of people who only voted because they were bored not voting this time around. 

I'm not saying it's not significant, but it's also not inexplicable.

Pandemic turnout could be an interesting avenue to explore.

81,000,000 votes down to ~62,000,000 votes DOES NOT MAKE SENSE. That is inexplicable. It cannot be hand-waived. That is an unbelievable difference in voter turnout. You're talking 20,000,000 people showing up, and then not showing up.

That doesn't happen without a very clear reason. Period.

Edited by ViperMan
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 3
Posted
3 hours ago, ViperMan said:

Pandemic turnout could be an interesting avenue to explore.

81,000,000 votes down to ~62,000,000 votes DOES NOT MAKE SENSE. That is inexplicable. It cannot be hand-waived. That is an unbelievable difference in voter turnout. You're talking 20,000,000 people showing up, and then not showing up.

That doesn't happen without a very clear reason. Period.

"Let's just get along and move forward" isn't going to happen. Trump has been prosecuted and ridiculed over his claims of a stolen election for four years. Is he the type of guy to shrug it off and focus on the future? He is going to turn the federal government inside out to resolve what happened in 2020. The biggest data destruction event in US history is going to take place in the next couple months. However, I believe there will be a lot of people that will retain evidence to protect themselves.

Posted (edited)

I think this is a large part of it.

UpdatedMap_October_23_NoDate.webp.d13c76a05f14879929f672e6ae49adc7.webp

(https://www.brookings.edu/articles/voting-by-mail-in-a-pandemic-a-state-by-state-scorecard/)

States were awarded higher grades on this graphic for "Voters automatically receive a ballot" and "Ballot does not require a witness signature." They were docked points for "Voters are required to provide a copy of photo ID for the mail application and/or ballot."

I see a lot of left leaning As and Bs and a lot of right leaning Fs and Ds.

2020 Electoral College for comparison

image.thumb.png.3698ffdc12053f8925bfae80972085d4.png

Edited by nunya
Posted

 I also find this 20 million number troubling. Good point about the Covid mail in ballots explaining part of this, but I would argue that during Covid, people were petrified to leave their homes, much less vote., especially Democrats, who seemed the most nervous about Covid.  I really find it incredulous that 20 million more votes were cast in 2020.. 

Posted
9 hours ago, ViperMan said:

81,000,000 votes down to ~62,000,000 votes DOES NOT MAKE SENSE. That is inexplicable.
That doesn't happen without a very clear reason. Period.

It's anomalous in national politics, and definitely bears exploring.  The only thing known for certain: it can't be fraud.  Biden was the most popular POTUS in our history and the election process is airtight.  

  • Haha 2
  • Upvote 1
Posted

Maybe a few mil didn't vote for either Trump or Harris, and none of the listed alternatives, like me, but i can't see 20M going that.  Or maybe 20mil thought we're fucked either way and didn't bother.  That, I can understand. 

So, yes, it is a big signal.

Posted

One of the most telling images of the evening.

CNN anchor Jake Tapper was left stunned after learning Kamala Harris failed to outperform Biden in any state. CNN

Break Break....WTF is up with Arizona and Nevada, still counting votes 2.5 days later (Arizona is still at 69%), Florida counted all their votes in 2.5 hours.

 

Posted

This is contrary to much of the 'get out the vote' movements, but I personally think a low voter turnout is not inherently a bad thing.  The level of ignorance of many voters is absolutely shocking.  If you don't take the time to become informed enough to make a reasonable decision, then you shouldn't vote.

I also agree that many voters were likely completely uninspired by either option and simply decided it wasn't worth their time if a ballot didn't magically show up in their mailbox unrequested.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

If you look further back Kamala’s turnout numbers aren’t the anomaly, they’re a reversion to the mean. Hillary got 65M in 2016 and kamala got 68M this year. This just shows how much of an anomaly 2020 was. With the George Floyd riots and covid bringing out tons of low propensity voters and TDS at its peak, 2020 was always going to be a record year for Dems. 
 

20M is a crazy number but it just shows how insane the country was at that point. Everything felt like it was on a knifes edge

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Poster write,

“ With the George Floyd riots and covid bringing out tonsof low propensity voters and TDS at its peak”

 

  That’s kind of my point, were George Floyd BLM rioters and anarchists really that much more motivated to vote, and how many Rioters were there really? Add to this the absolute Hysteria that gripped the largely Democrat ranks, I find it incredulous that Covid, mail in ballots, or motivation to leave a safe home and vote during a pandemic that still scares most democrats today, would account for 20 MILLION EXTRA VOTES. A FEW MILLION, MAYBE BUT NOT 20,000,000. I’d love for some whistleblower to surface.

Edited by Vito
Posted

It's more like 20M not showing up, 20M showing up, then 20M not showing up again.  Not sure if anyone is looking into the data to see why the turnout was so high in 2020, but I'm sure it would be a great story for someone willing to nerd out in the data.

Posted

I found this chart pretty interesting:
burnies-take-on-voter-turnout-v0-oy9cx9t

Basically, Trump did a better job getting people to vote than Kamala did. The Republican's didn't win the election, the Democrats lost it. My guess: because they ran a person people didn't like.

Even Bernie agrees with me:

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, brabus said:

Trump appointing the first female CoS in history - fucking sexist Hitler.

She was leading Trump's campaign and he won.  He's just picking a winner.  Let's see if she lasts a year.  Lots of bootlickers out there that want a piece and she'll be sniping their asses left and right.  If one sneaks in....

Posted
Quote
17 minutes ago, disgruntledemployee said:

She was leading Trump's campaign and he won.  He's just picking a winner.  Let's see if she lasts a year.  Lots of bootlickers out there that want a piece and she'll be sniping their asses left and right.  If one sneaks in....

 

You missed the point. Not that I’m surprised. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, disgruntledemployee said:

She was leading Trump's campaign and he won.  He's just picking a winner.  Let's see if she lasts a year.  Lots of bootlickers out there that want a piece and she'll be sniping their asses left and right.  If one sneaks in....

Your username name really fits right now, just in case you weren’t tracking.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

It would take every Ranger in the 75th to get through this fucking fat body. I'm clearly not an elite and had to do some googling to figure out this guy comes from one of the Top 10 richest families in the US. One RCH deeper reveals their wealth was built through development and expansion of the Hyatt hotel chain. Wasn't a fan of the chain before, but I'll be sure to avoid the abortion riddled, alphabet soup stuffed, snowflake draped cesspool further.

Posted (edited)

Pritzger,

another Democrat out there trying to console and comfort all the Democrat snowflakes who are sooooooo scared of what’s coming! Why do democrats revel in their fear and weakness. Here’s a grown man telling other grown men and women to grab their safety animal (stuffed toy) and run to a safe place. How did the democrat party go from a working class, blue collar party, populated by the same men who stormed the beaches of Normandy and Iowa Jima, into a party of soy boys, effeminate Beta’s, and weak, hysterical women, who aren’t t even embarrassed about crying over an election. Look at Jimmy Kimmel. So weak, so scared, so BETA, AND THEY ARE PROUD OF IT!  This is why they lost the Black Male and Hispanic votes. WHO wants to be associated with such pathetic whiners?

Edited by Vito
  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
Posted
57 minutes ago, BashiChuni said:

 

Democrats gonna cry about this one, I can already hear the screeching now.
 

But If he can just manage to impose term limits on congress that would be one of the greatest achievements of any president ever.

  • Upvote 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...