The Next President is...

[StoleIt]

Daddy Biden pardons Baby (Hunter) Biden. Calls it an unfair witch hunt.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-biden/joe-biden-issue-pardon-son-hunter-biden-rcna182369

 

[skybert]

Tell me you’re a family of slime bags without telling me you’re a family of slime bags..

 

 At least the laptop story was fake……..right?

[SurelySerious]

Should have taken the Frank Costanza approach, “Hunter we've had it with you. Understand? We love you like a son, but even parents have limits.”

Guess nepotism is in, baby!

[brabus]

Joe’s legacy is complete dogshit. He had no face to save by not pardoning Hunter, so from his POV might as well - probably the most logical thought/decision he’s had in decades.

[lloyd christmas]

Biden didn't pardon Hunter.  He pardoned himself.  I’m confident the Bidens are easily one of the most corrupt families in the history of this country.  Hopefully, when history writes itself, the truth and evidence come out.  

These people make me sick.  I hope they pay.  Even if it is just in the history books.  

[HeloDude]

Biden said he would not pardon his son, but did it anyway.  I always predicted this would happen.  Anyone who is surprised by this, well, they shouldn’t be.  To be fair, I truly think Trump would have done the same if he were in a similar situation.

[BashiChuni]

[BashiChuni]

[Smokin]

Not even remotely surprised.  First, as many have said, Joe's a corrupt politician at his core and closing all investigations into this would protect himself as well.  Second, his son was facing a potential lengthy prison term.  I get that the right thing to do was to let justice happen, but I doubt many fathers would have been able to let justice run its course when they could just sign a pardon.

[skybert]

Because the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree?

[HuggyU2]

https://apnews.com/article/president-joe-biden-hunter-biden-18efb958a5365eebda5bb3da411c4326

[BashiChuni]

 

[BashiChuni]

There’s SO much smoke with this Ukraine involvement. The truth will come out. 

[ClearedHot]

So rather than merely pardoning his son for the gun crimes for which he was convicted  and the tax crimes for which he plead guilt, Biden’s pardon covers all "offenses against the United States which he has committed or may have committed or taken part in" from Jan. 1, 2014, through Dec. 1, 2024.  Joe is covered his tracks and blocking any route to discover his crimes against America. 

Can't wait for the usual suspects to spin this and drop some Trump Whataboutism.

[brabus]

@ClearedHot My initial comment above was when I was just thinking the gun and tax crimes, but now I’ve read more and saw the 10 yr timespan that’s covered. This was as much a “shadow” pardon for Joe as it was an outward one for Hunter. Absolute garbage humans - my only Christmas wish (that will never come true) is to have Joe and Fauci dumped into the general population at Rikers and let that run its course…they deserve all of that and more.

[BashiChuni]

https://www.marcopolo501c3.org/p/report-on-the-biden-laptop
 

holy shit there’s a 600 page deep dive on the Biden crime family here. INCREDIBLE reporting. Give it a look. There’s too much to post here. 
 

No wonder they quashed his laptop  it’s damning  

Edited December 2, 2024 by BashiChuni

[BashiChuni]

Once fully fleshed out Ukraine will be the biggest scandal in US history. 

[ClearedHot]

8 hours ago, ClearedHot said:

Can't wait for the usual suspects to spin this and drop some Trump Whataboutism.

8 minutes ago, Negatory said:

Totally unacceptable to pardon your son like that, an abuse of power.

Which is why Dems are obviously publicly upset and non supportive.

https://www.mediaite.com/news/biden-supporters-slam-hunter-biden-pardon-decision-utter-bullsht/

The good thing is, we’re finally getting a president in the seat that wouldn’t abuse his power to pardon folks simply because they’re family related. For example, wouldn’t it be crazy if a sitting president pardoned his daughter’s father in law, just because he has close ties? And he surely wouldn’t do that to then make him a high ranking ambassador in a future administration. That would be absolutely absurd, something a democrat would do.

I for one am glad that we are going to uncover the corruption of all people, regardless of their position, party, ties, or influence. Every person charged with felonies, regardless of who they are, should face the consequences of those actions, especially if convicted by the legal system.

There it is!

[BashiChuni]

I don’t give a shit about hunter. He’s the bag man. 
 

the REAL criminal is Joe. 

[Lord Ratner]

Here's what I would do.

 

Pull up everything the intel world has on Biden's dealings in Ukraine. Whatever he was doing, we assuredly have intel on. So let's assume there's dirt there. 

 

Roll into office and in the first week grant Joe Biden and his entire family blanket immunity for the same timeframe of Hunter's pardon. Tell everyone that the country needs to move on and heal, and even though Biden tried to use the Justice system against him, President Trump isn't going to perpetuate the cycle. 

 

Then declassify everything regarding the Bidens. A little sunshine will do the country well, and roaches hate it.

[HeloDude]

On 10/20/2023 at 10:48 PM, Sua Sponte said:

I agree that the elites are rarely charged held to justice for their crimes, however there’s a very good chance Trump will be going to prison in New York, Georgia, and/or federal. A huge reason why he’s running for president again is so he can pardon himself and cronies and get rid of all the federal punitive landscape that he’s currently caught in. 

 

On 10/20/2023 at 11:33 PM, HeloDude said:

Feel free to quote me on this in the future:  If Trump is the GOP nominee (likely, unfortunately) and wins in November 2024 (I give him 40% chance at this point), if he is still alive on January 20th, 2025, then he’s is physically in the White House…regardless if he’s a convicted felon in Georgia or anywhere else.

What a difference a year can make.

[Smokin]

13 minutes ago, Negatory said:

Sorry, do you know what whataboutism is or do you just say big words to try to sound smart? And are you intending to be this divisive?

I clearly addressed the point you made by stating that Biden should not have pardoned Hunter. Even called it an abuse of power. Done.

Whataboutism would have had me avoid that point and only talk about counter accusations. Stating that Trump is also bad (and has and almost definitely would have done the same) after addressing your point is simply a sarcastic observation.

You all are just scared to approach those comments because none of you know how to effectively address them. Or you struggle to understand how to reconcile the obvious paradoxes in your moral compasses within what you would like to believe are superior conservative worldviews. 

A worldview in which you all gloat about electing a cheating, lying, criminal into the presidency. Yes, I have citations. At least you can cope by focusing blindly on how the other side is bad. It’s called cognitive dissonance as I’ve stated numerous times before. 

I get it, Kamala sucks. I’m glad she didn’t win in many ways, just like you. But you guys are compromising your own morals and doing more harm than good for society with how you address those that were slightly on the other side of the scales when deciding between two absolute turds.

China right now is excited you are playing into their hands. Meme posted on Election Day made me think of you all:

I compromised nothing by voting against a politician that would continue our last four years of national decline (which has only helped China).  Calling out corruption in our government is not cognitive dissonance, it is the lifeblood of a republic.  I also have no problem calling out Trump or any other Republican for corruption.  I don't think Trump is a saint, but I also think that your calling him a criminal when he has clearly been targeted by the exact type of personal prosecution that Biden used as an excuse to pardon his son is ironic.  If Trump had not be President and simply stayed a business man and still did everything that he has been charged with, I think there is exactly a zero percent chance that he would have been charged with anything, let alone convicted.  On the other hand, people are charged with gun law violations every day, so Hunter's prosecution is entirely reasonable and could just as easily happen to a nobody.

But the big story here is not that Biden pardoned his son, but by doing so he is trying to hid his own guilt.

[BashiChuni]

9 minutes ago, Smokin said:

 

But the big story here is not that Biden pardoned his son, but by doing so he is trying to hid his own guilt.

nailed it.

hunter was simply the money guy for the "big guy"

also trump's "34 felonies" are 34 state misdemeanors whose statue of limitations had expired...which were upgraded to federal felonies in a unprecedented manner. biden DOJ top prosecutors left federal positions to join the NY state AG office (another unprecedented move), in order to oversee the political prosecution of Biden's political opponent.

those "felonies" aren't even felonies and were only upgraded by biden's corrupt DOJ. summary: pure political witch hunt.

read the marco polo report. biden crime family runs deep. and it will be exposed.

[BashiChuni]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/the-extraordinary-breadth-of-hunter-biden-s-pardon/ar-AA1v8I6w

 

"Biden didn’t just pardon his son for his convictions on tax and gun charges, but for any “offenses against the United States which he has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 1, 2014, through December 1, 2024.”

That’s a nearly 11-year period during which any federal crime Hunter Biden might have committed — and there are none we are aware of beyond what has already been adjudicated — can’t be prosecuted. It notably covers when he was appointed to the board of the Ukrainian energy company Burisma in 2014 all the way through Sunday, well after the crimes for which he was prosecuted."

[HeloDude]

On 8/9/2024 at 5:19 AM, Negatory said:

All of the arguments here the past couple of weeks:

 

It’s not that hard. Pick a new candidate and you’d have a chance. The Dems did it and are gonna win because of it. If Rs had gone Nikki Haley before Biden dropped out, this wouldn’t even be close. Trump can only win against a candidate at terrible as Biden.

Didn’t really pan out the way you said it would.