StoleIt Posted September 10 Posted September 10 On 9/9/2024 at 4:50 PM, Sua Sponte said: Name? Jacob Thornburg https://www.mcconnell.af.mil/News/Photos/igphoto/2003302230/
Sua Sponte Posted September 11 Posted September 11 4 hours ago, StoleIt said: Jacob Thornburg https://www.mcconnell.af.mil/News/Photos/igphoto/2003302230/ His LinkedIn still shows him as the Deputy of McConnell.
fire4effect Posted September 12 Posted September 12 15 hours ago, Biff_T said: Please say his call sign is GRETA. HOW DARE YOU!!!! 2
gearhog Posted November 8 Posted November 8 (edited) Oops... https://x.com/TaskandPurpose/status/1854722364895834495https://taskandpurpose.com/news/air-force-fires-commander-nuclear-missile/ https://x.com/TaskandPurpose/status/1854722364895834495 Edited November 8 by gearhog
MexicanHouseRULZ Posted November 13 Posted November 13 (edited) From the WSJ this morning: https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/trump-draft-executive-order-would-create-board-to-purge-generals-7ebaa606?st=Y7Njyd&reflink=article_copyURL_share I can think of a former AFSOC Sith Lord and his padawan that should be on the list. Edited November 13 by MexicanHouseRULZ
BashiChuni Posted November 13 Posted November 13 3 minutes ago, MexicanHouseRULZ said: From the WSJ this morning: https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/trump-draft-executive-order-would-create-board-to-purge-generals-7ebaa606?st=Y7Njyd&reflink=article_copyURL_share I can think of a former AFSOC Sith Lord and his padawan that should be on the list. From your lips to gods ears! 1
FourFans Posted November 13 Posted November 13 My brain has two points of view on this: First and foremost, any leadership involved specifically in the Afghanistan withdrawal should be keelhauled, then fired, and exempted from any mil-industrial complex jobs. Second, the concept of subjective and politically based "purging general officer leaders" should induce shivers and revulsion from anyone who has studied history. This will be messy. 1 8
BFM this Posted November 13 Posted November 13 Potentially a great thing. Could be a renaissance for defense leadership and mission focus. A witch hunt is equally possible, leading to a brain-drain that will take a generation to repair.
arg Posted November 13 Posted November 13 “The warrior board would be made up of retired generals and noncommissioned officers” retired chiefs get to plat too?
FourFans Posted November 14 Posted November 14 8 hours ago, arg said: “The warrior board would be made up of retired generals and noncommissioned officers” retired chiefs get to plat too? Wouldn't most of the ones that retired recently be focused on reflective belts? 2
Lord Ratner Posted November 14 Posted November 14 1 hour ago, FourFans said: Wouldn't most of the ones that retired recently be focused on reflective belts? There's no such thing as a chief that polices reflective belts without generals who tolerate such behavior. Anyways, witch hunt or not, you can't inflict this amount of rapid change without a tremendous amount of pain. Rip the bandaid off. 3
ClearedHot Posted November 14 Posted November 14 I know a retired General Officer who has already been approached about being on the board.
BashiChuni Posted November 14 Posted November 14 20 minutes ago, ClearedHot said: I know a retired General Officer who has already been approached about being on the board. me too. General Chang. 2 6
herkbum Posted November 14 Posted November 14 You can only say his name 1 more time before he shows upSent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now