Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

CSO select

98 pilot, 98 CSO, 86 pcsm w/o ppl (~12 hours). #1 Wing candidate and Wg strat as a group exec.

Sounds like it was a tough board this year. Congrats those that got it.

interested to see the final breakdown of career fields from those selected.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, takingamessage said:

Ditto. 

Same, if at all possible.

Been lurking a couple of weeks, but just got word that my commander intends to sit on the results until the 23rd.

Would really like to know before then..

Posted (edited)

In other news, why does the system of disseminating this type of information have to be so broken? Like I understand wanting to give supervisors the opportunity to inform applicants of results, but why do we need (in my case) 4 entities between AFPC and the unit CC/supervisor?

Edited by WannaBeAPilot442
  • Upvote 2
Posted
28 minutes ago, takingamessage said:

Non-select. 

86 Pilot, 76 PCSM. #1 Wing candidate, Wg/CC LOR, Wg strat and MAJCOM awards. Whatever the magic sauce was, guess I left it out. 

Congrats to everyone who got what they wanted! Go kick ass. 

 

@takingamessagehow did you find out? From following this thread sounds like you and I are in the same WG.

Posted
1 hour ago, AFZ06 said:

Well looks like I’m a non-select.

FWIW I’m a current E-3 FTU Nav 1,000+ hours, 96 pilot, 91 PCSM w/ppl #2 WG strat. 
 

AD can get bent. Time to start rushing Reserve/Guard units. 

Just so I’m getting some context you are already rated and (im assuming) only applied for Pilot correct? Those scores are stellar and I’m shocked you didn’t get picked with those scores. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Bean said:

Just so I’m getting some context you are already rated and (im assuming) only applied for Pilot correct? Those scores are stellar and I’m shocked you didn’t get picked with those scores. 

Yeah I’m also shocked. 😂 Extremely frustrating & disheartening. I am currently an E-3 Navigator so that falls under the “CSO” field. So I only applied for pilot. Literally chose this position over F-15 WSO out of NAV school because I thought it would be the quickest route to pilot. 
 

Second time non-select last year my AFOQT scores were P-74 PCSM - 76.

Im willing to bet I was selected but not released by my functional.

 

 

Posted
23 minutes ago, barakiel011 said:

UPT Non-Select

KC-135 Evaluator Navigator, over 2000 hrs MDS flying, 25 hours Civilian, no PPL, Wing #1 select

PCSM: 74 Pilot: 92

This was my 4th board

If you don’t mind me asking did you get an ETP? I thought you we’re only allowed to try two times max?

Posted (edited)

UPT non-select as well...200+ hours w/PPL, 95 pilot/90 PCSM, but from an very undermanned career field. Been on the guard/reserve road for awhile now with quite a few interviews and no dice. Alot of guard/reserve squadrons don't like to hire current (non-rated) AD officers is mostly the feedback I have gotten. The quest to fly continues!

Edited by Av8
Posted

Upt non-select, URT IP/MQ-9 LRE Pilot, 96 pilot 91 pcsm, ppl w/85hrs. Have a feeling it was due to manning my in career field. Congrats to all who got selected. 

On a different note, those who got RPA feel free to hit me up about bases, aircraft, training, liestyle, whatever. Especially since I'm pretty sure you'll put in your dream sheet and get your assignments prior to getting to me at randolph. 

Posted

Non-Select

87 PCSM
85 Pilot
PPL w/ 120 hrs

Congratulations to all that got selected, this was/is a tough year to apply!

Posted
16 hours ago, Bean said:

I thought you we’re only allowed to try two times max?

Just curious - is that something new?  Are you only allowed to apply twice?

I believe it used to be you could apply as many times as you wanted until you reached the max age or max total commissioned service time?

  • Upvote 1
Posted
42 minutes ago, Blue said:

Just curious - is that something new?  Are you only allowed to apply twice?

I believe it used to be you could apply as many times as you wanted until you reached the max age or max total commissioned service time?

I believe you are correct, I think @Bean may be referring to the fact that you can only apply once more if you declined something previously (i.e. wanted pilot but got CSO and declined CSO). Technically, I think you can apply as much as you want if you aren't selected for anything. However, it does raise an interesting point that it may be better to be selected for nothing than selected for something you don't want if you have a certain goal.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Av8 said:

I believe you are correct, I think @Bean may be referring to the fact that you can only apply once more if you declined something previously (i.e. wanted pilot but got CSO and declined CSO). Technically, I think you can apply as much as you want if you aren't selected for anything. However, it does raise an interesting point that it may be better to be selected for nothing than selected for something you don't want if you have a certain goal.

Sorry for the confusion but yes this situation is what I was referring to in my initial question.

On another note, for all those non-selects, are you all in rated career fields already? I’m speculating right now but it looks like the rated functionals are denying people releases when they could have been picked up for pilot with their high scores, total amount of flight time and PPLs. I’d be livid if I spent all my time/money into flying only to have a functional deny my release after the board met. 
 

If my logic is flawed please let me know!

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Bean said:

Sorry for the confusion but yes this situation is what I was referring to in my initial question.

On another note, for all those non-selects, are you all in rated career fields already? I’m speculating right now but it looks like the rated functionals are denying people releases when they could have been picked up for pilot with their high scores, total amount of flight time and PPLs. I’d be livid if I spent all my time/money into flying only to have a functional deny my release after the board met. 
 

If my logic is flawed please let me know!

I’m in a rated field and a non-select I thought that would be the case for me but nope. I emailed Chris this morning and I was simply not selected. Just outside the cut he said. 
 

Which is mind boggling judging by the amount of non-rated people chosen. It just doesn’t make sense they’d take someone with 0 airmanship and military flight time over someone that’s already proven & capable. I just don’t get it. 

My stats are E-3 FTU I-Nav, 1K+ hours, 96P/91PCSM, PPL, 3 deployments and they chose a non rate over me. 🥴

Edited by AFZ06
  • Confused 1
Posted

UPT non-select, Got RPA instead.

P 93, PCSM 82, 41 Flight Hours.

1st time applying. 

Most likely declining and waiting to make my package stronger. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, AFZ06 said:

I’m in a rated field and a non-select I thought that would be the case for me but nope. I emailed Chris this morning and I was simply not selected. Just outside the cut he said. 
 

Which is mind boggling judging by the amount of non-rated people chosen. It just doesn’t make sense they’d take someone with 0 airmanship and military flight time over someone that’s already proven & capable. I just don’t get it. 

My stats are E-3 FTU I-Nav, 1K+ hours, 96P/91PCSM, PPL, 3 deployments and they chose a non rate over me. 🥴

Yo, this is def BS.  Based on that score alone you should have gotten UPT.  Did you have a GO sign your package?  I hear it helps make a difference too. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...