Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, BrightNeptune said:

The latter. The mission broke me and I'm done. I've participated directly in ending many lives for no purpose. Those people could still be alive and there would be no difference. Who knows if they were even bad people. Showing up overhead just to waste a random dude that is no threat to you, your family, or your country takes it toll after you have been doing it for years on end.

You know the flashback scene in the third Bourne movie with Jason, his trainer, and a dude in the corner with a hood over his head and handcuffs? Jason was told to pick up the gun and shoot him. The trainer would not answer any questions. I picked up that gun and shot many people and watched them bleed out live and in high definition. I can't do that anymore. (No, I did not "fly" a drone, I was there overhead)

I'm pretty much at the end of my UPT ADSC and want out ASAP before these idiots in charge find a new way to sacrifice my life in order to give them a bullet on their next OPR.

I have yet to be convinced I need the vaccine, either. If I was a free man I would not get it until I am convinced that it will benefit me. I'm not a free man and there is now a gun to my head, so I guess I will be getting it shortly.
 

Fair enough, as a mobility guy I can't say I directly understand your struggles; I have helped carry an unfortunate amount of dead American SOF off the back of my airplane over the years and I'd be lying if I said that the last three weeks of events in Afghanistan have been easy for me to process either.  If you ever need someone to vent to please feel free to DM, I sincerely wish you the best wherever you land.  

  Unsolicited advice that you're free to disregard/ignore; don't end your time in the AF on a General or other than honorable discharge.  I think you'd regret it in the long run.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Lord Ratner said:

Found General Chang

It helps a lot to go under user settings and just block seeing his posts; keeps all these threads more coherent.  Also, if I could ask a favor, try not to quote that Martian, it complicates my own efforts to not see the garbage he posts.

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, pawnman said:

Chang was annoying, but at least he was coherent. 

>calls my posts incoherent because you’re too much of a mentally deficient loser to actually debate me and win

Why @pawnman “con”man?

Does anyone know if @DirkDiggler has Ligma? He can’t seem to ever stop talking about me.

Edited by dogfish78
Posted (edited)

At what point will the mods boot someone based on a large number of active members blocking all of their content?

That’s not a spear at the mods, it’s an actual question. What percent of active daily membership have to block someone before the troll gets bounced?

Edited by Boomer6
Posted
6 minutes ago, Guardian said:

At the point where Twitter takes over control over these forums

Invalid. PWB and the choads like him were sent packing, but Twitter let’s the taliban tweet.

Posted (edited)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VuouMqMkDrg57QEHd94nqYLGck8wFKdH/view?fbclid=IwAR1Vm7FonfF500oXe0zLZfnz8bHLB2JAwhlfLmcnDd9eqHBar0v-HOMgPtQ

USAF guidance on Covid vaccines.  Couple of things stuck out:

1. Your 16+ years of service may not be enough to keep you in until retirement if you refuse the vaccines

2. An established separation or retirement date doesn't exempt you from needing the vaccine

3. There will be no involuntary separation pay if you are separated for refusing the vaccine

4. Refusing the vaccine doesn't automatically get you out of your ADSC

5. If you took the bonus or are still on the hook for TA or other educational benefits, and you get kicked out, the Air Force will likely come after you for the "unearned" portion of the bonus and/or recoup the cost of the educational benefits.

6. The memo does not definitively state the characterization of a discharge for vaccine refusal, leaving that to individual commanders.

 

Edit: related, from a terrible screen grab:

You CAN be ordered to take the Pfizer vaccine.  No holding out for a label change to Comirnaty.

UX1bLMW6GXYxn4QYOziLoAzCRpXLFo9QOvtkWadb

Edited by pawnman
  • Downvote 2
Posted
39 minutes ago, BrightNeptune said:

From a friend through the rumor mill:

It seems at least one UPT student that is already flying complete but not graduated yet has refused the vaccine. What happens to them?

One possibility: He makes sure his logbook is properly filled out, get his military equivalency instrument and commercial ratings, gets a civilian job, does whatever he wants, marries a hot flight attendant or two, and lives happily ever after.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
Posted
One possibility: He makes sure his logbook is properly filled out, get his military equivalency instrument and commercial ratings, gets a civilian job, does whatever he wants, marries a hot flight attendant or two, and lives happily ever after.
And then get to the airlines and find that the airlines are requiring the vaccine as well.

Very refreshing to see that when Air Force leaders put their minds to it they can actually cover all their bases when it comes to strong-arming people into doing something. I just wish they'd use those talents in other places.
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, BrightNeptune said:

From a friend through the rumor mill:

It seems at least one UPT student that is already flying complete but not graduated yet has refused the vaccine. What happens to them?

“Thanks for your service. Here’s your DD-214.”

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted



One possibility: He makes sure his logbook is properly filled out, get his military equivalency instrument and commercial ratings, gets a civilian job, does whatever he wants, marries a hot flight attendant or two, and lives happily ever after.


He hasn't been winged yet, so the AF could opt to not wing him and deny him the pilot aeronautical rating, which means no mil-comp for commercial/instrument ratings.

Best case for him is the system is slow and he wings. Worst case is what I have above. Most likely is being put on admin hold and rolling a class or two while the commanders figure out what to do.
Posted
6 minutes ago, jazzdude said:


 

 


He hasn't been winged yet, so the AF could opt to not wing him and deny him the pilot aeronautical rating, which means no mil-comp for commercial/instrument ratings.

Best case for him is the system is slow and he wings. Worst case is what I have above. Most likely is being put on admin hold and rolling a class or two while the commanders figure out what to do.

 

According to the 19th AF/CC guidance we got in an email last week, said individual WILL be put on administrative hold pending a determination of his/her future in the service.  Whether the Bobs ultimately decide to wing him/her since according to the source he/she is syllabus complete I honestly couldn't say.

  • Like 1
Posted
According to the 19th AF/CC guidance we got in an email last week, said individual WILL be put on administrative hold pending a determination of his/her future in the service.  Whether the Bobs ultimately decide to wing him/her since according to the source he/she is syllabus complete I honestly couldn't say.
Wing him? Forgetabout it!.... they won't wing him. It'll be the ultimate sacrifice and they will have no problems throwing all of that money away to make an example out of him.
  • Like 1
Posted
17 hours ago, DirkDiggler said:

According to the 19th AF/CC guidance we got in an email last week, said individual WILL be put on administrative hold pending a determination of his/her future in the service.  Whether the Bobs ultimately decide to wing him/her since according to the source he/she is syllabus complete I honestly couldn't say.

Why would they wing someone right before administratively separating them? I'd be surprised.

 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Lord Ratner said:

Why would they wing someone right before administratively separating them? I'd be surprised.

 

I think he should argue that he successfully completed the training, and met all the preexisting conditions and standards to be designated an Air Force pilot. It wasn't until after he met those requirements that the vaccine was mandated, and even then, it isn't a condition for being a pilot, just for staying in.

Even still, I'd also be surprised. It's probably a rare situation and the risk of blowback for denying him wings isn't enough for Wing leadership to care about. Unless they're a Gen Milley, they're going to tow the line.

  • Upvote 1
Posted



I think he should argue that he successfully completed the training, and met all the preexisting conditions and standards to be designated an Air Force pilot. It wasn't until after he met those requirements that the vaccine was mandated, and even then, it isn't a condition for being a pilot, just for staying in.
Even still, I'd also be surprised. It's probably a rare situation and the risk of blowback for denying him wings isn't enough for Wing leadership to care about. Unless they're a Gen Milley, they're going to tow the line.


Would you make this argument if said student got RPAs, completed the syllabus, then DOR'd right before graduation?
  • Upvote 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, torqued said:

I think he should argue that he successfully completed the training, and met all the preexisting conditions and standards to be designated an Air Force pilot. It wasn't until after he met those requirements that the vaccine was mandated, and even then, it isn't a condition for being a pilot, just for staying in.

Even still, I'd also be surprised. It's probably a rare situation and the risk of blowback for denying him wings isn't enough for Wing leadership to care about. Unless they're a Gen Milley, they're going to tow the line.

You are trying to use way too much common sense here.  They will not wing him.  The pilot shortage is a crisis of the past.  

Posted
18 minutes ago, Lord Ratner said:

Why would they wing someone right before administratively separating them? I'd be surprised.

 

Don’t know, honestly think it could be Wg/CC and timing dependent but I’m speculating, the email didn’t go into any more specifics.  I also don’t have even close to the full story on this so any guess I make as to 19th/AF and AETC’s actions would be just a guess.
  Personal opinion, if the guy completed the syllabus, was just waiting on graduation and I was wing king I’d let him wing with his class; I wouldn’t see that as being tied to the vaccine refusal.  
 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, jazzdude said:


Would you make this argument if said student got RPAs, completed the syllabus, then DOR'd right before graduation?

This case might be different. If someone DOR'd before graduation, they've effectively ended it.

I don't know the details of this one, but the student has finished flying so graduation should be before the official deadline of Nov 2.

If this student were smart, he'd remain passively non-compliant until after he's winged.

Posted
1 minute ago, torqued said:

This case might be different. If someone DOR'd before graduation, they've effectively ended it.

I don't know the details of this one, but the student has finished flying so graduation should be before the official deadline of Nov 2.

If this student were smart, he'd remain passively non-compliant until after he's winged.

You know the easy way out to a lot of people's hesitation to the new mRNA-type vaccines would be to just get the J&J jab and be done with it.  It's an adenovirus vaccine.  The technology has been around and been used since the 1970's in many other vaccinations.  Get the J&J, get it in your military medical records as having a COVID shot and be done with it.

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1
Posted
Just now, TheNewGazmo said:

You know the easy way out to a lot of people's hesitation to the new mRNA-type vaccines would be to just get the J&J jab and be done with it.  It's an adenovirus vaccine.  The technology has been around and been used since the 1970's in many other vaccinations.  Get the J&J, get it in your military medical records as having a COVID shot and be done with it.

That's a compromise I'm sure a lot of people would be willing to make. Is J&J authorized to meet the mandate requirement?

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, torqued said:

That's a compromise I'm sure a lot of people would be willing to make. Is J&J authorized to meet the mandate requirement?

It was 6-8 months ago for us in the Guard.  They told everyone that if they got a COVID vaccine off base at a local pharmacy to make sure it got into our records.  I do know that Walgreens' system talks to ASIMS. Is the DoD mandating the Pfizer shot even for people who've already gotten the J&J?  I know quite a few people in my unit who opted for the J&J last Spring.

My only concern is that when I got the Pfizer through Walgreens, ASIMS flagged me due for a second one.  It just comes up as "COVID-19" so ASIMS may in fact not be smart enough to recognize the difference between the one-shot or the two.

Edited by TheNewGazmo
Posted
8 minutes ago, torqued said:

That's a compromise I'm sure a lot of people would be willing to make. Is J&J authorized to meet the mandate requirement?

Any of the vaccines meet the mandate requirement; DoD can only force you to take Pfizer since that’s the only FDA approved one.  Got two guys in my class that got the J&J off base and they’re green as far the military is concerned.

  • Upvote 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...