Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 minutes ago, Mark1 said:

Holy. Fucking. Shit.

You read that line and said to yourself, 'there it is right there'?

I misunderstood what we were dealing with here.  I thought it was somebody who was happy to turn a blind eye and go along with anything if it happened to support a bias of theirs. Upon closer inspection it's not willful ignorance, but substandard cognitive and comprehension ability.  My mistake, bless your heart.

You, specifically, are good to continue reading only the first paragraph of Slaynews articles.  Carry on.

i think you were looking for this

YARN | You are literally too stupid to insult. | The Hangover (2009) |  Video clips by quotes | 99ed8fd7 | 紗

Posted
4 hours ago, Sim said:

Dude it's this kind of crap that totally undermines your position. 
 

1. slaynews.com  wow a real bastion of reputable journalism there.  Totally not  clickbait garbage at the bottom of an OAN page

2. article links to a CDC study and then wholesale misrepresents what the study says. Which you would know if you had clicked the link and read the source material. 
 

What the CDC study actually says: a new variant of covid has a higher potential to infect people who've had the shot or who have ever had a covid infection

So no, it isn't a question of vaxxed vs unvaxxed. It's higher for anyone who has had any immune response to anything covid related before be that a shot or a previous variant.. which is as near as makes no difference the entire US population. 

I love how we're the ones that are supposed to eat crow while you guys conduct a bi-weekly circle jerk to whatever bias-confirming dumpster clickbait you can find.

Posted

Also I learned today that @Sim does trust CDC findings, but only when (he thinks) they line up with what he already believes. 
 

Next week on Magnificent Displays of Critical Thinking: a soccer player collapsed in Greece, do we all have myocarditis?!

Posted

Covid's gay!  

That is all. 

  • Haha 2
  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Biff_T said:

Covid's gay!  

That is all. 

Yep, and Jill Biden has it, as does Whooopie Goldb.  It's already started folks, it might be entertaining to see who comes out with it next.  Get on the bandwagon while you can, it's going to be a frolicking good COVID Halloween!  (Coming to an election near you).

Posted (edited)

Replace everything Covid related with the word gay.  It will make your day a little better.  Lol

Edit: and if you're gay, it will make your day a little gayer lol

Edit 2: "Did you get gay last winter?  A bunch people I know from the office got gay.  I sure hope I don't catch gay again, it hurt last time".  Dude at office

"I hear the gay shot makes you sick and it doesn't even stop you from getting gay."  Rachel Maddow MSNBC

"I support your right to wear a mask if you're scared of getting that nasty new gay variant."  A.P. Hill CSA

Lol

Edited by Biff_T
Spelling bee failure
  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)

Apparently we learned nothing in the past 3 years.  Fun fact refreshers:

- According to Johns Hopkins It takes 5-10 years to completely develop and study a vaccine.  History tells us it take longer then that.  Logic says it takes 20 years to do a 20 year study on the 20 year impact of a vaccine....weird.  It's been 3 since this show all started.  

- Modern news agencies exist to do one thing: Make Money...which they do by getting us to click...which they do by posting scary stories.

- Politicians want a crisis during an election.  This should shock no one.  Stop feeding into the real enemy's game (politicians trying to polarize their bases).  They don't care about you, they just want to retain or gain power.

Everyone chill out.

Frankly, I think @Biff_T has the right line here.  Can we somehow link the word replacement game with a drinking game?

Edited by FourFans
  • Like 1
  • Upvote 3
Posted

Honestly who cares. Individuals can do whatever they want WRT masks, vax, etc. If anything, the masks serve as a high probable ID criteria for all the idiots out there who haven’t learned a damn thing in the last 3.69 years. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

The only way I'm wearing a mask again is if it's a leather one and I happen to be with 6 LBFMs somewhere in Asia.  

Or outside at the bus stop lol

 

Posted

 

54 minutes ago, Biff_T said:

The only way I'm wearing a mask again is if it's a leather one and I happen to be with 6 LBFMs somewhere in Asia.  

Or outside at the bus stop lol

 

Screen Shot 2023-09-03 at 11.31.05 AM.pngI’d wear those bikini bottoms as a mask…I believe you said, in another thread, you wanted to keep talking about her. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, O Face said:

 

Screen Shot 2023-09-03 at 11.31.05 AM.pngI’d wear those bikini bottoms as a mask…I believe you said, in another thread, you wanted to keep talking about her. 

That is correct.   

Mask AFI Change 1

Chng 1. Biff will also partake in hot chick bikini bottom masks, especially Salma's!  

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, Biff_T said:

That is correct.   

Mask AFI Change 1

Chng 1. Biff will also partake in hot chick bikini bottom masks, especially Salma's!  

Just for you brother - I’d let you take the bottoms, and I’d wrap those sweet DD, Covid-proof, cannonball containers around my head all day.  I’d like to have 2 weeks in attempt to flatten her curves. image.gif.1c672082aacba1581fd3c7b519e2ec93.gif

Edited by O Face
!!
  • Upvote 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Biff_T said:

That is correct.   

Mask AFI Change 1

Chng 1. Biff will also partake in hot chick bikini bottom masks, especially Salma's!  

Sorta related … we had a dude get banned from flying with ma delta during the height of mask silliness for wearing a ladies thong as a mask. He was a frequent traveler, and wore panties as a mask … which was evidently just fine …. But the thong didn’t have enough coverage. 

Posted
16 hours ago, O Face said:

Just for you brother - I’d let you take the bottoms, and I’d wrap those sweet DD, Covid-proof, cannonball containers around my head all day.  I’d like to have 2 weeks in attempt to flatten her curves. image.gif.1c672082aacba1581fd3c7b519e2ec93.gif

@O Face Thanks kindly sir, you are a gentleman.  Hat's tipped and monocle wink. 

On another note.  Take a look at Clooney's face in this scene.  She just crop dusted him and he loved it. 😆 

 

@HossHarris , @brabus

I'm still pissed about this. It was total BS, it covered more of my face than those granny panties i typically wore.  My attorneys are fighting Mr. Bastian about this one.   It's still not over.  Until then, I'll bum rides with NK, they let me wear/do pretty much anything i want.  

 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Biff_T said:

On another note.  Take a look at Clooney's face in this scene.  She just crop dusted him and he loved it. 😆 

HAHA!  I didn’t notice anyone else was in the room, but that is a case of pinkeye  that I’d be super proud of. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
Quote

According to the whistleblower, at the end of its review, six of the seven members of the Team believed the intelligence and science were sufficient to make a low confidence assessment that COVID-19 originated from a laboratory in Wuhan, China. The seventh member of the Team, who also happened to be the most senior, was the lone officer to believe COVID-19 originated through zoonosis. The whistleblower further contends that to come to the eventual public determination of uncertainty, the other six members were given a significant monetary incentive to change their position.

https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2023-09/CIA Whistleblower on COVID origins 9.12.23.pdf

 

Not sure if this belongs in WTF thread or this one. 

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
3 hours ago, BashiChuni said:

God damn did this Covid narrative absolutely collapse. You Covid freaks are backpedaling so fast!

While ironically acknowledging my stupidity for bothering to engage you on this...your stupidity is tiresome.

When a person is infected by a SARS virus they have an immune response.  In a small number of cases that immune response has collateral impacts on the body.

When a person is vaccinated against a SARS virus they have [functionally] the same immune response. In a small number of cases that immune response has collateral impacts on the body.  Sound familiar? The difference being that they are not also under threat of a replicating virus that can overwhelm the body's ability to defend itself.

It's no surprise to thinking people that the same increase in risk of cardiac inflammation that comes with infection also comes with vaccination. It would be surprising if that was not the case given that, from the immune system's perspective, vaccination is indistinguishable from infection (with a few links in the response chain bypassed by mRNA).

The only question then is does the overall reduction in risk through vaccination outweigh that of exposing 'everyone' to the collateral immune response risk when a small portion of them may otherwise avoid ever being exposed to viral infection.  And the answer is yes...by orders of magnitude. Thankfully the people employed to come to these conclusions are typically not exceptionally vulnerable to tribal group-think conspiracy movements, and they base their conclusions on reality.

You may now return to wasting your life away by willfully sifting through all the wrong information in order to find the next trump-card that isn't a trump-card.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 10

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...