Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
For years 11-202 said do not consume alcohol within 12 hours of takeoff and I REALLY wanted to press to test this and see what happens if you never take the plane off..... Think they eventually fixed that glitch though....

Bottle to throttle? That’s why we have autothrottles!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
I mean I sign for the airplane, shake the stick, and pull the trigger…that’s real enough for me BQZip’s mom thought it felt real enough for her too…

Real enough for you. Not real enough for anyone else. Be honest, at best you’re an RPA operator.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted (edited)

Gawd damn some of y’all are triggered rn 😂

Every comment telling an RPA pilot “yOu’Re NoT a ReAl PiLoT” makes your dick 1 inch shorter, that’s also a fact. Some of you may need to limit your comments to only a couple before you go into negative territory…

In other news…what was this thread about again?

image.thumb.jpeg.9d9b20a550909bff821c8ee509f2a8b3.jpeg

Edited by nsplayr
  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
Posted
Gawd damn some of y’all are triggered rn
Every comment telling an RPA pilot “yOu’Re NoT a ReAl PiLoT” makes your dick 1 inch shorter, that’s also a fact. Some of you may need to limit your comments to only a couple before you go into negative territory…
In other news…what was this thread about again?
image.thumb.jpeg.9d9b20a550909bff821c8ee509f2a8b3.jpeg

Just kind of the equivalent of a biological male or female saying that they are the opposite gender or no gender at all.

Not triggered. Facts matter. And no matter how hard someone wants facts to be otherwise, they won’t change.
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 3
Posted

Call me some Gen Z commie pinko beta cuck but you can call yourself Indiana Jones for all I care if you find and fix targets and then put weapons on target, on time.  

  • Upvote 1
Posted
2 hours ago, nsplayr said:

Every comment telling an RPA pilot “yOu’Re NoT a ReAl PiLoT” makes your dick 1 inch shorter, that’s also a fact.

Oh well, down to 11" it is...

Bro it was a simple joke, nothing to get your labia wrapped around.

Posted
24 minutes ago, ClearedHot said:

Oh well, down to 11" it is...

Bro it was a simple joke, nothing to get your labia wrapped around.

#LipsThatGrip 😉

Posted
13 hours ago, ClearedHot said:

Oh well, down to 11" it is...

Bro it was a simple joke, nothing to get your labia wrapped around.

 

these-go-to-11.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
6 hours ago, Sim said:

Anybody with half a brain knew that would be the case.  Of course a decision this momentous has to come from the president.  But the current president looked right in the camera and lied about it, and some people here on this board are actually OK with that.  

  • Upvote 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Sim said:

And the DNC fanboys on here will parse words and generate another excuse for "The Big Guy."  We look like a banana republic.

  • Upvote 3
Posted

It’s not political weaponziation CH, it’s doing the right thing IAW the law, why can’t you just let bygones be bygones and support justice now!  Oh wait….uhhhh, yeah, uhhhh, I’ll get back to you after I format my “well what she meant to say was…” answer.

Posted
5 hours ago, Sua Sponte said:

 

Weird...

Quote

From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.
Source: https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

 

Posted
9 minutes ago, StoleIt said:

Weird...

 

Dude, do you even arithmetic? It’s obvious that all adds up to “ZERO”

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, brabus said:

WTF is she talking about? TS//SAR was found on her server. That twitter statement is a 100% lie.

Doesn't matter because she is a democrat and they only want justice going forward from this point...unless of course it has to do with Hunter's laptop.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
Posted

When Trump and his supporters say the election was stolen it’s anti-democracy, fascism, etc…but when the Dems say an election was stolen, well then that’s different.

“White House Press Secretary Called Out for Saying Trump ‘Stole’ 2016 Election“

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/white-house-press-secretary-called-out-for-saying-trump-stole-2016-election/?fbclid=IwAR1DySUnay0jMN9T1CJWQMq6qMuHGUbT5tO-0qlqL-nCbuAYxGZo4RCflhU&fs=e&s=cl

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted
On 9/6/2022 at 7:40 PM, tac airlifter said:

some people here on this board are actually OK with that.  

“What do you mean some people?” - those ppl, probably 

In all seriousness I’m actually interested to hear the response to this news from the non-conservatives on here.

Posted
10 hours ago, HeloDude said:

When Trump and his supporters say the election was stolen it’s anti-democracy, fascism, etc…but when the Dems say an election was stolen, well then that’s different.

“White House Press Secretary Called Out for Saying Trump ‘Stole’ 2016 Election“

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/white-house-press-secretary-called-out-for-saying-trump-stole-2016-election/?fbclid=IwAR1DySUnay0jMN9T1CJWQMq6qMuHGUbT5tO-0qlqL-nCbuAYxGZo4RCflhU&fs=e&s=cl

She was called out by Peter Doocy and at first she interrupted him, then allowed him to continue.  Her response looks like it was written for Pravda:

"Well, here we go," Doocy responded. "You tweeted Trump stole an election. You tweeted Brian Kemp stole an election. If denying election results is extreme now, why wasn't it then?"

"Let's be really clear: That comparison you just made is ridiculous," Jean-Pierre said, adding that she was speaking specifically about voting rights at the time.

 

Posted
She was called out by Peter Doocy and at first she interrupted him, then allowed him to continue.  Her response looks like it was written for Pravda:
"Well, here we go," Doocy responded. "You tweeted Trump stole an election. You tweeted Brian Kemp stole an election. If denying election results is extreme now, why wasn't it then?"
"Let's be really clear: That comparison you just made is ridiculous," Jean-Pierre said, adding that she was speaking specifically about voting rights at the time.
 


I thought of this thread when I saw this reported yesterday. She can’t respond to anything without referencing her notebook. A Press Secretary should be able to address at least some portion of topics extemporaneously.


Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app
  • Like 2
Posted
44 minutes ago, herkbum said:

I thought of this thread when I saw this reported yesterday. She can’t respond to anything without referencing her notebook. A Press Secretary should be able to address at least some portion of topics extemporaneously.

She learned it from Circle Back Jenn...it is not just referencing the notebook, it is getting the exact phrasing of their prepared response.  What is truly sad is even the prepared remarks fail, usually on the grounds of being lies or tone deaf.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...