gearhog Posted May 28 Posted May 28 (edited) Hope they got out. What aircraft? EDIT: Looks like they did. "Pilot is being attended to." https://www.facebook.com/KOBTV/videos/2425143644345871 Edited May 28 by gearhog 1
DirkDiggler Posted May 28 Posted May 28 On first glance wreckage didn’t look like anything assigned to the 58 SOW. Glad the guy got out.
Swizzle Posted May 28 Posted May 28 https://theaviationist.com/2024/05/28/f-35-crashes-near-albuquerque-new-mexico/
McJay Pilot Posted May 28 Posted May 28 It was wild looking out the briefing room windows and seeing the smoke plume. Made for an interesting day prior brief though! 1
McJay Pilot Posted May 29 Posted May 29 News is saying it was a tail on its way from factory to be delivered and it was a contractor pilot. We always picked up our hercs from the factory. Any pointy nose guys care to weigh in?
Skitzo Posted May 29 Posted May 29 News is saying it was a tail on its way from factory to be delivered and it was a contractor pilot. We always picked up our hercs from the factory. Any pointy nose guys care to weigh in?Somewhere a GFR is crapping his or her pants. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
brabus Posted May 29 Posted May 29 2 hours ago, McJay Pilot said: News is saying it was a tail on its way from factory to be delivered and it was a contractor pilot. We always picked up our hercs from the factory. Any pointy nose guys care to weigh in? We have the option of getting it ourselves or someone from Fort Worth delivering. 1
contraildash Posted May 29 Posted May 29 Wonder if he took off that way or was trying to land that way (after some T/O issue) guess we'll have to wait... In either case I don't get it. I've seen a few F-35Bs depart various airfields in person (to include ABQ) and their penchant for doing VSTOL takeoffs never make sense to me. Especially at a high/hot airport such as ABQ, even with 2x 10,000+ runways. Curious if it is a TOLD thing or just preference.
FourFans Posted May 29 Posted May 29 1 hour ago, contraildash said: Curious if it is a TOLD thing or just preference. I remember watching Harriers doing partial down vectored takeoffs routinely at Kandahar as well. Always puzzled me as the airfield should have been plenty long enough. I would speculate it's a procedural thing. 1
brabus Posted May 30 Posted May 30 (edited) It’s an approved procedure, but also not required on “standard length” runways. Seen plenty of B model conventional takeoffs during normal ops. Edited May 30 by brabus
Lord Ratner Posted May 30 Posted May 30 Leave it to the Jack-of-all-trades Marine Corp to design an MWS that is a plane, a helicopter, and a JDAM all in one unaffordable package. They really are the America's Swiss army knife! 3 1
Swizzle Posted May 30 Posted May 30 (edited) Plot thickens...was an AF pilot... https://www.airandspaceforces.com/air-force-pilot-f-35b-crash-kirtland/ Edited May 30 by Swizzle For DCMA. I like how article says they're qualified in all three variants, but infer the B's STOVL is easy by only flipping a lever in the cockpit. As Emeril would say, "BAAM!" Pretty sure it's not THAT easy.
Prosuper Posted May 30 Posted May 30 STOVL systems have way too many moving parts, just like helicopters, if one part fails the damn thing crashes.
SocialD Posted May 30 Posted May 30 6 hours ago, Swizzle said: Plot thickens...was an AF pilot... https://www.airandspaceforces.com/air-force-pilot-f-35b-crash-kirtland/ If I remember correctly, the one that crashed at NFW was an AF guy as well. For his sake, hope it's not the same guy. 1 ejection per career is bad enough. 2
StoleIt Posted May 30 Posted May 30 (edited) Video of the incident. My take away, dang, really everything these days is caught on camera. Plan accordingly. Edited May 30 by StoleIt
VMFA187 Posted May 31 Posted May 31 On 5/28/2024 at 5:11 PM, McJay Pilot said: News is saying it was a tail on its way from factory to be delivered and it was a contractor pilot. We always picked up our hercs from the factory. Any pointy nose guys care to weigh in? We do some of the delivery pilots periodic training and I've heard some of the other CIPs mention occasionally that there was quite a bit of color in the events.
Danger41 Posted May 31 Posted May 31 Minor thread derail here but for Navy carrier based airplanes, is there something in the TO's that state you have to do every landing like you're attacking the runway? Or is it just a "practice like you play" kind of thing how you would land on the carrier?
brabus Posted June 1 Posted June 1 A retired hornet bro referencing Delta training, “flaring is so stupid.” From what my navy friends have said, it’s SOP to set a decent rate (700 FPM?) and ride it in, every time. It does make sense to not have two different landing procedures based on carrier vs. no carrier - guys would probably fuck up and accidentally flare at the boat and miss the wire…and then their entire career is over and they might as well kill themselves because you know, admin is more important than combat capability! #gONaVy! 3 1
Swizzle Posted June 1 Posted June 1 10 hours ago, brabus said: A retired hornet bro referencing Delta training, “flaring is so stupid. // // #gONaVy! Easy to say flaring is stupid when your landing gear struts are built like artillery barrels. Also in a normal approach to landing, or come-down, does that mean Navy bro's lay some rigorous pipe atop their shipmates aboard? 3
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now