Trump's Cabinet

[SurelySerious]

If you really think he did that with no reasons you’re a historical retard. Truly. 
 
 

Your “interpretation” of “history” is the mentally deficient part. There were no hostilities, and then someone initiated hostilities…who started shooting and taking another country’s land? Oh, right. It was Putin.

[Lord Ratner]

7 hours ago, disgruntledemployee said:

Just because a prosecutor declines charges doesn't always mean it didn't happen.

Does anyone know WHY the DOJ chose not to prosecute Gaetz?  Perp's status?  Poor/incomplete investigation?  Procescutor bias?  Victim cooperation?  Facts/witnesses sufficient to convince a jury?  Politicians making deals to hold leverage? P. Diddy?  Epstein/Trump connections? Aliens?

Rhetorically, why doesn't Trump do his homework and pick someone who isn’t under investigation and maybe have some quals in justice? 

PS. Those last 3 excuses are sarcasm.

Innocent. Until. Proven. Guilty. 

 

If you have some evidence you would like us to consider, share it. 

 

Unless *you* know why the DOJ didn't prosecute Gaetz, why waste everyone's time with hypotheticals?

[BashiChuni]

3 hours ago, SurelySerious said:

Your “interpretation” of “history” is the mentally deficient part. There were no hostilities, and then someone initiated hostilities…who started shooting and taking another country’s land? Oh, right. It was Putin.

you are a simpleton. learn some context and history. ukraine isn't nato.

[SurelySerious]

you are a simpleton. learn some context and history. ukraine isn't nato.

uKrAiNe IsNt NaTo

Your only line, and I’m the simpleton. No, I read the history, that’s how I know there was no aggression justifying an invasion of a sovereign nation.

[Negatory]

7 hours ago, Lord Ratner said:

Innocent. Until. Proven. Guilty. 

 

If you have some evidence you would like us to consider, share it. 

 

Unless *you* know why the DOJ didn't prosecute Gaetz, why waste everyone's time with hypotheticals?

Yes! Preach gurl!

Very. Important. Points. With. Periods. We. Totally. Consider. Evidence. On. This. Forum. So. It’s. Worth. Your. Time. To. Present. It. To. The. Group.

And most importantly, even if convicted of 34 felonies, still innocent!

It’s called cognitive dissonance people!

[gearhog]

7 hours ago, SurelySerious said:

uKrAiNe IsNt NaTo

Your only line, and I’m the simpleton. No, I read the history, that’s how I know there was no aggression justifying an invasion of a sovereign nation.

If you like your invasions justified, I have some history you'll enjoy reading.

 

[Stoker]

10 hours ago, Lord Ratner said:

Innocent. Until. Proven. Guilty. 

Sure, in a court of law. Not a job application or the court of public opinion. Would you let Gaetz date your daughter?

[SurelySerious]

If you like your invasions justified, I have some history you'll enjoy reading.
 

Yep, although it did lead to one of the great satires of all time:

[Majestik Møøse]

Bashi, you’re a coward and fool for supporting Russia and an embarrassment to have in the US military. It’s bad enough that I have to assume you’re a troll. Good day.

[BashiChuni]

30 minutes ago, Majestik Møøse said:

Bashi, you’re a coward and fool for supporting Russia and an embarrassment to have in the US military. It’s bad enough that I have to assume you’re a troll. Good day.

i'm not supporting them you DOLT!

there are circumstances that the US/NATO have done since 2014 that have lead to Russia deciding to invade.

being blind to historical foreign policy won't magically make the russians go away. don't be manipulated like a fool

[BashiChuni]

9 hours ago, SurelySerious said:

uKrAiNe IsNt NaTo

Your only line, and I’m the simpleton. No, I read the history, that’s how I know there was no aggression justifying an invasion of a sovereign nation.

it's a fact. they are not nato and we should not be supporting them.

if you read history tell me what the US promised Russia in the early 1990s? you think the US would stand for Canada joining a Chinese military alliance?

the level of stupidity that some of you "officers" have is mindblowing.

[SurelySerious]

it's a fact. they are not nato and we should not be supporting them.
if you read history tell me what the US promised Russia in the early 1990s? you think the US would stand for Canada joining a Chinese military alliance?
the level of stupidity that some of you "officers" have is mindblowing.

One can only support a nation in duress if they are obligated by a treaty: the opinion of a simpleton troll.

Glad you’re not an officer and just an online Putin simp.

[HeloDude]

42 minutes ago, Majestik Møøse said:

Bashi, you’re a coward and fool for supporting Russia and an embarrassment to have in the US military. It’s bad enough that I have to assume you’re a troll. Good day.

Here’s something for you—you can be against spending hundreds of billions of dollars in support of Ukraine while also not being supportive of Russia.

[BashiChuni]

24 minutes ago, SurelySerious said:

One can only support a nation in duress if they are obligated by a treaty: the opinion of a simpleton troll.

Glad you’re not an officer and just an online Putin simp.

glad you're a warmongering cuck who blindly supports the flag officer/politician class...and who will always "jump" when someone says "war". sad to see.

korea, vietnam, all the cia coups, GWOT failures...none of that matters to you. You're ALWAYS doing the right thing spreading that american democracy around the globe. WW3? nah. don't be a pussy. it's gonna be FINE shooting american made weapons inside russian territory. putin isn't really serious about any of his red lines. oh you have reservations about that? YOU MUST BE SUPPORTING PUTIN WHAT A SIMP! /s

[Majestik Møøse]

Social media has destroyed your mind, good luck