FourFans Posted Friday at 01:46 PM Posted Friday at 01:46 PM 1 hour ago, Sua Sponte said: https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/no-surprise-here-source-close-to-desantis-says-he-wont-appoint-gaetz-to-rubios-senate-seat/amp/ standby for inputs from daddy Don 1
Smokin Posted Friday at 02:34 PM Posted Friday at 02:34 PM 2 hours ago, ClearedHot said: As of 2024 we are down 61% from our heyday. Fortunately we are still self-sufficient but if Putin wins I guess we could thumb our nose at Europe and just feed ourselves, but prices will soar and it will impact every American's pocket. Our national debt is obviously a huge concern and probably the biggest threat to our country, but when making decisions in a globally connected world/economy we have to think about the 2nd and 3rd order effects. True, wheat prices would jump considerably, but would recover for the next harvest season. We're still paying farmers not to farm and many of the midwest's most productive farms are growing corn to turn into gas rather than feed people. There is considerable excess production available and that's not even considering some of the greenbelt acreages that could be farmed productively but are basically just hayed for the tax savings. If people thought prices would continue to stay high, many of those greenbelt people would jump off the sideline and start leasing to nearby farmers.
disgruntledemployee Posted Friday at 04:08 PM Author Posted Friday at 04:08 PM 1 hour ago, Smokin said: True, wheat prices would jump considerably, but would recover for the next harvest season. We're still paying farmers not to farm and many of the midwest's most productive farms are growing corn to turn into gas rather than feed people. There is considerable excess production available and that's not even considering some of the greenbelt acreages that could be farmed productively but are basically just hayed for the tax savings. If people thought prices would continue to stay high, many of those greenbelt people would jump off the sideline and start leasing to nearby farmers. Did you grow up on a grain farm? Do you know how easy/hard it is to flip crops like this? Equipment? TTPs? 1
disgruntledemployee Posted Friday at 04:13 PM Author Posted Friday at 04:13 PM 4 hours ago, ClearedHot said: Wanna bet? I predicted his nomination to AG. I now predict he is appointed to replace Rubio. I think the appointment is for 2 years and then it goes back to an election. Now all Ron has to do is not sell it like Blagojevich did.
Sua Sponte Posted Friday at 04:51 PM Posted Friday at 04:51 PM Gaetz announced he’s not rejoining Congress within the next year. 1
Smokin Posted Saturday at 04:41 PM Posted Saturday at 04:41 PM On 11/22/2024 at 9:08 AM, disgruntledemployee said: Did you grow up on a grain farm? Do you know how easy/hard it is to flip crops like this? Equipment? TTPs? Physically resided on a farm? No, but my family does have a farm where I spend a fair amount of time and has switched 3 crops in the last 5 years, so yes, I have an idea. If there is a potential to double the income, farmers will figure it out.
di1630 Posted Sunday at 03:03 AM Posted Sunday at 03:03 AM Did you grow up on a grain farm? Do you know how easy/hard it is to flip crops like this? Equipment? TTPs?There is a glut of wheat in the world and prices are super low for the grower while costs spiral up. I run a wheat farm, if anyone wants to know the market and gripes of farmers, I’ll give em. A bushel of wheat in 1960 went for about ~$2. Today I can sell mine for about $6. 1960 $2 = $20+ today. Now crops back then yielded about 1/2 of what they do now but the fertilizer cost to achieve that is outrageous control. Farmers produce more, drive down costs, then are forced to produce more due to thin margins. Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app
brabus Posted Sunday at 03:23 AM Posted Sunday at 03:23 AM @arg That’s not comforting. I hope she is directly asked about red flag laws and the age restriction thing - if her answer is anything other than, “I was wrong and those should not exist,” time to can her ass and make the 3rd pick.
arg Posted Sunday at 07:06 AM Posted Sunday at 07:06 AM 3 hours ago, di1630 said: There is a glut of wheat in the world and prices are super low for the grower while costs spiral up. I run a wheat farm, if anyone wants to know the market and gripes of farmers, I’ll give em. A bushel of wheat in 1960 went for about ~$2. Today I can sell mine for about $6. 1960 $2 = $20+ today. Now crops back then yielded about 1/2 of what they do now but the fertilizer cost to achieve that is outrageous control. Farmers produce more, drive down costs, then are forced to produce more due to thin margins. Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app Similar. In 1972 you could sell cattle and buy a new 1972 pickup. In 2024 you can sell cattle and buy a 1972 pickup. 2
Sua Sponte Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1860574377013838033?s=46&t=ctjFB6W6EEwuK5d_y4et5g
Lord Ratner Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 1 hour ago, Sua Sponte said: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1860574377013838033?s=46&t=ctjFB6W6EEwuK5d_y4et5g I've said this here before. The "AI" that exists currently is sufficient to make an anti air missile that is inescapable by any existing aircraft. I'm guessing Anduril or Palantir are already working on this, but in the end the human G limitation will make it impossible for a manned aircraft to escape this technology. There is a reason we are so aggressively blocking China from obtaining any of nvidia's most advanced chips. It won't matter, the processing power required for these models is already plummeting, and older video cards are capable much more than just a year or two ago. It does make me wonder if we will see a return to guns as a primary anti-aircraft weapon. Creating an unmanned fighter that is capable of out-maneuvering whatever plane it is following and responding faster than any human can would make it relatively easy to get within range of a target and use cheap bullets to take it out. Reusable anti-aircraft drones would be a better value proposition than blowing up $100k in processing power with every launch. It's going to be an interesting decade ahead.
uhhello Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 4 hours ago, Sua Sponte said: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1860574377013838033?s=46&t=ctjFB6W6EEwuK5d_y4et5g Getting a bit out over yer' skis bud 1
Smokin Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago Agreed. I like the idea of Musk rolling in and chopping heads, but platforms that we have literally built our national security plans around probably needs a bit deeper look. Cameras are great, until it's cloudy...
SurelySerious Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago Agreed. I like the idea of Musk rolling in and chopping heads, but platforms that we have literally built our national security plans around probably needs a bit deeper look. Cameras are great, until it's cloudy...You fly when it’s cloudy?
Boomer6 Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago Who needs SAMs or sophisticated drones. All you need is a few $400 DJIs and maybe some code you can find on the internet. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now