Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

You guys are arguing over whether or not she's a real Democrat or Republican as though we aren't in the middle of another generational transformation of the parties. There is no party ideology right now. Obama was the death of the Kennedy-to-Clinton Democratic party and Trump was the death of the Nixon-to-W.Bush Republican party. 

 

We have no idea what the next versions of the parties will look like, so how can we know who is a "real" member? 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Lord Ratner said:

We have no idea what the next versions of the parties will look like, so how can we know who is a "real" member? 

That’s an interesting perspective, can’t say I disagree. We have to see how it all settles out, but I think we may be seeing a significant shift where the Republicans and Dems have switched places as “the party of the people” and “the party of the elite ruling class, billionaires, etc.” The GOP will really ride this rocket ship if they’re successful (and this will take voters doing their part) at flushing the establishment Rs from their ranks. 

  • Upvote 2
Posted
22 hours ago, arg said:

 

Dibs

  • Upvote 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Majestik Møøse said:

Turns out Gaetz is a fuckhead, confirmed. Perhaps congress should be drug tested more than once/never.

The report doesn’t give any evidence, though they like to say “there’s lots of evidence” in it (without sharing). There’s so much evidence that the DOJ investigated him and did not charge him. The guy is as hated as Trump by the weaponized DOJ, and yet zero charges. So that only says one thing: there’s nothing on him, at least legally. Falsehoods have also already been proven, and on top of that it’s clearly a partisan attack (where are all the other ethics reports on everyone else in congress? I’ll hold my breath). This ethics report is bullshit and has zero credibility. I say all this as someone who isn’t sad he’s out of congress, but I will call a spade a spade.

Edited by brabus
  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, brabus said:

The report doesn’t give any evidence, though they like to say “there’s lots of evidence” in it (without sharing). There’s so much evidence that the DOJ investigated him and did not charge him. The guy is as hated as Trump by the weaponized DOJ, and yet zero charges. So that only says one thing: there’s nothing on him, at least legally. Falsehoods have also already been proven, and on top of that it’s clearly a partisan attack (where are all the other ethics reports on everyone else in congress? I’ll hold my breath). This ethics report is bullshit and has zero credibility. I say all this as someone who isn’t sad he’s out of congress, but I will call a spade a spade.

Yup. I'd love to see if they were using the same batshit-crazy witness that the DOJ dismissed. They almost certainly are, and that guy is literally in jail. 

But it's not all bullshit. He was clearly living the sex-drugs-and-rock-and-roll lifestyle, which while legal, is probably not how he portrayed himself to his constituents. And even though he wasn't the perpetrator, sex parties are notorious for hiring prostitutes to balance out the male-to-female ratio. 

 

He's gross, but not that gross, and probably not a child rapist. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...