Ebony zer Posted January 18 Posted January 18 Trump nominated Matthew Lohmier to be the undersecretary of the Air Force. We’ve all sat around as CGOs and FGOs and talked about what we would do if we were in charge. Now we’ll get to see what that looks like with a retired major as the SECDEF and a former Lt Col as #2 in the Air Force. 1 4
BashiChuni Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Lohmier is the real deal, a fantastic leader, and will be GREAT in this position.
Lord Ratner Posted January 19 Posted January 19 7 hours ago, Vetter said: A FAIP as SECAF. Dear God… Hook 'em All!! ☠️🏴☠️ 3
skybert Posted January 19 Posted January 19 9 hours ago, Vetter said: A FAIP as SECAF. Dear God… And a member of the E4 mafia as vice president, I love it! 1
Sua Sponte Posted January 20 Posted January 20 Ramswammy pulling a negative Scaramucci departing before a fake department even begins under a new administration. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/vivek-ramaswamy-expected-to-depart-doge/
HeloDude Posted January 20 Posted January 20 2 hours ago, Day Man said: cue trump's disparaging remarks about him in 3,2... You just couldn’t help yourself, could you? https://newrepublic.com/post/190275/donald-trump-vivek-ramaswamy-senator 1
Sua Sponte Posted January 20 Posted January 20 12 hours ago, HeloDude said: You just couldn’t help yourself, could you? https://newrepublic.com/post/190275/donald-trump-vivek-ramaswamy-senator https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/politics/2025/01/17/mike-dewine-to-pick-jon-husted-to-fill-jd-vances-ohio-senate-seat/77483035007/
HeloDude Posted January 20 Posted January 20 55 minutes ago, Sua Sponte said: https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/politics/2025/01/17/mike-dewine-to-pick-jon-husted-to-fill-jd-vances-ohio-senate-seat/77483035007/ Yep, Vivek is going to run for Ohio governor. And if Trump was good with Vivek being Senator then I’m sure Trump will be good with being Governor…unlike Day Man said.
disgruntledemployee Posted January 20 Author Posted January 20 What's the over/under on Trump firing his first Cabinet position? I'm going to set it at 6 months from their confirmation. What's the over/under on a Trump nominee departing office on their own? I'll set it at 6.9 months. Turnover happens, but it seemed like it happened a whole lot more with Donno T.
Smokin Posted January 20 Posted January 20 The implication is that turnover is a bad thing. He has to hire people for a job they've never done before. Sometimes they work out, sometimes they don't. Look at the rate of senior commanders fired in WWII and how well it worked out in the long run. 2
disgruntledemployee Posted January 21 Author Posted January 21 5 hours ago, Smokin said: The implication is that turnover is a bad thing. He has to hire people for a job they've never done before. Sometimes they work out, sometimes they don't. Look at the rate of senior commanders fired in WWII and how well it worked out in the long run. So you're equating working for Trump as going into battle in a world war? Any other defending comments? The implication is that Trump fired more Cabinet than his predecessors in modern times. I'm sure someone can math it cause I'm lazy, but it was a lot. So I'm going to set some odds.
Smokin Posted January 21 Posted January 21 1 minute ago, disgruntledemployee said: So you're equating working for Trump as going into battle in a world war? Any other defending comments? The implication is that Trump fired more Cabinet than his predecessors in modern times. I'm sure someone can math it cause I'm lazy, but it was a lot. So I'm going to set some odds. I equated nothing. I used WWII leadership as an example of how hard it is to hire people for jobs none of the applicants have done and that firing bad leaders may clear the path for good ones. That does not imply that war and working for Trump are the same. If you inferred that, then that speaks more to your presuppositions than my statement.
disgruntledemployee Posted January 21 Author Posted January 21 2 minutes ago, Smokin said: I equated nothing. I used WWII leadership as an example of how hard it is to hire people for jobs none of the applicants have done and that firing bad leaders may clear the path for good ones. That does not imply that war and working for Trump are the same. If you inferred that, then that speaks more to your presuppositions than my statement. Quibbling
Day Man Posted January 21 Posted January 21 6 hours ago, Smokin said: The implication is that turnover is a bad thing. He has to hire people for a job they've never done before. Sometimes they work out, sometimes they don't. Look at the rate of senior commanders fired in WWII and how well it worked out in the long run. funny you mention WWII...
Smokin Posted January 21 Posted January 21 5 minutes ago, disgruntledemployee said: Quibbling Says every FAIP that was wrong but doesn't want to admit it... 2
dream big Posted January 21 Posted January 21 13 minutes ago, Day Man said: funny you mention WWII... Elon Musk is a Nazi? I’ve seen this floating around our disgruntled leftist friends. I can see the left hasn’t learned anything from the November 2024 beating. Taking photos out of context to insinuate your opponents are Nazis is what drove millions of people away from the Democratic Party. 3
disgruntledemployee Posted January 21 Author Posted January 21 7 minutes ago, Smokin said: Says every FAIP that was wrong but doesn't want to admit it... I was not a FAIP, but maybe you were/are. We can pick this back up after the first firing and you can compare it to the firing of Patton, especially if there is a slap involved. Beers!
HeloDude Posted January 21 Posted January 21 5 minutes ago, disgruntledemployee said: I was not a FAIP, but maybe you were/are. We can pick this back up after the first firing and you can compare it to the firing of Patton, especially if there is a slap involved. Beers! What exactly do you have against people being fired if the boss doesn’t think they’re up to the task? 2
disgruntledemployee Posted January 21 Author Posted January 21 4 minutes ago, HeloDude said: What exactly do you have against people being fired if the boss doesn’t think they’re up to the task? Against the people? Nothing. My post well above was about Trump and how he had a penchant for firing his Cabinet, so I placed odds. Now ND is making it interesting, so I'll chat later.
Sua Sponte Posted January 21 Posted January 21 Speaking of being fired, I guess I might be. https://chcoc.gov/sites/default/files/Guidance on Admin Leave and Probationary Periods 1-20-2025.pdf
StoleIt Posted January 21 Posted January 21 17 minutes ago, dream big said: Elon Musk is a Nazi? I’ve seen this floating around our disgruntled leftist friends. I can see the left hasn’t learned anything from the November 2024 beating. Taking photos out of context to insinuate your opponents are Nazis is what drove millions of people away from the Democratic Party. I watched the video. Dude does it twice. Unless there is some South African cultural connection to this gesture it really can't be explained away or dismissed. 1
brabus Posted January 21 Posted January 21 (edited) 20 minutes ago, StoleIt said: I watched the video. Dude does it twice. Unless there is some South African cultural connection to this gesture it really can't be explained away or dismissed. In conjunction with the words, “my heart goes out to you,” he touches his heart and then gestures towards the crowd. He’s literally gesturing the associated words. Not that it should matter, but also the actual salute referenced never touches the torso at all, it’s simply just directly raising the arm out. To draw this conclusion in reference to Elon is nothing but absurd retardation on display by leftist dipshits. Don’t get sucked into it. Edited January 21 by brabus 3 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now