HeloDude Posted December 14 Posted December 14 2 hours ago, ClearedHot said: Time for its own thread. Someone is going to get hurt. This looks like an airsoft gun, but a matter of time until folks start opening up with ARs and AKs. AQMmtPlt9HCUgULEzVQ_eOfLeHRuDMci5hnsv-dfz0uV9vTznxxTRjj_CkPH1bfSVcMp1BE9ZNieebOnOTInA7mo.mp4 9.32 MB · 0 downloads Those are illegal in NJ and most of the NE states, so we’re good. 1 1
Lord Ratner Posted December 14 Posted December 14 6 hours ago, tac airlifter said: Good find. I have no idea what's happening there; you suspect mass hysteria? Yep. No different than all the pilots talking about UFOs right now because they don't understand how starlink satellites reflect the sun back at us. 1
ClearedHot Posted December 14 Posted December 14 9 minutes ago, Lord Ratner said: Yep. No different than all the pilots talking about UFOs right now because they don't understand how starlink satellites reflect the sun back at us. Not just pilots, people here in NW Florida all worked up the other night about a "special military exercise with 40+ airplanes flying fast down the beach at high altitude.
arg Posted December 15 Posted December 15 1 hour ago, ClearedHot said: airplanes flying fast down the beach at high altitude. That's no fun. Need to be low enough to see the boobies. 2
gearhog Posted December 15 Posted December 15 More people are coalescing around this theory. This guy is a commercial drone manufacturer. "The only reason to fly a drone around at night is if you're looking for something." It makes sense that our authorities seem to be not taking action because they know the drones are ours and do not post a threat. What's the greater risk? - Allowing the public to freak out a little over their unexplained presence in the sky - Truthfully explaining the underlying reason for their presence, and perhaps causing an even greater panic https://x.com/MilaLovesJoe/status/1868042627360403849 1
Standby Posted December 15 Posted December 15 1 hour ago, Lord Ratner said: Yep. No different than all the pilots talking about UFOs right now because they don't understand how starlink satellites reflect the sun back at us. What about the Starlink satellites that maneuver in 3 dimensions?
tac airlifter Posted December 15 Posted December 15 2 hours ago, Lord Ratner said: Yep. No different than all the pilots talking about UFOs right now because they don't understand how starlink satellites reflect the sun back at us. There are a shockingly high number of retarded pilots. But there are also things that don't make sense, and non-retarded people asking legit questions. 1
SurelySerious Posted December 15 Posted December 15 More people are coalescing around this theory. This guy is a commercial drone manufacturer. "The only reason to fly a drone around at night is if you're looking for something." It makes sense that our authorities seem to be not taking action because they know the drones are ours and do not post a threat. What's the greater risk? - Allowing the public to freak out a little over their unexplained presence in the sky - Truthfully explaining the underlying reason for their presence, and perhaps causing an even greater panic https://x.com/MilaLovesJoe/status/1868042627360403849Manufacurer of manned drones? Interesting tweet. 1
ClearedHot Posted December 15 Posted December 15 1 hour ago, gearhog said: More people are coalescing around this theory. This guy is a commercial drone manufacturer. "The only reason to fly a drone around at night is if you're looking for something." It makes sense that our authorities seem to be not taking action because they know the drones are ours and do not post a threat. What's the greater risk? - Allowing the public to freak out a little over their unexplained presence in the sky - Truthfully explaining the underlying reason for their presence, and perhaps causing an even greater panic https://x.com/MilaLovesJoe/status/1868042627360403849 This "theory" has merit and is being quietly whispered by lots of folks. 2
Lord Ratner Posted December 15 Posted December 15 3 hours ago, Standby said: What about the Starlink satellites that maneuver in 3 dimensions? They aren't. It looks that way when you catch two different intersecting orbits that illuminate and extinguish at the intersection point. I've seen it and it's completely trippy, but the giveaway is usually that it's repeating, which makes sense because the satellites are evenly spaced in their orbits. It doesn't take a lot of mental horsepower to debunk the "conspiracy." Alien spaceships have no need for headlights. And secret government programs that have functional anti-gravity propulsion systems aren't going to leave the nav lights on while they do donuts over population centers for fun. 4
Standby Posted Sunday at 05:52 PM Posted Sunday at 05:52 PM 12 hours ago, Lord Ratner said: They aren't. It looks that way when you catch two different intersecting orbits that illuminate and extinguish at the intersection point. I've seen it and it's completely trippy, but the giveaway is usually that it's repeating, which makes sense because the satellites are evenly spaced in their orbits. It doesn't take a lot of mental horsepower to debunk the "conspiracy." Alien spaceships have no need for headlights. And secret government programs that have functional anti-gravity propulsion systems aren't going to leave the nav lights on while they do donuts over population centers for fun. You got the first part right…what some of us see is not Starlink. What we do see defies conventional capabilities. EXTREMELY apparent that it’s non-linear motion. I know you are well-read and think you have this all figured out, but I was flying a Space Force orbital warfare officer who saw what we saw…that individual was just as baffled. Not saying this person knows it all, but if they didn’t know then maybe things exist out there that actually require ‘a lot of mental horsepower.’ 2
Lord Ratner Posted Sunday at 09:26 PM Posted Sunday at 09:26 PM 3 hours ago, Standby said: You got the first part right…what some of us see is not Starlink. What we do see defies conventional capabilities. EXTREMELY apparent that it’s non-linear motion. I know you are well-read and think you have this all figured out, but I was flying a Space Force orbital warfare officer who saw what we saw…that individual was just as baffled. Not saying this person knows it all, but if they didn’t know then maybe things exist out there that actually require ‘a lot of mental horsepower.’ Ok.
McJay Pilot Posted Monday at 12:12 AM Posted Monday at 12:12 AM 22 hours ago, SurelySerious said: Manufacurer of manned drones? Interesting tweet. “They’re unmanned drones… with men in them. The men are just for ballast.” -Zapp Brannigan 2 1 1
tac airlifter Posted Monday at 12:25 AM Posted Monday at 12:25 AM (edited) I don't understand why the government can't simply say "there are programs we can't talk about" and ending it at that. Much is hysterics, I can't even imagine the phone calls FBI is getting. That said, there is something happening. Edited Monday at 12:30 AM by tac airlifter
disgruntledemployee Posted Monday at 12:28 AM Posted Monday at 12:28 AM Acquiring, let alone handling to flying a gamma ray souce would result in some serious radiation sickness to someone doing that without containment. Containers for such are heavy and maybe out of drone capabilities. That doesn't mean someone won't try to steal a source and try to fly it, but it's not as easy as people think.
gearhog Posted Monday at 12:37 PM Posted Monday at 12:37 PM (edited) Wright Patterson AFB. "Medflight 8, Patterson tower, use extreme caution for heavy UAS movement on the base. Security forces is handling the situation." https://x.com/Aviation_Intel/status/1868501899890348402 Edited Monday at 12:37 PM by gearhog 1
ClearedHot Posted Monday at 12:39 PM Posted Monday at 12:39 PM 11 hours ago, disgruntledemployee said: Acquiring, let alone handling to flying a gamma ray souce would result in some serious radiation sickness to someone doing that without containment. Containers for such are heavy and maybe out of drone capabilities. That doesn't mean someone won't try to steal a source and try to fly it, but it's not as easy as people think. I don't believe the postulated theory is threat is a actor trying to trying to fly a gamma source in. More likely the fear is DNI/FBI/HS beleive an unaccounted for weapon (or material), has been smuggled into the US there is an ongoing search for said item. It is widely known that NYC, Washington DC, borders and some other major cities are protected by ground based gamma detectors. The fear for NYC has always been that an actor could exploit the waterways and bring one in on a ship. The activity in NJ makes some sense as it is across the Hudson from NYC. If there is a weapon on the ground it is likely heavily shielded and traditional wide search sensors on aircraft might not be as effective. Searching with UAVs at night at much lower altitudes could be an effective/efficient way to methodically search. DOE has been using UAVs to monitor disposal/storage sites for years. Something is going on...I hope this is all tin foil hat stuff although I would not be anywhere near Times Square on New Years eye.
M2 Posted Monday at 02:27 PM Posted Monday at 02:27 PM On 12/13/2024 at 12:18 PM, Biff_T said: It'd be cool to let one of our dudes shoot one down. It'd probably turn out to be a box of amazon dildos being delivered during the hours of darkness. To BQZip's mom's house?!? 2
disgruntledemployee Posted Monday at 02:33 PM Posted Monday at 02:33 PM 1 hour ago, ClearedHot said: I don't believe the postulated theory is threat is a actor trying to trying to fly a gamma source in. More likely the fear is DNI/FBI/HS beleive an unaccounted for weapon (or material), has been smuggled into the US there is an ongoing search for said item. It is widely known that NYC, Washington DC, borders and some other major cities are protected by ground based gamma detectors. The fear for NYC has always been that an actor could exploit the waterways and bring one in on a ship. The activity in NJ makes some sense as it is across the Hudson from NYC. If there is a weapon on the ground it is likely heavily shielded and traditional wide search sensors on aircraft might not be as effective. Searching with UAVs at night at much lower altitudes could be an effective/efficient way to methodically search. DOE has been using UAVs to monitor disposal/storage sites for years. Something is going on...I hope this is all tin foil hat stuff although I would not be anywhere near Times Square on New Years eye. That's what I'm thinking, a search. I saw above a pic that had tweet words that alluded to arming a drome with a gamma source. Might as well say what is going on and why. If it is a search, bad dudes probably figured out they're being hunted. Some John Q might have seen something. When someone shoots one down and they analyze the payload, or live feed video of the black SUVs that arrive to get the thing, the gig is up.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now