Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So any word on when they actually plan to release this years bonus details? Keeping out hope for a $35K bonus with 1 year  commitment...daddy needs a new Jet Ski before he retires!

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Hunter Rose said:

So any word on when they actually plan to release this years bonus details? Keeping out hope for a $35K bonus with 1 year  commitment...daddy needs a new Jet Ski before he retires!

 

I’d expect it once the gov has a full budget for the year and not these 6-9 week CR’s kicking the can down the road. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Any AFRC pilots navs NOT get their bonus payout this year?  Should’ve been this pay period. 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Bonus. “It’s essential”.

AD program. Capped at 35k per year by law (he claimed). O5 and below. Tiers. And required after pilot commitment complete.

2022 doesn’t have an appropriations bill yet or CR. So no bonus program yet. They saw 2020 and 2021 bonus takers were similar to pre covid. Roughly bonus paid out per year = 194 million.

Sounds like they are trying to change the bonus program completely. A big overhaul for 2023. They are planning on starting from scratch and potentially asking for relief from current laws. He claims it could look significantly different than the bonus in the recent decades.

Posted

Question asked about airline hiring and how to retain people.

Answer. Retention working group looks to solve pilot problem by getting them into the guard and reserve (guard and reserve doesn’t have a retention problem btw). Sounds like they are pushing for guard and reserve to take in more people and more experienced people. So far he’s not talking about why that’s in the individual pilots benefit. Just the AF’s benefit.

He is talking about figuring out how to make bonus more money and how to make pilots lives better. No real details on how but just that they are looking at it. He brought up the we have less deployments to the CENTCOM AOR so that should help. Then he admitted that he has no real solutions right now.

Posted

Asked about what are they doing to take additional duties off pilots backs (question about being and RA and instructor pilot). He didn’t say if it was on their radar prior to the question but did say it is now. Went into additional duties being downgraded. But then went into why it’s important to the AF works for the AF. And how if as an RA you know how the AFdoes money that it will be extremely important for you. So he side stepped the question kinda. And said that RA’s learn how the AF’s money works (debatable general. Agree to disagree). “The more you learn about money, the better off you will be in your Air Force Career.”

He did say they are making a push for admin people in the squadrons.

Then the moderator spoke up in favor of additional duties.

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Guardian said:

Talent market place question. WTF is that? Never heard of it.

You've never done the MyVector thing where you see all the avaliable jobs for your rank and AFSC?

It's what replaced the old ADP.

Edited by pawnman
Posted
You've never done the MyVector thing where you see all the avaliable jobs foe your rank and AFSC?
It's what replaced the old ADP.
Ah. Gotcha. Nope I haven’t.
Posted
3 minutes ago, Guardian said:

Asked about what are they doing to take additional duties off pilots backs (question about being and RA and instructor pilot). He didn’t say if it was on their radar prior to the question but did say it is now. Went into additional duties being downgraded. But then went into why it’s important to the AF works for the AF. And how if as an RA you know how the AFdoes money that it will be extremely important for you. So he side stepped the question kinda. And said that RA’s learn how the AF’s money works (debatable general. Agree to disagree). “The more you learn about money, the better off you will be in your Air Force Career.”

He did say they are making a push for admin people in the squadrons.

Then the moderator spoke up in favor of additional duties.

I mean..... I see the point here. I hate additional duties more than any other. But the AF knows it grabs its future commanders and GO's from the pilot ranks. Before you command a squadron you've hopefully hopped a few shops in a squadron and understand their basic mechanisms that make them work. Before you lead a group, you hopefully understand the spending and resource allocation. Goes on.... but what he's basically getting at is you are learning the foundations that the government operates on. 

The problem is...... only 10% of pilots are going to command. For the other 90% of pilots this a waste of time and its frankly exhausting. At the same time, we as a pilot union, get peeved when the AF crops its future leaders too early in their career and funnels them into better jobs. So I don't really have a good solution on this one either. 

5 minutes ago, Guardian said:

Talent market place question. WTF is that? Never heard of it.

Replace the Airman Development Plan for finding and allocating assignments. You now bid on a assignments and commanders of those assignments can bid on you. Then some algorithm assigns you based on bids and needs of the Air Force. 

Posted

He just spent a lot of time talking about how do we lower washout rate from pilot training. And then threw a little caveat about how they want to make sure that the pilots are good.

Seemed more important to him to lower the washout rate based on total amount of time spent on that in his answer.

Posted

Asked how he was going to get money and less additional duties. He responded that we aren’t aviators that are officers. We are officers that are aviators. Then went on to talk about officer ship. And how being an officer is more important than being an aviator but then discussed how we have to be as good of pilots as possible.

So I like the guy and feel for him but that was a tough one for him to answer. He spoke about things that don’t equal each other. He wants pilots to be the best officers they can be by having additional duties and leadership responsibilities while being the best absolute aviator and warfighter possible. For most, those things can’t happen at the same time.

Posted

Worth the watch. A little over an hour long.

Bottom line no 22 bonus yet till an appropriations bill is approved potential large bonus structure change in 23 (and they want people who sign the 22 or earlier to be able to sign on the 23 bonus).

No change likely in additional duties, hired additional squadron help, or max amount in money for 22.

Posted
26 minutes ago, Guardian said:

Asked how he was going to get money and less additional duties. He responded that we aren’t aviators that are officers. We are officers that are aviators. Then went on to talk about officer ship. And how being an officer is more important than being an aviator but then discussed how we have to be as good of pilots as possible.

So I like the guy and feel for him but that was a tough one for him to answer. He spoke about things that don’t equal each other. He wants pilots to be the best officers they can be by having additional duties and leadership responsibilities while being the best absolute aviator and warfighter possible. For most, those things can’t happen at the same time.

Yeah, the problem is really difficult to solve unless there are some fundamental changes to the way the AF recruits, mentors and manages pilot manpower.

I honestly thing we need a holistic look at force structure in general, starting with the officer/enlisted paradigm. Its something we grabbed from 17th century warfare and very little has been done to advance it.  Not saying I have the ideas or the solutions but that's the place I would start. 

Posted

I’m still hung up on his attitude is every officer should desire to run the Air Force and be the best pilot while taking less money and doing additional work. That’s a tough one.

Posted
59 minutes ago, Guardian said:

Asked about what are they doing to take additional duties off pilots backs (question about being and RA and instructor pilot). He didn’t say if it was on their radar prior to the question but did say it is now. Went into additional duties being downgraded. But then went into why it’s important to the AF works for the AF. And how if as an RA you know how the AFdoes money that it will be extremely important for you. So he side stepped the question kinda. And said that RA’s learn how the AF’s money works (debatable general. Agree to disagree). “The more you learn about money, the better off you will be in your Air Force Career.”

He did say they are making a push for admin people in the squadrons.

Then the moderator spoke up in favor of additional duties.

I had to do RA stuff for a while. I learned very little about budgeting and a whole lot about what a pain DTS and GPC programs are to manage. 

  • Upvote 2
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Guardian said:

I’m still hung up on his attitude is every officer should desire to run the Air Force and be the best pilot while taking less money and doing additional work. That’s a tough one.

 

 

da488e96-abb7-4c56-90ee-ba216676cb26_text.gif

Edited by QAZqaz
Posted

If big blue hasn’t gotten it by now, they’re never going to get it.

Stay in or get out…just do what’s best for you and your family and don’t expect a whole lot of positive changes.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
If you haven’t gotten it by now, you’re never going to get it.
Stay in…just do what’s best for Big Blue and expect a whole lot of positive changes…Is what a General would say!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Funny, they let me separate without ever offering me a bonus.  As for the pilot vs officer first.  My ROTC commitment was 4 years.  My UPT commitment was 10 years.  So which one was keeping me on the hook for the last 2/3 of my career?  And they are offended that (many) pilots see themselves as a pilot first. For me, the commission was just a means to an end.

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1
Posted
On 8/25/2021 at 5:37 PM, di1630 said:

~1 month to go:

Fixed wing overall take rate: 32%

11F: 24%
11B: 31%
11M: 29%

Ouch

Do you know the break even point, back when Orville, Wilbur and myself were offered the bonus they needed 64% to break even.

On 9/1/2021 at 6:14 AM, Chuck17 said:

Get ready for this kinda take rate being used as justification to kill the bonus altogether… I give it one more FY, tops. 

Makes a perfect compliment to the $300+B in cuts coming to the Pentagon… 

Rough roads ahead. 

Chuck

Highly doubtful at this point.  Given the Russia/Ukraine situation and the potential for the house to flip I doubt we will see a substantial decrease int he Defense Budget.

Posted
9 hours ago, ClearedHot said:

Do you know the break even point, back when Orville, Wilbur and myself were offered the bonus they needed 64% to break even.

The target is still 65% to maintain status quo manning. Big Air Force hasn't made that in years...probably approaching a decade now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...