WheelsOff Posted July 20, 2021 Posted July 20, 2021 (edited) On 7/5/2021 at 6:04 PM, hindsight2020 said: until the current autocrat in the training throne retires Ugh. Is that guy ever gonna leave?! Edited July 20, 2021 by WheelsOff
Ryder1587 Posted July 20, 2021 Posted July 20, 2021 Did the take rates for this year get published yet ? Or are they too embarrassed to release them?
Hunter Rose Posted July 21, 2021 Posted July 21, 2021 13 hours ago, Ryder1587 said: Did the take rates for this year get published yet ? Or are they too embarrassed to release them? The current take rates are out there. I think it's on that aircrew task force website. It's a not well advertised link that you have to hunt for. I looked at them two weeks ago, and they are abysmal, as should be expected with such a shitty bonus. Overall rate was like 36% or so. Fighter/bombers were even lower. A couple months left for folks to sign it so the numbers may increase, but it looked like it was shaping up to be the worst take rates in the last 5+ years. I'll track it down today at work.
Muscle2002 Posted July 22, 2021 Posted July 22, 2021 On 7/21/2021 at 8:58 AM, Hunter Rose said: The current take rates are out there. I think it's on that aircrew task force website. It's a not well advertised link that you have to hunt for. I looked at them two weeks ago, and they are abysmal, as should be expected with such a shitty bonus. Overall rate was like 36% or so. Fighter/bombers were even lower. A couple months left for folks to sign it so the numbers may increase, but it looked like it was shaping up to be the worst take rates in the last 5+ years. I'll track it down today at work. Why worry about retention when PA can just write a chintzy article about retention and how the Total Force hopes it can preserve talent that “The nation has invested millions of dollars in training these great Americans to protect and defend our way of life." Pilots Leaving Active Duty Have Safe Landing Place in Reserve/Guard
skosh Posted July 23, 2021 Posted July 23, 2021 https://starsdemog.a1vdc.us.af.mil/Avb/avb.html Here's the AvB 2021 stat tracker site. (Recommend viewing in Chrome) Lots of interesting info there, and you can also go back and look at historical data. There's also a filter section and spreadsheet at the bottom where you can find your MAJCOM/MDS/Base of interest and see what individual people are doing. Numbers are abysmal (not surprising given the changes this year), with just over a month left in the window. Fixed wing pilot take rate is still sitting below 30%. Full disclosure: I'm likely signing the 8 year bonus, as I was planning on staying in until retirement anyway and I still love my job (most days). The pros outweigh the cons for my family and my situation. But this bonus would NOT have been anywhere near competitive enough to convince me if I was on the fence. Anyone know if the recently marked NDAA from the SASC made any changes to the bonus?
di1630 Posted August 13, 2021 Posted August 13, 2021 As of 9 AugFighters 24%Bombers 26%Fatties 27%Spec ops 47%Rescue 51%Manned overall 32%
Day Man Posted August 13, 2021 Posted August 13, 2021 i would enjoy some serious schadenfreude at the AF's expense, but the national security implications are worrying. 1
Hunter Rose Posted August 13, 2021 Posted August 13, 2021 (edited) 12 hours ago, Day Man said: i would enjoy some serious schadenfreude at the AF's expense, but the national security implications are worrying. I'll enjoy the schadenfreude. I'd feel a little sympathy if the AF had left the bonus at pre-COVID terms. But they didn't. They took the risk that COVID would affect the airlines longer, and offered a bonus with shit terms with less money/longer minimum commitments. They gambled and lost. So to hell with a big AF that makes it pretty clear they do not appreciate their rated force. Edited August 13, 2021 by Hunter Rose 5 2
Magellan Posted August 13, 2021 Posted August 13, 2021 2 hours ago, Hunter Rose said: I'll enjoy the schadenfreude. I'd feel a little sympathy if the AF had left the bonus at pre-COVID terms. But they didn't. They took the risk that COVID would affect the airlines longer, and offered a bonus with shit terms with less money/longer minimum commitments. They gambled and lost. So to hell with a big AF that makes it pretty clear they do not appreciate their rated force. Well given the direction this country is going since we are about to pass a 3.5 Trillion dollar piece of legislation I wouldn't be surprised to see the Airlines get nationalized if the party in power felt it was time to go to war.
08Dawg Posted August 14, 2021 Posted August 14, 2021 On 7/22/2021 at 1:22 PM, Muscle2002 said: Pilots Leaving Active Duty Have Safe Landing Place in Reserve/Guard Hey PA, you misspelled “Delta Airlines”. 3
SurelySerious Posted August 14, 2021 Posted August 14, 2021 Hey PA, you misspelled “Delta Airlines”. Whoah, it’s Delta Air Lines; they’re very particular. 4
DuckHunter Posted August 14, 2021 Posted August 14, 2021 57 minutes ago, SurelySerious said: Whoah, it’s Delta Air Lines; they’re very particular. 1
hindsight2020 Posted August 14, 2021 Posted August 14, 2021 Complementary Soviet sub outfit too. One ping only Vasily, we're starting our descent to FCO.... 😄 2 1
di1630 Posted August 25, 2021 Posted August 25, 2021 ~1 month to go: Fixed wing overall take rate: 32%11F: 24%11B: 31%11M: 29%Ouch 1
Magellan Posted August 26, 2021 Posted August 26, 2021 4 hours ago, di1630 said: ~1 month to go: Fixed wing overall take rate: 32% 11F: 24% 11B: 31% 11M: 29% Ouch Guess they over forecast the COVID-19 retention spike...smooth move Air Force...
Chuck17 Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 On 8/25/2021 at 5:37 PM, di1630 said: ~1 month to go: Fixed wing overall take rate: 32% 11F: 24% 11B: 31% 11M: 29% Ouch Get ready for this kinda take rate being used as justification to kill the bonus altogether… I give it one more FY, tops. Makes a perfect compliment to the $300+B in cuts coming to the Pentagon… Rough roads ahead. Chuck 1
NKAWTG Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 9 minutes ago, Chuck17 said: Get ready for this kinda take rate being used as justification to kill the bonus altogether… I give it one more FY, tops. Makes a perfect compliment to the $300+B in cuts coming to the Pentagon… Rough roads ahead. Chuck Retention rate would be around 30% regardless if there was a bonus or not. They won't raise it enough to move the needle, so I certainly see the temptation to eliminate it. I'd rather they plan to staff service with the 30% rate in mind. Open another pilot pilot training base. Resource it with new iron and personnel. Staff the FTUs. Accept 5 to 7 years of degraded capability while the new paradigm takes hold. Pipe dream of course. Bureaucracies don't change wholesale, just incrementally Most likely COA is to continue the course, massage the data until it meets the metric, and adjust the metric once the fuzzy math won't work. Maybe a quad chart or something. If we're lucky, our mission sets over the next few years will be deterrence focused instead kinetic. Hopefully.
pawnman Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 If the only people taking the bonus are the ones who would stay anyway... why would the Air Force keep it?
Magellan Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 55 minutes ago, pawnman said: If the only people taking the bonus are the ones who would stay anyway... why would the Air Force keep it? Retention could tank even further. I think it is a false assumption that those 30% were staying anyway. The IDE, Staff, DO, SQ/CC, School, Staff hustle to stay Tier 1 and survive until 20 years becomes A LOT less appealing if you pay them $245,000 or more less... 1
StoleIt Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 I don't think I would have gambled a 3 year ADSC extension (because of COVID) if it wasn't for the extra bonus money. I probably would have taken the ART job or DSG options I had. I sure do regret not taking the ART now! Granted, I'm also not the main consumer the bonus is being marketed to. The AF really wants people to stay til 20, thus why they dropped the shorter term bonus. Better question, with the rate the airlines are going to higher...can the AF take a risk messing with the bonus any more just to find out if that 30% would stay regardless? I mean...what if it drops to 10%? Are they prepared to basically gut an entire FY of officers?
di1630 Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 The bonus does matter. Imagine the line pilot working 14 hour days making the same plus measly flight pay as the shoe clerk that barely works.I’d cut the bonus and make flight pay $1k at UPT and then rise $250 a year to $4k.We’d get better UPT candidates I bet and better retention.
pawnman Posted September 1, 2021 Posted September 1, 2021 20 minutes ago, di1630 said: The bonus does matter. Imagine the line pilot working 14 hour days making the same plus measly flight pay as the shoe clerk that barely works. I’d cut the bonus and make flight pay $1k at UPT and then rise $250 a year to $4k. We’d get better UPT candidates I bet and better retention. Maybe...but doesn't your scenario describe every pilot who doesn't take the bonus but stays on AD? I'd be curious if retention rates match bonus take rates. I suspect they're not one-for-one.
DuckHunter Posted September 2, 2021 Posted September 2, 2021 13 hours ago, Chuck17 said: Get ready for this kinda take rate being used as justification to kill the bonus altogether… I give it one more FY, tops. Makes a perfect compliment to the $300+B in cuts coming to the Pentagon… Rough roads ahead. Chuck Great. Maybe they’ll bring back early retirement.
Bender Posted September 4, 2021 Posted September 4, 2021 Retention could tank even further. I think it is a false assumption that those 30% were staying anyway. The IDE, Staff, DO, SQ/CC, School, Staff hustle to stay Tier 1 and survive until 20 years becomes A LOT less appealing if you pay them $245,000 or more less...Retention will tank further; every passing day proves it…I agree. I disagree about the 30%, they were at worst willing to stay. I also disagree it takes any of those thing listed to make it to 20 years.That said, we’re in a bad way. Centralized Command, Decentralized Control, and the lower echelons of Command AND the highest levels of Control are both incentivized to just say yes, beyond reason. It’s clear to those who can see it, at the highest and lowest levels.It’s a great job (calling even) this AF pilot gig…it’s a horrible place to spend a career. Don’t ever think it’s the same for 20 years…be a pilot, serve your country, then choose for yourself if this is what you want. Most of us stay because we think others need help/protection. If no one cared about people, the take rate would round down to zero. IMO.Don’t take the bonus unless you love/will love what you’re doing…to each their own.~BendySent from my iPad using Baseops Network mobile app 5 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now