Scooter14 Posted September 4, 2021 Posted September 4, 2021 Great. Maybe they’ll bring back early retirement.Don’t tease me
DuckHunter Posted September 4, 2021 Posted September 4, 2021 3 hours ago, Scooter14 said: Don’t tease me Haha, I’m teasing myself. I’m one of the guys who was getting out (hit submit on my apps Mar 15, Aug separation date). I took the 3 year to see how things play out. That would be my best case scenario. That being said, I know better. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me a million times…
teaser Posted September 23, 2021 Posted September 23, 2021 Wait until the Bob's realize how many pilots are going to be required to conduct Over The Horizon missions. I have a feeling they are already regretting the recently reduced bonus amounts.
Sprkt69 Posted September 23, 2021 Posted September 23, 2021 6 hours ago, teaser said: Wait until the Bob's realize how many pilots are going to be required to conduct Over The Horizon missions. I have a feeling they are already regretting the recently reduced bonus amounts. I doubt it
Guest Posted September 24, 2021 Posted September 24, 2021 On 9/23/2021 at 12:51 PM, Sprkt69 said: I doubt it Sadly, it's probably this. Why do anything positive to keep pilot retention? Congress gives ANOTHER billion to the modern nation-state Israel instead 🤣
08Dawg Posted September 27, 2021 Posted September 27, 2021 On 9/1/2021 at 7:27 PM, DuckHunter said: Great. Maybe they’ll bring back early retirement. Don’t tempt me with a good time 1
Hunter Rose Posted October 13, 2021 Posted October 13, 2021 With the fiscal year over, I was curious where the take rates ended up. They were abysmal, as we all knew they would be. Overall rated take rates for Initial Eligible folks was 42.5%, but that is artificially inflated primarily by higher take rates among CSOs and RPA pilots. Fixed Wing Pilot initial take rate was 35.4%. AFSC breakouts were as follows: 11B - 30% 11F - 29% 11M - 31% 11H - 56% 11S - 54% Can't wait to see the spin if this gets any visibility in Congress.
raimius Posted October 13, 2021 Posted October 13, 2021 3 hours ago, Hunter Rose said: With the fiscal year over, I was curious where the take rates ended up. They were abysmal, as we all knew they would be. Overall rated take rates for Initial Eligible folks was 42.5%, but that is artificially inflated primarily by higher take rates among CSOs and RPA pilots. Fixed Wing Pilot initial take rate was 35.4%. AFSC breakouts were as follows: 11B - 30% 11F - 29% 11M - 31% 11H - 56% 11S - 54% Can't wait to see the spin if this gets any visibility in Congress. Curious what was the 11H rotary-wing rate?
Smokin Posted October 14, 2021 Posted October 14, 2021 Breaking news, congress doesn't care. They might ask 'did the 29% of fighter pilots that took the bonus complete their weekly CBT on transgender anti-racism training?' 3 1 1
HeloDude Posted October 14, 2021 Posted October 14, 2021 7 hours ago, raimius said: Curious what was the 11H rotary-wing rate? If I’m a betting man, I bet it’s around 60-65%. That’s assuming that HC-130 pilots make up 15-20% of the 11Hs and that about 35% of those pilots took the bonus.
Guardian Posted October 14, 2021 Posted October 14, 2021 What is a good or ideal take rate from the viewpoint of big blue?
jazzdude Posted October 14, 2021 Posted October 14, 2021 What is a good or ideal take rate from the viewpoint of big blue?The number used to be something like 65% take rate target. Haven't been anywhere near that for several years
Sua Sponte Posted December 27, 2021 Posted December 27, 2021 9 hours ago, King Ranch said: Any rumors on next year’s bonus? They're just going to pay for your ATP, Airline Apps, Prep course, etc. 1
Bigred Posted December 27, 2021 Posted December 27, 2021 11 hours ago, King Ranch said: Any rumors on next year’s bonus? Took a quick search through the 2022 NDAA and I found something to the effect of ‘extending special pay/bonuses’. So, it doesn’t look like the max will change. Now it’s up to the AF to decide how they want to spend it. 1
08Dawg Posted December 27, 2021 Posted December 27, 2021 I’d like to think after bungling it spectacularly last year, they’ll course correct back to something more like the FY19 bonus….but that implies intelligence and caring on the AF’s part.
CaptainMorgan Posted December 27, 2021 Posted December 27, 2021 Given they’re doubling down on producing rather than retaining to solve the shortage, I doubt we’ll see any improvements to the bonus. With Afghanistan over, I could also see them adjusting MAF crew ratios again to “help” our manning. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
FlyingWolf Posted December 28, 2021 Posted December 28, 2021 (edited) We're looking at the highest inflationary environment in most of our lifetimes, big airline hiring at the beginning of a long term surge, and omicron likely signaling endemic C-19. All on the heels of a dramatically poor take rate last year. You would think an adjustment to the contract offering would be a no-brainer... but who knows, maybe we need to fail catastrophically before we change. Edited December 28, 2021 by FlyingWolf
Chida Posted December 28, 2021 Posted December 28, 2021 NDAA just signed had this nugget: Reservist pilots to receive flight pay at the same monthly rate as an active duty guy, regardless of duty days, but first the services need to present their concerns to Congress, so who knows when it will actually be implemented. https://www.ngaus.org/about-ngaus/newsroom/incentive-pay-parity-included-final-ndaa
Scooter14 Posted December 28, 2021 Posted December 28, 2021 NDAA just signed had this nugget: Reservist pilots to receive flight pay at the same monthly rate as an active duty guy, regardless of duty days, but first the services need to present their concerns to Congress, so who knows when it will actually be implemented. https://www.ngaus.org/about-ngaus/newsroom/incentive-pay-parity-included-final-ndaaI remember signing a petition on some GeoCities website (remember that) around the turn of the century. The fact that reservists maintain the exact same quals but only got paid 1/30th of the flight pay per AFTP always irked me. I hope it goes through but much like expanded Space A benefits for reservists (which made it into the NDAA but never got implemented) I’m not holding my breath.
CaptainMorgan Posted December 28, 2021 Posted December 28, 2021 It has nothing to do with quals and never will. It’s ultimately about getting a 24/7 employee. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Chida Posted December 28, 2021 Posted December 28, 2021 Yeah I could see them saying something like "well we paid you a whole month of flight pay so really you're now 'on duty' even when you're not on duty" and then this line of thinking goes a step further to be "on call" so that if "you're the only one" you can be ordered to come in to the squadron to do whatever. Active duty lite.
SocialD Posted December 28, 2021 Posted December 28, 2021 5 hours ago, CaptainMorgan said: It has nothing to do with quals and never will. It’s ultimately about getting a 24/7 employee. They get a 24/7 employee with the full base pay, ACIP is to incentivize staying aircrew. I did have to laugh at this move because if I were a full-timer considering the jump to DSG/airline, getting full flight pay as a DSG isn't going to be an item I add to the "stay full time" column lol. 5 hours ago, Chida said: Yeah I could see them saying something like "well we paid you a whole month of flight pay so really you're now 'on duty' even when you're not on duty" and then this line of thinking goes a step further to be "on call" so that if "you're the only one" you can be ordered to come in to the squadron to do whatever. Active duty lite. Creeping up on 21 years in the ANG...as compared to when I joined, we've already become AD lite. But I don't see the full ACIP means you're "on duty" line of thinking. I can't even get a shot on base without being in a pay status...UTA/AFTP/AT/ST/AGR/etc.. are pay statuses, ACIP is not. Also, we're also already "on call." A recent example, the Friday afternoon before Christmas we got an e-mail asking for (by COB) specific reasons why we (individually) couldn't be activated for 502F state orders with a start date of the following Monday. The Governor decided to activate 1,300 of the Air/Army National Guard for ronas duties a few days prior to Christmas. We filled our quota with less than half volunteers, the rest were non-vols. Obviously, we could also be called up at any given time for any Federal activation.
slc Posted December 28, 2021 Posted December 28, 2021 7 hours ago, Scooter14 said: I remember signing a petition on some GeoCities website (remember that) around the turn of the century. The fact that reservists maintain the exact same quals but only got paid 1/30th of the flight pay per AFTP always irked me. I hope it goes through but much like expanded Space A benefits for reservists (which made it into the NDAA but never got implemented) I’m not holding my breath. What were the expanded Space A benefits specifically? This always pissed me off as well. Can't take dependents Space A even in CONUS. You have to wait till you're "activated"
ThreeHoler Posted December 28, 2021 Posted December 28, 2021 I remember signing a petition on some GeoCities website (remember that) around the turn of the century. The fact that reservists maintain the exact same quals but only got paid 1/30th of the flight pay per AFTP always irked me. I hope it goes through but much like expanded Space A benefits for reservists (which made it into the NDAA but never got implemented) I’m not holding my breath.IMO, ARC should get the full ACIP as long as they meet the same requirements of AD: 4 hours in a month (OFDA creditable month) within the last 3 months.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now