Sua Sponte Posted January 24, 2022 Posted January 24, 2022 8 minutes ago, ThreeHoler said: Are they still making them go through KC-135 PIQ first or are they finally ready to have a PIQ course? I had heard Altus was doing a SGTO. Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app Currently BIQ/PIQ SGTO is being conducted. When I was TDY there a few months ago I saw pilots and booms doing the -135 IQ the -46 TX courses. Also, TX courses are being taught at MOBs sans the flying portion (Altus).
Guest PeggyDriver46 Posted January 24, 2022 Posted January 24, 2022 46 guy here. We are training most of our fresh guys at an in house FTU, similar to what the KC-10 does. Altus, as of right now, is only doing crossflow guys.
LiquidSky Posted January 24, 2022 Posted January 24, 2022 (edited) 14 hours ago, Sua Sponte said: KC-46? Bold. I know from afpc tankers/the 46 was (is?) a priority must fill along with AETC this last go around. LoveDumpster how is the 46 in reality? I feel the word on the street is a lot of growing pains involving not flying and not worth the tx right now. Edited January 24, 2022 by LiquidSky
Guest PeggyDriver46 Posted January 24, 2022 Posted January 24, 2022 16 minutes ago, LiquidSky said: LoveDumpster how is the 46 in reality? I feel the word on the street is a lot of growing pains involving not flying and not worth the tx right now. This is probably a DMs conversation.
Sua Sponte Posted January 25, 2022 Posted January 25, 2022 5 hours ago, LoveDumpster said: This is probably a DMs conversation. Lol
jazzdude Posted January 25, 2022 Posted January 25, 2022 What's an SGTO?Small group tryout. Think test class to ensure the syllabus/courseware/training is good
ThreeHoler Posted January 26, 2022 Posted January 26, 2022 Small group tryout. Think test class to ensure the syllabus/courseware/training is goodGood is an overstatement I hear.
Sua Sponte Posted January 26, 2022 Posted January 26, 2022 7 hours ago, ThreeHoler said: Good is an overstatement I hear. Didn’t know you were involved in the -46 SGTO? 1
kentuckycriedfricken Posted January 26, 2022 Posted January 26, 2022 CAFB had a T38A drop, too. Not sure why they didn’t include that on the list.
Air_Space Posted February 19, 2022 Posted February 19, 2022 Buffs are back on the menu and in force! No longer are the bottom of the T-38 class guaranteed a viper which was becoming such a work ethic issue 1 1
Bigred Posted February 20, 2022 Posted February 20, 2022 18 hours ago, Air_Space said: Buffs are back on the menu and in force! No longer are the bottom of the T-38 class guaranteed a viper which was becoming such a work ethic issue Why are Vipers considered bottom tier selection? 1
SurelySerious Posted February 20, 2022 Posted February 20, 2022 Why are Vipers considered bottom tier selection? More that there were so many assignments available even the bottom of the class was getting them. 2
Arkbird Posted May 18, 2022 Posted May 18, 2022 KCMB 22-10: AC-130, Hurlburt C-17, Hickam 3x U-28, Hurlburt KC-46, McGuire C-130H, CT ANG KC-135, MS ANG KC-135, UT ANG 3x T-6 FAIP, Columbus C-17, Dover C-17, McGuire C-17, McChord KC-135, Mildenhall C-17, Charleston C-12, Elmendorf T-38 FAIP, Columbus F-22, Eglin F-16, TBD B-52, Barksdale KSPS 22-05: 6x F-16, TBD 2x B-52, Barksdale 3x Typhoon, RAF Coningsby 2x F-22, Eglin 2x Typhoon, Laage AB 2x F-35, Eglin RC-135, Offut 2x Typhoon T-38 FAIP, Sheppard C-146, Duke Field B-1, Dyess
GT35 Posted June 5, 2022 Posted June 5, 2022 KEND 22-10: T-1s: HC-130 - DM C-17 - Dover C-17 - Elmendorf C-17 - McChord C-5 - Dover KC-135 - McConnell KC-135 - McConnell KC-135 - Guard (Not sure where) KC-135 - McLaughlin ANG WV KC-46 - McConnell U-28 - Hurlburt T-6 FAIP - Vance T-38s: 1 x F-35 4 x F-16 1 x T-6 FAIP - Vance (11F Follow On) 1 x F-15C , Portland Guard 1 x A-10 , Whiteman Reserves KDLF 22-10: T-1s: C-5 - Travis C-5 - Dover ANG C-17 - Hickam ANG C-17 - McChord C-17 - Dover C-17 - Travis KC-46 - McConnell AFRC KC-46 - McGuire KC-135 - Fairchild KC-135 - Forbes ANG C-130J - Dyess MC-130J - Kirtland T-6 FAIP - Laughlin (11H Follow On) T-6 FAIP - Laughlin (11M Follow On) ANG Unsponsored T-38s: 1 x F-22 2 x F-16 (1 Guard) 1 x B-1 1 x AC-130 1 x T-6 FAIP - Laughlin (11F Follow On) 1 x T-38 FAIP - Laughlin (11F Follow On)
GT35 Posted June 5, 2022 Posted June 5, 2022 KCBM 22-11 T-1s: C-5 - Travis C-17 - WV ANG C-17 - TN ANG C-17 - Charleston C-17 - PA AFRC C-17 - PA AFRC C-130H - Japan C-130H - NY ANG EC-130 - DM KC-46 - McConnell KC-135 - MacDill T-6 - Columbus (11M Follow On) T-38s: 1 x F-15E 3 x F16 1 x T-38A ADAIR - Langley 1 x A-10 1 x T-38 FAIP Columbus (11F Follow on) 1 x T-6 FAIP Columbus (11B Follow on) KEND 22-11 T-38s: 1 x F-22 3 x F-16 (1 x Tulsa ANG) 1 x F-15E 1 x T-38 FAIP Vance (11F Follow-on) 1 x T-6 FAIP Vance (11F Follow-on) 1 x B-52 I don't have the T-1 side of the house, sorry
LiquidSky Posted June 5, 2022 Posted June 5, 2022 Since when did they start promising FAIPs follow ons and how does that work?
GT35 Posted June 5, 2022 Posted June 5, 2022 7 minutes ago, LiquidSky said: Since when did they start promising FAIPs follow ons and how does that work? I think 22-09 was the first set of classes that got told what their follow-on was going to be. I'm not entirely sure how its going to work though
HeloDude Posted June 5, 2022 Posted June 5, 2022 55 minutes ago, GT35 said: I think 22-09 was the first set of classes that got told what their follow-on was going to be. I'm not entirely sure how its going to work though If you stay in long enough, you’ll see what happened years ago (then ended), come back again. 1
yzl337 Posted June 5, 2022 Posted June 5, 2022 I've seen a lot of follow-on promises in 13 years...take guesses as to how many actually came true, I'll wait. 1
Swizzle Posted June 5, 2022 Posted June 5, 2022 Like AFPC's assignment of preference/follow-on promise (aka policy) falling way unfulfilled and being totally, recently rescinded...wonder how many that lives that affected? AFPC and/or the functionals probably neither care nor know.
hindsight2020 Posted June 5, 2022 Posted June 5, 2022 (edited) I can tell ya the little birdie rumint stuff from 19th. This hair brained idea comes from you know who, the most famous instagram meme person on the AETC side himself. Shocker. At any rate, the RUMINT is this was done to walk the 11B recipients (who largely still view themselves as the losers of the lottery, good bad or indifferent) off the ledge of making career-chucking decisions. This as opposed to the end-game toxicity that usually befalls those who have been busting their hump for 3 years in UPT to end up getting sideswiped by rules #1 and #2 of military life. The gaining commands are basically complaining they can't get them copacetic in time, they need three years. Six months to two weeks from being gained is not cutting it goes the rumor grievance. Edited June 5, 2022 by hindsight2020 1
CaptainMorgan Posted June 5, 2022 Posted June 5, 2022 At any rate, the RUMINT is this was done to walk the 11B recipients (who largely still view themselves as the losers of the lottery, good bad or indifferent) off the ledge of making career-chucking decisions. How does this do anything for 11B recipients? It seems it’ll just cause more 11Bs to drop at UPT down the road, once the current FAIPs with 11F follow-ons complete their FAIP assignment and fill all the fighter B-course slots. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
hindsight2020 Posted June 5, 2022 Posted June 5, 2022 (edited) 45 minutes ago, CaptainMorgan said: How does this do anything for 11B recipients? It seems it’ll just cause more 11Bs to drop at UPT down the road, once the current FAIPs with 11F follow-ons complete their FAIP assignment and fill all the fighter B-course slots. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk No, we're talking about 11B follow-on recipients. And you're missing the point (well, as they see it anyways). It's not meant to do anything for the lottery loser; not anything that they care about anyways (namely, get a fighter in the first place, ostensibly the reason they went 38s). It's meant as a management-of-expectations tool for the benefit of the gaining bomber command. I contend it's virtue signaling, the manning realities of a mismanaged functional command like AFPC will quickly make this effort moot. To wit, it's basically the AF equivalent of that spiel Bob Slydell told Lumberg when he explained why they preferred to fire people on a Friday. Clear as mud? P.S. sweet I got another Office space reference in, when talking USAF broken dreams. Edited June 5, 2022 by hindsight2020
Boomer6 Posted June 5, 2022 Posted June 5, 2022 FAIP plus get an 11B follow-on. Those dudes/dudettes have no incentive to crush themselves for 3 years by flying 3 times a day and volunteering for every stupid tasker that comes down from the boss. They don’t have to play the FAIP game at all, unless they’re trying to fly the B-21 I guess. It sucks but it might be better than 3 years of nut crushing only to lose out again.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now